Feminists rethink gender

About Psychology: Essays at the Crossroads of History, Theory, and Philosophy

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 127-146

  Kimball, Meredith M ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36048930211     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (88)

1. APA Task Force on Women in Academe. (2000). Women in Academe: Two steps forward, one step back. American Psychological Association. Available: www.wpw.org/pi/wpo.
2. Aronson, J., Lustina, M. J., Good, C., & Keough, K. (1999). When white men can't do math: Necessary and sufficient factors in stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 29-46.
3. Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1980). Sex differences in mathematical ability: Fact or artifact? Science, 210, 1262-1264.
4. Boatswain, S., Brown, N., Fiksenbaum, L., Goldstein, L., Greenglass, E., Nadler, E., & Pyke, S. (2001). Canadian feminist psychology: Where are we now? Canadian Psychology, 42, 276-285.
5. Bohan, J. S. (1993). Regarding gender: Essentialism, constructionism, and feminist psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 17, 5-21.
6. Campbell, R., & Schram, P. J. (1995). Feminist research methods: A content analysis of psychology and social science textbooks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 85-106.
7. Canetto, S. S. (2001). Older adult women: Issues, resources, and challenges. In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 183-197). New York, NY: Wiley.
8. Chanter, T. (2000). Gender aporias. Signs, 25, 1237-1241.
9. Clayton, S. D., & Crosby, F. J. (1992). Justice, gender, and affirmative action. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
10. Cole, E. R., Zucker, A. N., & Duncan, L. E. (2001). Changing society, changing women (and men). In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 410-423). New York, NY: Wiley.
11. Connell, R. W. (1999). Making gendered people: bodies, identities, sexualities. In M. M. Ferree, J. Lorber, & B. B. Hess (Eds.), Revisioning gender (pp. 449-472). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Crawford, M., & Kimmel, E. (1999). Promoting methodological diversity in feminist research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 1-6.
13. Crawford, M., & Marecek, J. (1989). Psychology reconstructs the female: 1968-1988. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 147-165.
14. Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15. Deaux, K., & Stewart, A. (2001). Framing gendered identities. In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 84-97). New York, NY: Wiley.
16. Devor, H. (2000). Speaking subjects: Theory in the vernacular. Feminism & Psychology, 10, 41-45.
17. Dion, K. K., & Dion, K. L. (2001). Gender and Relationships. In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 256-271). New York, NY: Wiley.
18. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Enloe, C. (2000). The surprised feminist. Signs, 25, 1023-1026.
20. Favreau, O. (1997). Sex and gender comparisons: Does null-hypothesis testing create a false dichotomy? Feminism and Psychology, 7, 63-81.
21. Fidell, L. S. (1970). Empirical verification of sex discrimination in hiring practices in psychology. American Psychologist, 25, 1094-1098.
22. Fine, M., & Carney, S. (2001). Women, gender, and the law: Toward a feminist rethinking of responsibility. In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 388-409). New York, NY: Wiley.
23. Fine, M., & Gordon, S. M. (1991). Effacing the center and the margins: Life at the intersection of psychology and feminism. Feminism & Psychology, 1, 19-27.
24. Gerschick, T. J. (2000). Toward a theory of disability and gender. Signs, 25, 1263-1268.
25. Gilbert, L. A., & Rader, J. (2001). Current perspectives on women's adult roles: Work, family, and life. In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 156-169). New York, NY: Wiley.
26. Golden, C. R. (2000). Still seeing differently, after all these years. Feminism and Psychology, 10, 30-35.
27. Goodwin, S. A., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). Power and gender: The double-edged sword of ambivalence. In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 358-366). New York, NY: Wiley.
28. Gurevich, M. (2001). W (h) ither psychology of women?: Current trends and future directions for the Section on Women and Psychology. Canadian Psychology 42, 301-312.
29. Hare-Mustin, R. T., & Marecek, J. (1994). Asking the right questions: Feminist psychology and sex differences. Feminism & Psychology, 4, 531-537.
30. Henley, N. M. (1977). Body politics: Power, sex, and nonverbal communication. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
31. Henley, N. M., Meng, K., O'Brien, D., McCarthy, W. J., & Sockloskie, R. J. (1998). Developing a scale to measure the diversity of feminist attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 317-348.
32. Henwood, K., & Pidgeon, N. (1995). Remaking the link: Qualitative research and feminist standpoint theory. Feminism & Psychology, 5, 7-30.
33. Hogan, J. D., & Sexton, V. S. (1991). Women and the American Psychological Association. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 623-634.
34. Hollingworth, L. S. (1914). Variability as related to sex differences in achievement: A critique. American Journal of Sociology, 19, 510-530.
35. Hollingworth, L. S. (1916a). Sex differences in mental traits. Psychological Bulletin, 13, 377-384.
36. Hollingworth, L. S. (1916b). Social devices for impelling women to bear and rear children. American Journal of Sociology, 22, 19-29.
37. Hollingworth, L. S. (1918). Sex differences in mental traits. Psychological Bulletin, 15, 427-432.
38. Hollingworth, L. S. (1919). Sex differences in mental traits. Psychological Bulletin, 16, 371-373.
39. Hull, H. R. (1917). The long handicap. Psychoanalytic Review, 4, 434-442.
40. Hyde, J. S. (1994). Can meta-analysis make feminist transformations in psychology? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 451-462.
41. Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 139-155.
42. Jones, S. J. (1997). Reflexivity and feminist practice: Ethical dilemmas in negotiating meaning. Feminism & Psychology, 7, 348-353.
43. Kessler, S. J. (1998). Lessons from the intersexed. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
44. Kessler, S. J., & McKenna, W. (1978). Gender: An ethnomethodological approach. New York, NY: Wiley.
45. Kimball, M. M. (1989). A new perspective on women's math achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 198-214.
46. Kimball, M. M. (1995). Feminist visions of gender similarities and differences. Binghamton, NY: Haworth.
47. Kimball, M. M. (2001). Gender similarities and differences as feminist contradictions. In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 66-83). New York, NY: Wiley.
48. Kite, M. E. (2001). Changing times, changing gender roles: Who do we want women and men to be? In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 215-227). New York, NY: Wiley.
49. Kitzinger, C. (2001). Sexualities. In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 272-285). New York, NY: Wiley.
50. Kitzinger, C., & Wilkinson, S. (1997). Validating women's experience? Dilemmas in feminist research. Feminism & Psychology, 7, 566-574.
51. LaFrance, M. (2001). Gender and social interaction. In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 245-255). New York, NY: Wiley.
52. Lips, H. M. (1991). Women, men, and power. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
53. Marecek, J. (1995). Gender, politics, and psychology's ways of knowing. American Psychologist, 50, 162-163.
54. Marecek, J. (2001a). After the facts: Psychology and the study of gender. Canadian Psychology, 42, 254-267.
55. Marecek, J. (2001b). Disorderly constructs: Feminist frameworks for clinical psychology. In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 303-316). New York, NY: Wiley.
56. McKenna, W., & Kessler, S. J. (2000). Retrospective response. Feminism & Psychology, 10, 66-72.
57. Mednick, M. T., & Urbanski, L. L. (1991). The origins and activities of APA's Division of the Psychology of Women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 651-663.
58. O'Barr, J. F. (2000). My master list for the millennium. Signs, 25, 1205-1207.
59. Pyke, S. W. (2001). Feminist psychology in Canada: Early days. Canadian Psychology, 42, 268-275.
60. Rabinowitz, V. C., & Martin, D. (2001). Choices and consequences: Methodological issues in the study of gender. In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 29-52). New York, NY: Wiley.
61. Richie, B. E. (2000). A Black feminist reflection on the antiviolence movement. Signs, 25, 1133-1137.
62. Scott, J. W. (1999). Some reflection on gender and politics. In M. M. Ferree, J. Lorber, & B. B. Hess (Eds.), Revisioning gender (pp. 70-96). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
63. Shields, S. A. (1975). Functionalism, Darwinism, and the psychology of women: A study in social myth. American Psychologist, 30, 739-754.
64. Shields, S. A. (1982). The variability hypothesis: The history of a biological model of sex differences of intelligence. Signs, 7, 769-797.
65. Shih, M., Pittinsky, T. L., & Ambady, N. (1999). Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 10, 80-83.
66. Snodgrass, S. E. (1992). Further effects of role versus gender on interpersonal sensitivity. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 62, 154-158.
67. Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women's math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4-28.
68. Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613-629.
69. Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797-811.
70. Steinpreis, R. E., Anders, K. A., & Ritzke, D. (1999). The impact of gender on the review of the curricula vitae of job applicants and tenure candidates: A national empirical study. Sex Roles, 41, 509-528.
71. Stimpson, C. R. (2000). On being transminded. Signs, 25, 1007-1011.
72. Tiefer, L. (1991). A brief history of the Association for Women in Psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 635-649.
73. Tolman, D. L., & Brown, L. M. (2001). Adolescent girls' voices: Resonating resistance in body and soul. In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 133-155). New York: Wiley.
74. Unger, R. K. (1979). Toward a redefinition of sex and gender. American Psychologist, 34, 1085-1094.
75. Unger, R. K. (1992). Will the real sex difference please stand up? Feminism & Psychology, 2, 231-238.
76. Unger, R. K. (1993). Alternative conceptions of sex (and sex differences). In M. Haug, R. Whelan, C. Aron, & K. L. Olsen (Eds.), The development of sex differences and similarities in behavior (pp. 457-476). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
77. Unger, R. K. (1998). Resisting gender: Twenty-five years of feminist psychology. London, UK: Sage.
78. Unger, R. K. (2001). Women as subjects, actors, and agents in the history of psychology. In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 3-16). New York, NY: Wiley.
79. Walsh, M., Hickey, C., & Duffy, J. (1999). Influence of item content and stereotype situation on gender differences in mathematical problem solving. Sex Roles, 41, 219-240.
80. White, J. W., Donat, P. L. N., & Bondurant, B. (2001). A developmental examination of violence against girls and women. In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 343-357). New York, NY: Wiley.
81. Wilchins, R. A. (1997). Read my lips: Sexual subversion and the end of gender. Ithaca, NY: Firebrand.
82. Wilkinson, S. (2001). Theoretical perspectives on women and gender. In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 17-28). New York, NY: Wiley.
83. Wintre, M. G., North, C., & Sugar, L. A. (2001). Psychologists' response to criticisms about research based on undergraduate participants: A developmental perspective. Canadian Psychology, 42, 216-225.
84. Woolley, H. T. (1910). A review of the recent literature on the psychology of sex. Psychological Bulletin, 7, 335-342.
85. Woolley, H. T. (1914). The psychology of sex. Psychological Bulletin, 11, 353-379.
86. Worell, J., & Johnson, D. (2001). Therapy with women: Feminist frameworks. In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 317-329). New York, NY: Wiley.
87. Wyche, K. F. (2001). Sociocultural issues in counseling for women of color. In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 330-340). New York, NY: Wiley.
88. Yamamoto, T. (2000). Millennial bodies. Signs, 25, 1243-1246.