Shallow processing of ambiguous pronouns: Evidence for delay

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 60, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 1680-1696

  Stewart, Andrew J ^a   Holler, Judith ^a   Kidd, Evan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; HUMANS; LANGUAGE ARTS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 36049040257     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210601160807     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Arnold, J. E., Eisenband, J. G., Brown-Schmidt, S., & Trueswell, J. C. (2000). The rapid use of gender information: Evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eyetracking. Cognition, 76, B13-B26.
2. Christianson, K., Hollingworth, A., Halliwell, J. F., & Ferreira, F. (2001). Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 368-407.
3. Crawley, R. A., Stevenson, R. J., & Kleinman, D. (1990). The use of heuristic strategies in the interpretation of pronouns. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 19, 245-264.
4. Ehrlich, K., & Rayner, K. (1983). Pronoun assignment and semantic integration during reading - eye-movements and immediacy of processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 22, 75-87.
5. Ferreira, F. (2003). The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 164-203.
6. Ferreira, F., Bailey, K. G. D., & Ferraro, V. (2002). Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 11-15.
7. Garnham, A., Oakhill, J., & Cruttenden, H. (1992). The role of implicit causality and gender cue on the interpretation of pronouns. Language and Cognitive Processes, 7, 231-255.
8. Gernsbacher, M. A., & Hargreaves, D. J. (1988). Accessing sentence participants: The advantage of first mention. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 699-717.
9. Greene, S., McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Pronoun resolution and discourse models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 266-283.
10. Klin, C. M., Guzman, A. E., Weingartner, K. M., & Ralano, A. S. (2006). When anaphor resolution fail: Partial encoding of anaphoric inferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 131-143.
11. Klin, C. M., Weingartner, K. M., Guzman, A. E., & Levine, W. H. (2004). Readers' sensitivity to linguistic cues in narratives: How salience influences anaphor resolution. Memory & Cognition, 32, 511-522.
12. Levine, W. H., Guzman, A. E., & Klin, C. M. (2000). When anaphor resolution fails. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 594-617.
13. MacWhinney, B., St James, J., Schunn, C., Li, P., & Schneider, W. (2001). STEP - a system for teaching experimental psychology using E-prime. Behavior Research Methods Instruments and Computers, 33, 287-296.
14. McDonald, J. L., & MacWhinney, B. (1995). The time-course of anaphor resolution - effects of implicit verb causality and gender. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 543-566.
15. Rigalleau, F., & Caplan, D. (2000). Effects of gender marking in pronominal coindexation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 23-52.
16. Rigalleau, F., Caplan, D., & Baudiffier, V. (2004). New arguments in favour of an automatic gender pronominal process. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 893-933.
17. Sanford, A. J., & Garrod, S. C. (1989). What, when and how? Questions of immediacy in anaphoric reference resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 235-262.
18. Sanford, A. J., & Sturt, P. (2002). Depth of processing in language comprehension: Not noticing the evidence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 382-386.
19. Stewart, A. J., Pickering, M. J., & Sanford, A. J. (2000). The time course of the influence of implicit causality information: Focus versus integration accounts. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 423-443.
20. Sturt, P. (2003). The time-course of the application of binding constraints in reference resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 542-562.
21. Van Gompel, R. P. G., Pickering, M. J., & Traxler, M. J. (2000). Unrestricted race: A new model of syntactic ambiguity resolution. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 621-648). Oxford: Elsevier.
22. Van Gompel, R. P. G., Pickering, M. J., & Traxler, M. J. (2001). Reanalysis in sentence processing: Evidence against current constraint-based and two-stage models. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 225-258.