Accuracy of diagnostic imaging techniques in the diagnosis of aseptic loosening of the femoral component of a hip prosthesis

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 87, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 781-785

  Temmerman, O P P ^a   Raijmakers, P G H M ^a   Berkhof, J ^a,b   Hoekstra, O S ^a   Teule, G J J ^a   Heyligers, I C ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Sittard Geleen Heerlen   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTHROGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BONE SCINTISCANNING; CLINICAL TRIAL; COCHRANE LIBRARY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; HIP PROSTHESIS; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; META ANALYSIS; MORBIDITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RISK REDUCTION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

ARTHROGRAPHY; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 20844431719     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B6.15625     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Ahnfelt L, Herberts P, Malchau H, Andersson GB. Prognosis of total hip replacement: a swedish multicenter study of 4,664 revisions. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 1990; 238:1-26.
2. Davis CM 3rd, Berry DJ, Harmsen WS. Cemented revision of failed uncemented femoral components of total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2003;85-A: 1264-9.
3. Ginai AZ, van Biezen FC, Kint PA, Oei HY, Hop WC. Digital subtraction arthrography in preoperative evaluation of painful total hip arthroplasty. Skeletal Radiol 1996;25:357-63.
4. Hendrix RW, Wixson RL, Rana NA, Rogers LF. Arthrography after total hip arthroplasty: a modified technique used in the diagnosis of pain. Radiology 1983;148: 647-52.
5. Lieberman JR, Huo MH, Schneider R, Salvati EA, Rodi S. Evaluation of painful hip arthroplasties: are technetium bone scans necessary? J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1993; 75-B:475-8.
6. Koster G, Munz DL, Kohler HP. Clinical value of combined contrast and radionuclide arthrography in suspected loosening of hip prostheses. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1993;112:247-54.
7. Oyen WJ, Claessens H, van Horn JR, et al. Nuclear arthrography: a scintigraphic contribution to the evaluation of loosening of total hip prostheses. J Nucl Med 1990; 31:712.
8. Miniaci A, Bailey WH, Bourne RB, McLaren AC, Rorabeck CH. Analysis of radionuclide arthrograms, radiographic arthrograms, and sequential plain radiographs in the assessment of painful hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1990;5:143-9.
9. Pfahler M, Schidlo C, Refior HJ. Evaluation of imaging in loosening of hip arthroplasty in 326 consecutive cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1998;117:205-7.
10. Weiss PE, Mall JC, Hoffer PB, et al. 99mTc methylene diphosphonate bone imaging in the evaluation of total hip prostheses. Radiology 1979;133:727-9.
11. Barentsz JO, Lemmens JM, Sloof TJ. The use of subtraction arthrography in total hip arthroplasties. ROFO 1986;144:440-6.
12. Barrack RL. Assessment of the symptomatic total hip. Orthopedics 1994;17:793-5.
13. Cain TM, Fon GT, Brumby S, Howie DW. Plain film and arthrographic findings in painful total hip arthroplasties with surgical correlation. Australas Radiol 1990;34: 211-18.
14. Cheung A, Lachiewicz PF, Renner JB. The role of aspiration and contrast-enhanced arthrography in evaluating the uncemented hip arthroplasty. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;168:1305-9.
15. Li DJ, Miles KA, Wraight EP. Bone scintigraphy of hip prostheses: can analysis of patterns of abnormality improve accuracy? Clin Nucl Med 1994;19:112-15.
16. Deville WL, Buntinx F, Bouter LM, et al. Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines. BMC Med Res Methodol 2002;2:9.
17. The Cochrane Methods Group on Screening and Diagnostic Tests. http:www.cochrane.org/sadt/index.htm (accessed 14/04/05).
18. Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation. http:www.cebm.net (accessed 16/03/05).
19. Midgette AS, Stukel TA, Littenberg B. A meta-analytic method for summarizing diagnostic test performances: receiver operating-characteristic-summary point estimates. Med Decis Making 1993;13:253-7.
20. Littenberg B, Moses LE. Estimating diagnostic accuracy from multiple reports: a new meta-analytic method. Med Decis Making 1993;13:313-21.
21. Galbraith RF. A note on graphical presentation of estimated odds ratios from several clinical trials. Stat Med 1988;7:889-94.
22. Fleiss JL. The statistical basis of meta-analysis. Stat Methods Med Res 1993;2: 121-45.
23. Ovesen O, Riegels-Nielsen P, Lindequist S, et al. The diagnostic value of digital subtraction arthrography and radionuclide bone scan in revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2003;18:735-40.
24. Oyen WJ, Lemmens JA, Claessens RA, et al. Nuclear arthrography: combined scintigraphic and radiographic procedure for diagnosis of total hip prosthesis loosening. J Nucl Med 1996;37:62-70.
25. Swan JS, Braunstein EM, Wellman HN, Capello W. Contrast and nuclear arthrography in loosening of the uncemented hip prosthesis. Skeletal Radiol 1991;20: 15-19.
26. Lyons CW, Berquist TH, Lyons JC, Rand JA, Brown ML. Evaluation of radiographic findings in painful hip arthroplasties. Clin Orthop 1985;195:239-51.
27. O'Neill DA, Harris WH. Failed total hip replacement: assessment by plain radiographs, arthrograms, and aspiration of the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1984; 66-A:540-6.
28. Herzwurm PJ, Ebert FR. Arthroscintography for detection of femoral component loosening. J Arthroplasty 1991;6:327-33.
29. Resnik CS, Fratkin MJ, Cardea JA. Arthroscintigraphic evaluation of the painful total hip prosthesis. Clin Nucl Med 1986;11:242-4.
30. Pearlman AW. The painful hip prosthesis: value of nuclear imaging in the diagnosis of late complications. Clin Nucl Med 1980;5:133-42.
31. Uri G, Wellman H, Capello W, Robb J, Greenman G. Scintigraphic and x-ray arthrographic diagnosis of femoral prosthesis loosening: concise communication. J Nucl Med 1984;25:661-3.
32. Tehranzadeh J, Schneider R, Freiberger RH. Radiological evaluation of painful total hip replacement. Radiology 1981;141:355-62.
33. Gelman MI, Coleman RE, Stevens PM, Davey BW. Radiography, radionuclide imaging, and arthrography in the evaluation of total hip and knee replacement. Radiology 1978;128:677-82.
34. Williamson BR, McLaughlin RE, Wang GW, et al. Radionuclide bone imaging as a means of differentiating loosening and infection in patients with a painful total hip prosthesis. Radiology 1979;133:723-5.
35. Capello WN, Uri BG, Wellman HN, Robb JA, Stiver PL. Comparison of radiographic and radionuclide hip arthrography in determination of femoral component loosening of hip arthroplasties. Hip 1985:157-68.
36. Tehranzadeh J, Gubernick I, Blaha D. Prospective study of sequential technetium-99m phosphate and gallium imaging in painful hip prostheses (comparison of diagnostic modalities). Clin Nucl Med 1988;13:229-36.
37. Maxon HR, Schneider HJ, Hopson CN, et al. A comparative study of indium-111 DTPA radionuclide and iothalamate meglumine roentgenographic arthrography in the evaluation of painful total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1989;245:156-9.
38. Walker CW, FitzRandolph RL, Collins ON, Dalrymple GV. Arthrography of painful hips following arthroplasty: digital versus plain film subtraction. Skeletal Radiol 1991;20:403-7.
39. Phillips WC, Kattapuram SV. Prosthetic hip replacements: plain films and arthrography for component loosening. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1982;138:677-82.
40. Rosenthall L, Aldis AE. Radiophosphate evaluation of loose hip prostheses. J Can Assoc Radiol 1985;36:189-93.
41. Williams F, McCall IW, Park WM, O'Connor BT, Morris V. Gallium-67 scanning in the painful total hip replacement. Clin Radiol 1981;32:431-9.
42. Rosenthall L, Aldis AE, Hill RO. Combined radionuclide and radiocontrast arthrography for evaluating hip arthroplasty. Eur J Nucl Med 1985;10:531-4.
43. Warner JJ, Becker GJ, Robb JA, Holden RW. Digital subtraction arthrography following hip arthroplasty. Applied Radiology 1986;15:59-71.
44. Prentice RL. Correlated binary regression with covariates specific to each binary observation. Biometrics 1988;44:1033-48.
45. Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S, et al. Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA 1999;282:1061-6.