W(h)ither psychology of women?: Current trends and future directions for the section on women and psychology

Canadian Psychology

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 301-312

  Curevich, Maria ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

^b RYERSON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035624152     PISSN: 07085591     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/h0086898     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. APA Division 35 (Psychology of Women). (2001). Membership office. Available: www.apa.org/divisions/div35/.
2. APA Task Force on Women in Academe. (2000). Women in academe: Two steps forward, one step back. American Psychological Association. Available: www.apa.org/pi/wpo.
3. Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B.M., Goldberger, N.R., & Tarule, J.M. (1986). Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic.
4. Bem, S.L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155-162.
5. Bem, S.L., & Lenney, E. (1976). Sex-typing and the avoidance of cross-sex behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology; 33, 48-54.
6. Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Billig, M. (1991). Ideologies and beliefs. London: Sage.
8. Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D., &: Radley, A. (1988). Ideological dilemmas: A social psychology of everyday thinking. London: Sage.
9. Boatswain, S., Brown, N., Fiksenbaum, L., Goldstein, L., Greenglass, E., Nadler, E., & Pyke, S.W. (2001). Canadian feminist psychology: Where are we now? Canadian Psychology, 42(4), 276-285.
10. Bower, J. (1999). (Im)possible women: Gender, sexuality and the British Army. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University College London, UK.
11. Bower, J., & Gurevich, M. (2000 June). Methodolatry, epistemology and politics: Deconstructing the qualitative/quantitative debate. Paper presented at the Annual Canadian Psychological Association Conference, Ottawa.
12. British Psychological Society. (2001). Membership office. Available: mail@bps.org.uk.
13. Burman, E. (1998). Deconstructing feminist psychology. In E. Burman (Ed.), Deconstructing feminist psychology (pp. 1-29). London: Sage.
14. Burman, E., & Parker, I. (1993a). Introduction - discourse analysis: The turn to text. In E. Burman & I. Parker (Eds.,), Discourse analytic research: Repertoires and readings of texts in action (pp. 1-13). London: Routledge.
15. Burman, E., & Parker, I. (Eds). (1993b). Discourse analytic research: Repertoires and readings of texts in action. London: Routledge.
16. Caplan, P. (1993). Lifting a ton of feathers: A woman's guide to surviving in the academic world. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
17. CAUT Status of Women Committee. (2000). Women in post-secondary education. CAUT Bulletin (Supplement), 47(4), 4-5.
18. Condor, S. (1991). Sexism in psychological research: A brief note. Feminism and Psychology, 1, 430-434.
19. Cormier, R. (2001). SWAP web page. Newsletter of the CPA Section on Women and Psychology, 27, 1.
20. CPA Membership Services. (2001). Canadian Psychological Association. E-mail:cpamemb@cpa.ca
21. Crawford, M., & Kimmel, E. (1999). Promoting methodological diversity in feminist research [Special issue]. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 1-6.
22. Denmark, F. L. (1998). Women and psychology: An international perspective. American Psychologist, 53, 465-473.
23. Elliott, R., Fischer, C.T., & Rennie, D.L. (1999). Evoking guidelines for publication of qualitative research stud-ies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 215-229.
24. Epstein, C. (1988). Deceptive distinctions: Sex, gender and the social order. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
25. Favreau, O.E. (1997). Sex and gender comparisons: Does null hypothesis testing create a false dichotomy? Feminism and Psychology, 7, 63-81.
26. Fine, M., & Addelston, J. (1996). Containing questions of gender and power: The discursive limits of 'sameness' and 'difference.' In S. Wilkinson (Ed.), Feminist social psychologies: International perspectives. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
27. Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality: Volume I, an introduction (trans. R. Hurley). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
28. Fox, D., & Prilleltensky, I. (Eds.). (1997). Critical psychology: An introduction. London: Sage.
29. Gavey, N. (1989). Feminist post-structuralism and discourse analysis: Contributions to feminist psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 459-475.
30. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31. Griffin, C. (1986). Qualitative methods and female experience: Young women from school to the job market. In S. Wilkinson (Ed.), Feminist social psychology. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
32. Griffin, C., & Phoenix, A. (1994). The relationship between qualitative and quantitative research: Lessons from feminist psychology. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 4, 277-298.
33. Grossman, F.K., Gilbert, L.A., Genero, N. P., Hawes, S.E., Hyde, J.S., & Marecek, J. (1997). Feminist research: Practice and problems. In J. Worell & N.G. Johnson (Eds.), Shaping the future of feminist: psychology/education, research and practice (pp. 73-91). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
34. Harding, S. (Ed.). (1987). Feminism and methodology: Social science issues. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
35. Harding, S. (1995). Strong objectivity: A response to the new objectivity question. Synthese, 104, 331-349.
36. Harré, R., & Stearns, P. (1995). Discursive psychology in practice. London: Sage.
37. Henriques, J., Hollway, W., Unvin, C., Venn, C., & Walkerdine, V. (Eds.). (1984). Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation, and subjectivity. London: Methuen.
38. Henwood, K.L., Griffin, C., & Phoenix, A. (Eds.). (1998). Standpoints and differences/essays in the practice of feminist psychology. London: Sage.
39. Henwood, K.L., & Pidgeon, N.F. (1992). Qualitative research and psychological theorizing. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 97-111.
40. Henwood, K.L., & Pidgeon, N.F. (1995). Remaking the link: Qualitative research and feminist standpoint theory. Feminism and Psychology, 5, 7-30.
41. Husu, L. (1995). Academic women and hidden discrimination. Paper presented at the 18th Nordic Sociological Conference. Helsinki.
42. Jacklin, C.N., & McBride-Chang, C. (1991). The effects of feminist scholarship on developmental psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 549-556.
43. Kimball, M.M. (1995). Feminist visions of gender similarities and differences. New York: Harrington Park Press.
44. Kimball, M.M. (1997). A review of 'The roles and participation of women in social science associations in Canada: Final report,' by D. Thomson & C. Stark-Adamec, Social Science Federation of Canada. Newsletter of the CPA Section on Women and Psychology, 23, 4-5.
45. Kitzinger, C. (1987). The social construction of lesbianism. London: Sage.
46. Kroger, R.O., & Wood, L.A. (1998). The turn to discourse in social psychology. Canadian Psychology, 39, 266-279.
47. Maison, H. (1999). To boldly go ... POWS, politics, feminisms, futures. Psychology of Women Section Review, 1, 31-37.
48. Marecek, J. (2001). After the facts: Psychology and the study of gender. Canadian Psychology, 42(4), 254-267.
49. Mednick, M.T. (1989). On the politics of psychological constructs: Stop the bandwagon, I want to get off. American Psychologist, 44, 1118-1123.
50. Mednick, M.T. (1991). Currents and futures in American feminist psychology/State of the art revisited. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 611-621.
51. Mednick, M.T. (1998). Comments on Carolyn Sherif's 'Bias in Psychology' chapter and other assorted remarks. Feminism and Psychology, 8, 94-98.
52. Morawski, J.G. (1994). Practising feminisms, reconstructing psychology: Notes on a liminal science. Ann Arbor, MI: University Michigan Press.
53. Morawski, J., & Agronick, G. (1991). A restive legacy: The history of feminist work in experimental and cognitive psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 567-580.
54. Moretti, M. M., Rein, A.S., & Webe, V.J. (1998). Relational self-regulation: Gender differences in risk for dysphoria. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 30, 243-252.
55. Morgan, M. (1998). Qualitative research: Science or pseudo-science? The Psychologist, 11,481-483.
56. Nicholson, L.J. (Ed.). (1990). Feminism/postmodernism. London: Routledge.
57. O'Connell, A.N., & Russo, N.F. (1991). Women's heritage in psychology: Origins, development, and future directions [Special Issue]. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15 (4).
58. Ornstein, M., & Stewart, P. (1996). Gender and faculty pay in Canada. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 21, 461-481.
59. Ornstein, M., Stewart, P., & Drakich, J. (1998). The status of women faculty in Canadian universities. Education Quarterly Review, Statistics Canada Catalogue, No.81-003, Vol. 5 (2), 9-29.
60. Parker, I. (1989). The crisis in modern social psychology and how to end it. London: Routledge.
61. Parker, I. (1992). Discourse dynamics: Critical analysis for social and individual psychology. London: Routledge.
62. Parker, I. (Ed.). (1998). Social constructionism, discourse and realism. London: Sage.
63. Parker, I., & Shetter, J. (Eds.). (1990). Deconstructing social psychology. London: Routledge.
64. Peplau, L.A., & Conrad, E. (1989). Beyond nonsexist research: The perils of feminist methods in psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 379-400.
65. Pion, G.M., Mednick, M.T., Astin, H.S., Iijima Hall, C.C., Kenkel, M.B., Keata, G.P., Kohout, J.L., & Kelleher, J.C. (1996). The shifting gender composition of psychology/Trends and implications for the discipline. American Psychologist, 51, 509-528.
66. Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.
67. Prilleltensky, I. (1994). The morals and politics of psychology: Psychological discourse and the status quo. Albany, NY: State University of New York.
68. Pyke, S.W. (in press). In the beginning....Canadian Psychology.
69. Pyke, S.W., & Greenglass, E.R. (1997). Women and organisational structures: An avenue to influence. Newsletter of the CPA Section on Women and Psychology, 23, 5-8.
70. Pyke, S.W., & Stark-Adamec, C. (1981). Canadian feminism and psychology: The first decade. Canadian Psychology, 22, 38-54.
71. Radtke, L.H., & Stam, H. J. (Eds.). (1994). Power/gender: Social relations in theory and practice. London: Sage.
72. Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York: Oxford University Press.
73. Russo, N.F. (1998). Measuring feminist attitudes: Just what does it mean to be a feminist? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 313-315.
74. Russo, N.F (1999). Feminist research: Questions and methods [Special Issue]. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, i-iv.
75. Sherif, C.W. (1998). Featured reprint: Bias in psychology. Feminism and Psychology, 8, 58-75.
76. Shields, S.A. (1998). Illusions of progress and 'insurgent science:' An imagined conversation. Feminism and Psychology, 8, 99-104.
77. Shotter, J. (1993). Conversational realities: Constructing life through language. London: Sage.
78. Sommers, C.H. (1994). Who stole feminism: How women have betrayed women. New York: Simon & Schuster.
79. Statistics Canada (2000). Culture, Tourism and the Centre for Education Statistics. Ottawa.
80. Steinpreis, R.E., Anders, K.A., & Ritzke, D. (1999). The impact of gender on the review of the curricula vitae of job applicants and tenure candidates: A national empirical study. Sex Roles, 41, 509-528.
81. Tolman, D.L., & Szalacha, L.A. (1999). Dimensions of desire/Bridging qualitative and quantitative methods in a study of female adolescent sexuality [Special Issue]. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 7-39.
82. Tong, R. (1998). Feminist thought: A more comprehensive introduction. Boulder, CO: Oxford Westview Press.
83. Unger, R.K. (1992). Through the looking glass: No wonderland yet! (The reciprocal relationship between methodology and models of reality). In J.S. Bohan (Ed.), Seldom seen, rarely heard: Women's place in psychology (pp. 147-170). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
84. Ussher, J.M. (1999). Eclecticism and methodological pluralism: The way forward for feminist research [Special issue]. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 41-46.
85. Wager, M. (1998). Women or researchers? The identities of academic women. Feminism and Psychology, 8, 236-244.
86. Wetherell, M., & Potter, J. (1988). Discourse analysis and the identification of interpretative repertoires. In C. Antaki (Ed.), Analysing everyday explanations: A casebook of methods. London: Sage.
87. Wilkinson, S., & Kitzinger, C. (Eds.). (1995). Feminism and discourse: Psychological perspectives. London: Sage.