The uncemented primary bicontact stem in revision total hip arthroplasty in young patients

Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie

Volumn 145, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2007, Pages

  Thorey, Frits ^a   Lerch, M ^a   Kiel, H ^a   Von Lewinski, G ^a   Stukenborg Colsman, C ^a   Windhagen, H ^a  

^a HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bicontact; Revision; Total hip arthroplasty (THA); Young patients

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE DEFECT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MALE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; REOPERATION; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

EID: 35948972200     PISSN: 1864-669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-965659     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Hungerford DS, Jones LC. The rationale for cementless total hip replacement. Orthop Clin North Am 1993; 24: 617-626
2. Krishnamurthy AB, MacDonald SJ, Paprosky WG. 5- to 13-year follow-up study on cementless femoral components in revision surgery. J Arthroplasty 1997; 12: 839-847
3. Lawrence JM, Engh CA, Macalino GE, Lauro GR. Outcome of revision hip arthroplasty done without cement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1994; 76: 965-973
4. Moreland JR, Bernstein ML. Femoral revision hip arthroplasty with uncemented, porous-coated stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995; 319: 141-150
5. Moreland JR, Moreno MA. Cementless femoral revision arthroplasty of the hip: minimum 5 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; 393: 194-201
6. Paprosky WG, Greidanus NV, Antoniou J. Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; 369: 230-242
7. Herberts P, Malchau H. Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement. A review of the Swedish THR register comparing 160 000 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71: 111-121
8. Furnes O, Lei SA, Espelhaug B, Vollset SE, Engesaeter L, Havelin LI. Hip disease and the prognosis of total hip replacements. A review of 53 698 primary total hip replacements reported to the Norwegian arthroplasty register 1987-99. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2001; 83: 579-586
9. Eskelinen A, Remes V, Helenius I, Pulkkinen P, Nevalainen J, Paavolainen P. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in young patients in the Finnish arthroplasty register. 4661 primary replacements followed for 0.22 years. Acta Orthop Scand 2006; 76: 28-41
10. Paprosky WG, Bradford MS, Younger TI. Classification of bone defects in failed prostheses. Chir Organi Mov 1994; 79: 285-291
11. Paprosky WG, Burnett RS. Assessment and classification of bone stock deficiency in revision total hip arthroplasty. Am J Orthop 2002; 31: 459-464
12. Kavanagh BF, Ilstrup DM, Fitzgerald RH Jr. Revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1985; 67: 517-526
13. Katz RP, Callaghan JJ, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC. Results of cemented femoral revision total hip arthroplasty using improved cementing techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995; 319: 178-183
14. Mulroy WF, Harris WH. Revision total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second-generation cementing techniques for aseptic loosening of the femoral component. A fifteen-year-average follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1996; 78: 325-330
15. Berry DJ, Harmsen WS, Ilstrup D, Lewallen DG, Cabanela ME. Survivorship of uncemented proximally porous-coated femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995; 319: 168-177
16. Harris WH, Krushell RJ, Galante JO. Results of cementless revisions of total hip arthroplasties using the Harris-Galante prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; 235: 120-126
17. Malkani AL, Lewallen DG, Cabanela ME, Wallrichs SL. Femoral component revision using an uncemented, proximally coated, long-stem prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 1996; 11: 411-418
18. Mulliken BD, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB. Uncemented revision total hip arthroplasty: a 4-to-6-year review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; 325: 156-162
19. Pellicci PM, Wilson PD Jr, Sledge CB, Salvati EA, Ranawat CS, Poss R, Callaghan JJ. Long-term results of revision total hip replacement. A follow-up report. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1985; 67: 513-516
20. Peters CL, Rivero DP, Kull LR, Jacobs JJ, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO. Revision total hip arthroplasty without cement: subsidence of proximally porous-coated femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1995; 77: 1217-1226
21. Woolson ST, Delaney TJ. Failure of a proximally porous-coated femoral prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1995; 10 (Suppl): S22-S28
22. Crawford CH, Malkani AL, Incavo SJ, Morris HB, Krupp RJ, Baker D. Femoral component revision using an extensively hydroxyapatite-coated stem. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19: 8-13
23. Engh CA Jr, McAuley JP, Sychterz CJ, Sacco ME, Engh CA Sr. The accuracy and reproducibility of radiographic assessment of stress-shielding. A postmortem analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2000; 82: 1414-1420
24. Sugimura T, Tohkura A. THA revision with extensively porous-coated stems. 32 hips followed 2-6.5 years. Acta Orthop Scand 1998; 69: 11-13
25. Incavo SJ, Johnson CC, Churchill DL, Beynnon BD. Bending stiffness, torsional stability, and insertion force of cementless femoral stems. Am J Orthop 2001; 30: 323-327
26. Gie GA, Linder L, Ling RS, Simon JP, Slooff TJ, Timperley AJ. Impacted cancellous allografts and cement for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1993; 75: 14-21
27. Gokhale S, Soliman A, Dantas JP, Richardson JB, Cook F, Kuiper JH, Jones P. Variables affecting initial stability of impaction grafting for hip revision. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 432: 174-180
28. Kelly SJ, Incavo SJ, Beynnon B. The use of a hydroxyapatite-coated primary stem in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21: 64-71
29. Kim YH. Cementless revision hip arthroplasty using strut allografts and primary cementless proximal porous-coated prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19: 573-581
30. Lawrence JM, Engh CA, Macalino GE. Revision total hip arthroplasty. Long-term results without cement. Orthop Clin North Am 1993; 24: 635-644
31. Goodman SB, Oh KJ, Imrie S, Hwang K, Shegog M. Revision total hip arthroplasty in juvenile chronic arthritis: 17 revisions in 11 patients followed for 4-12 years. Acta Orthop 2006; 77: 242-250
32. Chmell MJ, Scott RD, Thomas WH, Sledge CB. Total hip arthroplasty with cement for juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Results at a minimum of ten years in patients less than thirty years old. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1997; 79: 44-52
33. Scott RD, Sarokhan AJ, Dalziel R. Total hip and total knee arthroplasty in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1984; 182: 90-98
34. Lachiewicz PF, McCaskill B, Inglis A, Ranawat CS, Rosenstein BD. Total hip arthroplasty in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Two to eleven-year results. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1986; 68: 502-508
35. Torchia ME, Klassen RA, Bianco AJ. Total hip arthroplasty with cement in patients less than twenty years old. Long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1996; 78: 995-1003
36. Maric Z, Haynes RJ. Total hip arthroplasty in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993; 290: 197-199
37. Haber D, Goodman SB. Total hip arthroplasty in juvenile chronic arthritis: a consecutive series. J Arthroplasty 1998; 13: 259-265
38. Eingartner C, Heigele T, Dieter J, Winter E, Weise K. Long-term results with the Bicontact system - aspects to investigate and to learn from. Int Orthop 2003; 27 (Suppl 1): S11-S15
39. Eingartner C, Volkmann R, Winter E, Maurer F, Sauer G, Weller S, Weise K. Results of an uncemented straight femoral shaft prosthesis after 9 years of follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15: 440-447
40. Weller S. Fifteen years of experience with the Bicontact hip endoprosthesis system - the past, the present, the future. What has been achieved? Int Orthop 2003; 27 (Suppl 1): S2-S6
41. Proceedings of the International Bicontact Experts meeting. San Diego, California, USA, August 28, 2002. Int Orthop 2003; 27 (Suppl 1): S1-46
42. Jager M, Endres S, Wilke A. [Total hip replacement in childhood, adolescence and young patients: a review of the literature] Hü ftgelenkersatz im Kindes-, Jugend- und frühen Erwachsenenalter: Eine Literaturübersicht. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2004; 142: 194-212
43. Temmerman OP, Raijmakers PG, Berkhof J, Hoekstra OS, Teule GJ, Heyligers IC. Accuracy of diagnostic imaging techniques in the diagnosis of aseptic loosening of the femoral component of a hip prosthesis: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005; 87: 781-785