Endogenous influences on perceptual bistability depend on exogenous stimulus characteristics

Vision Research

Volumn 46, Issue 20, 2006, Pages 3393-3402

  Brouwer, Gijs Joost ^a   van Ee, Raymond ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Bistability; Psychophysics; Structure from motion; Voluntary control

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SURFACE PROPERTY; VELOCITY;

ATTENTION; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; ROTATION; VOLITION;

EID: 33746278672     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.03.016     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Andersen R.A., and Bradley D.C. Perception of three-dimensional structure from motion. Trends in Cognitive Neuroscience 2 (1998) 222-228
2. Blake R., and Logothetis N.K. Visual competition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 3 (2002) 13-21
3. Bradley D.C., Qian N., and Andersen R.A. Encoding of three-dimensional structure-from-motion by primate area MT neurons. Nature 392 (1998) 609-611
4. Brascamp J.W., van Ee R., Pestman W.R., and van den Berg A.V. Distributions of alternation rates in various forms of bistable perception. Journal of Vision 5 (2005) 287-298
5. Brouwer G.J., van Ee R., and Schwarzbach J. Activation in visual cortex correlates with the awareness of stereoscopic depth. Journal of Neuroscience 25 (2005) 10403-10413
6. Chong, S. C., Blake, R. (in press). Exogenous attention and endogenous attention influence initial dominance in binocular rivalry. Vision Research, doi:10.1016/j.visres.2005.10.031.
7. Chong S.C., Tadin D., and Blake R. Endogenous attention prolongs dominance durations in binocular rivalry. Journal of Vision 5 (2005) 1004-1012
8. Dodd J.V., Krug K., Cumming B.G., and Parker A.J. Perceptually bistable three-dimensional figure evoke high choice probabilities in cortical areas MT. Journal of Neuroscience 21 (2001) 4809-4821
9. He Z.J., and Nakayama K. Surfaces versus features in visual search. Nature 359 (1992) 231-233
10. He Z.J., and Nakayama K. Apparent motion determined by surface layout, not by disparity or three-dimensional distance. Nature 367 (1994) 173-175
11. He Z.J., and Nakayama K. Surface shape, not features determines apparent motion correspondence. Vision Research 34 (1994) 2125-2136
12. Hildreth E.C., Ando H., Andersen R.A., and Treue S. Recovering three-dimensional structure from motion with surface reconstruction. Vision Research 35 (1995) 117-137
13. Hol K., Koene A., and van Ee R. Attention-biased multi-stable surface perception in three-dimensional structure-from-motion. Journal of Vision 3 (2003) 486-498
14. Kleinschmidt A., Buchel C., Zeki S., and Frackowiak R.S. Human brain activity during spontaneously reversing perception of ambiguous figures. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B 265 (1998) 2427-2433
15. Lack L.C. Selective attention and the control of binocular rivalry (1978), Mouton, The Hague, The Netherlands
16. Leopold D.A., and Logothetis N.K. Activity changes in early visual cortex reflects monkey' percepts during binocular rivalry. Nature 379 (1996) 549-553
17. Levelt W. On binocular rivalry (1965), Institute of Perception, Soesterberg, The Netherlands
18. Logothetis N.K., and Schall J.D. Neuronal correlates of subjective visual perception. Science 245 (1989) 761-763
19. Lumer E.D., Friston K.J., and Rees G. Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain. Science 280 (1998) 1930-1934
20. Meng M., and Tong F. Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. Journal of Vision 45 (2004) 39-51
21. Miles W.R. Movement interpretations of the silhouette of a revolving fan. The American Journal of Psychology 42 (1931) 392-405
22. Neri P., and Heeger D.J. Spatiotemporal mechanisms for detecting and identifying image features in human vision. Nature Neuroscience 5 (2002) 812-816
23. Neri P., Parker A.J., and Blakemore C. Probing the human stereoscopic system with reverse correlation. Nature 14 (1999) 695-698
24. Parker A.J., and Krug K. Neuronal mechanisms for the perception of ambiguous stimuli. Current Biology 13 (2003) 433-439
25. Peterson M.A. Illusory concomitant motion in ambiguous stereograms: evidence for nonstimulus contributions to perceptual organization. Journal of Experimental Psychology 12 (1986) 50-60
26. Polonsky A., Blake R., Braun J., and Heeger D.J. Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry. Nature Neuroscience 3 (2000) 1153-1159
27. Suzuki S., and Peterson M.A. Multiplicative effects of intention on the perception of bistable apparent motion. Psychological Science 11 (2000) 202-209
28. Tong F., Nakayama K., Vaughan J.T., and Kanwisher N. Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex. Neuron 21 (1998) 753-759
29. Toppino T.C. Reversible-figure perception: mechanisms of intentional control. Perception and Psychophysics 65 (2003) 1285-1295
30. Treue S., Andersen R.A., Ando H., and Hildreth E.C. Structure-from-motion: perceptual evidence for surface interpolation. Vision Research 1 (1995) 139-148
31. Treue S., Husain M., and Andersen R. Human perception of structure from motion. Vision Research 31 (1991) 59-75
32. van Dam L.C.J., and van Ee R. The role of saccades in exerting voluntary control in perceptual and binocular rivalry. Vision Research 46 (2006) 787-799
33. van Ee, R., Noest, A. J., Brascamp, J. W., van den Berg, A. V. (2006). Attentional control over either of the two competing percepts of ambiguous stimuli revealed by a two-parameter analysis: Means do not make the difference Vision Research, 46, in press, doi:10.1016/j.visres.2006.03.017.
34. van Ee R., van Dam L.C.J., and Brouwer G.J. Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bi-stability. Vision Research 45 (2005) 41-51
35. Wallach H., and O'Connell D.N. The kinetic depth effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology 45 (1953) 205-217