Dealing with a disagreeing partner: Relational and epistemic conflict elaboration

European Journal of Psychology of Education

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 227-242

  Darnon, Céline ^a,c   Doll, Sébastien ^a   Butera, Fabrizio ^b  

^a UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITÉ BLAISE PASCAL   (France)

Author keywords

Conflict; Epistemic regulation; Learning; Relational regulation; Threat

Indexed keywords

EID: 36048983111     PISSN: 02562928     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03173423     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Baron, R.A. (1988). Negative effects of destructive criticism: Impact on conflict, self-efficacy, and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 199-207.
2. Berlyne, D.E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill.
3. Brauer, M. (2002). L'analyse des variables indépendantes continues et catégorielles: Alternatives àla dichotomisation. L'Année Psychologique, 102, 449-484.
4. Brennan, J.G., Miller, L.E., & Seltzer, J. (1993). Influence tactics and effectiveness. The Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 747-748.
5. Buchs, C., Butera, F., & Mugny, G. (2004). Resource interdependence, student interactions and performance in cooperative learning. Educational Psychology, 24, 291-314.
6. Buchs, C., Butera, F., Mugny, G., & Damon, C. (2004). Conflict elaboration and cognitive outcomes. Theory Into Practice, 43, 23-30.
7. Butera, F., & Buchs, C. (2005). Reasoning together: From focussing to decentring. In V. Girotto & P.N. Johnson-Laird (Eds.), The shape of reason (pp. 193-203). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
8. Butera, F., & Mugny, G. (1995). Conflict between incompetences and influence of a low expertise source in hypothesis testing. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 457-462.
9. Butera, F., & Mugny, G. (2001). Conflicts and social influences in hypothesis testing. In C.K.W. Dc Dreu & N.K. De Vries (Eds.), Group consensus and minority influence. Implications for innovation (pp. 161-182). Oxford: Blackwell.
10. Butera, F., Mugny, G., & Tomei, A. (2000). Incertitude et enjeux identitaires dans l'influence sociale. In J.L. Beauvois, R.V. Joule, & J.M. Monteil (Eds.), Perspectives cognitives et conduites sociale (vol. VII, pp. 205-229). Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
11. Butera, F., Gardair, E., Maggi, J., & Mugny, G. (1998). Les paradoxes de l'expertise: Influence sociale et (in)compétence de soi et d'autrui. In J. Py, A. Somat, & J. Baillé (Eds.), Psychologie sociale et formation professionnelle: Propositions et regards critiques (pp. 111-123). Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
12. Butera, F., Huguet, P., Mugny, G., & Pérez, J.A. (1994). Socio-epistemic conflict and constructivism. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 53, 229-239.
13. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis far the behavioral sciences (2nd edition). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Damon, W., & Kilen, M. (1982). Peer interaction and the process of change in children's moral reasoning. MerrillPalmer Quarterly, 28, 347-367.
15. Damon, C., & Butera, F. (in press). Learning or succeeding? Conflict regulation with mastery or performance goals. Swiss Journal of Psychology.
16. Damon, C., Buchs, C., & Butera, F. (2002). Epistemic and relational conflict in sharing information during cooperative learning. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 61, 139-151.
17. Damon, C., Butera, F., & Harackicwicz, J. (2007). Achievement goals in social interactions: Learning with mastery vs. performance goal. Motivation and Emotion, 31, 61-70.
18. Damon, C., Muller, D., Schrager, S.M., Parmuzzo, N., & Butera, F. (2006). Mastery and performance goals predict epistemic and relational conflict regulation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 766-776.
19. Doise, W., & Mugny, G. (1984). The social development of the intellect. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
20. Doise, W., Deschamps, J.C., & Mugny, G. (1991). Psychologie sociale expérimentale. Paris: Armand Colin.
21. Dweck, C.S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048.
22. Gruber, H.E. (2000). Creativity and conflict resolution: The role of point of view. In M. Deutsch & P.T. Coleman (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (pp. 345-354). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc Publishers.
23. Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1985). Classroom conflict: Controversy versus debate in learning groups. American Educational Research Journal, 22, 237-256.
24. Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1994). The pro-con cooperative group strategy: Structuring academic controversy within the social studies classroom. In R. Stahl (Ed.), Cooperative learning in social studies: A handbook for teachers (pp. 306-331). New-York: Addison-Westley Publishing Company.
25. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., & Smith, K. (2000). Constructive controversy, the educative power of intellectual conflict. Change, 32, 29-37.
26. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., & Stanne, M.S. (1989). Impact of goal and resource interdependence on problem solving success. The Journal of Social Psychology, 129, 621-629.
27. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., & Tjosvold, D. (2000). Constructive controversy: The value of intellectual opposition. In M. Deutsch & P.T. Coleman (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (pp. 65-85). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc Publishers.
28. Judd, C.M., & McClelland, G.H. (1989). Data analysis: A model comparison approach. San Diego: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
29. Krauss, R.M., & Morsella, E. (2000). Communication and conflict. In M. Deutsch & P.T. Coleman (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (pp. 131-143). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers.
30. Lambiotte, J., Dansereau, D., O'Donnell, A., Young, M., Skaggs, L., Hall, R., & Rocklin, T. (1987). Manipulating cooperative scripts for teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Pyschology, 79, 424-430.
31. Lowry, N., & Johnson, D.W. (1981). Effect of controversy on epistemic curiosity, achievement and attitudes. The Journal of Social Psychology, 115, 31-43.
32. Maggi, J., Mugny, G., & Papastamou, S. (1998). Les styles de comportement et leur représentation sociale. In S. Moscovici (Ed.), Psychologie sociale. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
33. Monteil, J.M., & Chambres, P. (1990). Eléments pour une exploration des dimensions du conflit socio-cognitif: Une expérimentation chez l'adulte. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 4, 499-517.
34. Mugny, G. ( 1982). The power of minorities. London: Academic Press.
35. Mugny, G., Chatard, A., & Quiamzade, A. (2006). The social transmission of knowledge at the university: Teaching style and epistemic dependence. European Journal of Psychology of Education, XXI(4), 413-427.
36. Mugny, G., De Paolis, P., & Carugati, F. (1984). Social regulations in cognitive development. In W. Doise & A. Palmonari (Eds.), Social interaction in individual development (pp. 127-146). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Mugny, G., Tafani, E., Butera, F., & Pigière, D. (1999). Contrainte et dépendance informationnelles: Influence sociale sur la représentation du groupe d'amis idéal. Connexions, 72, 55-72.
38. Mugny, G., Butera, F., Quiamzade, A., Dragulescu, A., & Tomei, A. (2003). Comparaisons sociales des competences et dynamiques d'influence sociale dans les tâches d'aptitudes. L'Année Psychologique, 104, 469-496.
39. Pérez, J.A., Mugny, G., Maggi, J., Falomir, J.M., & Butera, F. (1995). L'élaboration du conflit. Les significations du conflit dans l'influence sociale. Psychoscope, 2, 11-14.
40. Quiamzade, A., & Mugny, G. (2001). Social influence dynamics in aptitude tasks. Social Psychology of Education, 4, 311-334.
41. Quiamzade, A., Tomei, A., & Butera, F. (2000). Informational dependence and informational constraint: Social comparison and social influences in an anagram resolution task. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 15, 123-150.
42. Quiamzade, A., Mugny, G., Dragulescu, A., & Buchs, C. (2004). Interaction styles and expert social influence. European Journal of Psychology of Education, XVIII(4), 389-404.
43. Quiamzade, A., Mugny, G., Falomir, J.-M., Invemizzi, F., Buchs, C., & Dragulescu, A. (2004). Correspondance entre style d'influence et significations des positions initiales de la cible: Le cas des sources expertes. In J.-L. Beauvois, R.-V. Joule, & J.-M. Monteil (Eds,), Perspectives cognitive! et conduites sociales (vol. 9, pp, 341-363). Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
44. Smith, K., Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1981). Can conflict be constructive? Controversy versus concurrence seeking in learning groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 651 -663.
45. Tjosvold, D. (1989). Cooperative and competitive goal approach to conflict: Accomplishments and challenges. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 47, 285-342.
46. Tjosvold, D., Johnson, D.W., & Fabrey, L.J. (1980). Effect of controversy and defensiveness on cognitive perspective taking. Psychological Reports, 47, 1043-1053.
47. Tjosvold, D., Johnson, D.W., & Lemer, J. (1981). Effects of affirmation and acceptance on incorporation of opposing information in problem solving. The Journal of Social Psychology, 114, 103-110.
48. Tomasetto, C. (2004). Influence style and students' orientation toward extra-curricular activities: An application of the correspondence hypothesis. European Journal of Psychology of Education, XIX(2), 133-145.
49. Van Knippenberg, B., & Steensma, H. (2003). Future interaction expectation and the use of soft and hard influence tactics. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 52, 55-67.
50. Yukl, G., & Tracey, J.B. (1992). Consequences of influence tactics used with subordinates, peers, and the boss. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 525-535.