Processing presupposed content

Journal of Semantics

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 373-416

  Schwarz, Florian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35948951936     PISSN: 01675133     EISSN: 14774593     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jos/ffm011     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Abusch, D. (2005), Triggering from Alternative Sets and Projection of Pragmatic Presuppositions. Unpublished manuscript, Cornell University.
2. Bader, M. & M. Meng (1999), 'Subject-object ambiguities in German embedded clauses: An across-the-board comparison'. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 28:121-43.
3. Beaver, D. (1997), 'Presupposition'. In J-van Benthem and A.ter Meulen(eds.), The Handbook of Logic and Language. Elsevier. Amsterdam. 939-1008.
4. Beaver, D. (2001), Presupposition and Assertion in Dynamic Semantics CSLI Publications. Stanford, CA.
5. Beaver, D. & H. Zeevat (2007), 'Accommodation'. In G. Ramchand and C. Reiss (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces. Oxford University Press. Cambridge, 503-38.
6. beim Graben, P., J. D. Saddy, M. Schlesewsky, & J. Kurths (2000), 'Symbolic dynamics of event-related brain potentials'. Physical Review 62: 5518-41.
7. Chambers, C. & V. S. Juan (2005), 'Accommodation and the interpretation of presupposition during referential processing'. Poster presented at the 18th CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing. The University of Arizona.
8. Christianson, K., A. Hohingworth, J. F. Halliwell, & F. Ferreira (2001), 'Thematic-roles assigned along the garden path linger'. Cognitive Psychology 42:368-407.
9. Crain, S. & M. Steedman (1985), 'On not being led up the garden path: the use of context by the psychological parser'. In D. R. Dowry, L. Karttunen, and A. Zwicky (eds.), Natural Language Parsing: Psychological, Computational, and Theoretical Perspectives. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. 320-58.
10. Frazier, L. (2006), The Big Fish in a Small Pond: Accommodation and the Processing of Novel Definites. Unpublished manuscript, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
11. Geurts, B. (1999), Presuppositions and Pronouns. Elsevier. Amsterdam, New York. [Includes bibliographical references ([223]-9) and indexes].
12. Heim, I. (1982), The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts. Amherst, MA.
13. Heim, I. (1983a), 'File change semantics and the familiarity theory of definiteness'. In R. Baeuerle, R. Schwarze, and A. von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language. De Gruyter. Berlin. 164-89.
14. Heim, I. (1983b), 'On the projection problem for presuppositions', In D. Flickinger, et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Second West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Stanford University. 114-25.
15. Heim, I. (1992), 'Presupposition projection and the semantics of attitude verbs'. Journal of Semantics 9:183-221.
16. Hemforth, B. (1993), Kognitives Parsing: Repräsentation und Verarbeitung grammatischen Wissens. Infix. Sankt Augustin.
17. Kamp, H. (1981), 'A theory of truth and semantic representation'. In J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen, and M. Stokhof (eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language: Proceedings of the Third Amsterdam Colloquium, vol. 1. Mathematical Center. Amsterdam. 227-321.
18. Kamp, H. & U. Reyle (1993), From Discourse to Logic. Kluwer. Dordrecht.
19. Karttunen, L. (1973), 'Presuppositions of compound sentences'. Linguistic Inquiry 4:169-93.
20. Karttunen, L. (1974), 'Presupposition and linguistic context'. Theoretical Linguistics 1:181-94.
21. Karttunen, L. & S. Peters (1979), 'Conventional implicature'. Syntax and Semantics 11: Presupposition. Academic Press. New York. 1-56.
22. Kim, A. & L. Osterhout (2005), 'The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials'. Journal of Memory and Language 52:205-25.
23. Krifka, M. (1999), 'Additive particles under stress'. In SALT. CLC Publications. Ithaca, NY. 111-28.
24. Kripke, S. (1991), Presupposition and Anaphora: Remarks on the Formulation of the Projection Problem. Unpublished manuscript, Princeton University.
25. Lewis, D. (1979), 'Scorekeeping in a language game'. In R. Baeuerle, U. Egli, and A. von Stechow (eds.), Semantics from Different Points of View. Springer. Berlin. 172-87.
26. Noveck, I. & D. Sperber (eds.) (2004), Experimental Pragmatics. Palgrave Macmillan. Basingstoke.
27. Schlesewsky, M. & A. Friederici (2003), 'Sentence processing mechanisms'. In L. Nadel (ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. Macmillan Reference. London. 1149-55.
28. Schlesewsky, M., G. Fanselow, R. Kliegl, & J. Krems (2000), 'The subject-preference in the processing of locally ambiguous wh-questions in german'. In B. Hemforth and L. Konieczny (eds.), German Sentence Processing. Kluwer. Dordrecht. 65-93.
29. Schwarz, F. (2006), 'Presuppositions in Processing - a case study of German auch'. In C. Ebert and C. Endriss (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 10. ZAS. Berlin. 301-15.
30. Simons, M. (2001), 'On the conversational basis of some presuppositions'. In R. Hastings, B. Jackson and Z. Zvolensky (eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 11. CLC Publications. Ithaca, NY. 427-46.
31. Spenader, J. (2002), Presuppositions in Spoken Discourse. Ph.D. thesis, Computational Linguistics, University of Stockholm.
32. Stalnaker, R. (1973), 'Presuppositions'. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2: 447-57.
33. Stalnaker, R. (1974), 'Pragmatic presuppositions'. In M. Munitz and P. Unger (eds.), Semantics and Philosophy. New York University Press. New York. 197-214.
34. van Berkum, J. J. A., C. M. Brown, & P. Hagoort (1999), 'Early referential context effects in sentence processing: Evidence from event-related brain potentials'. Journal of Memory and Language 41:147-82.
35. van Berkum, J. J. A., C. M. Brown, P. Hagoort, & P. Zwitserlood (2003), 'Event-related brain potentials reflect discourse-referential ambiguity in spoken language comprehension'. Psychophysiology 40 235-48.
36. van der Sandt, R. (1988), Context and Presupposition. Croom Helm. London.
37. van der Sandt, R. & B. Geurts (2001), 'Too', In P. Dekker and R. van Rooy (eds.), 13th Amsterdam Colloquium. 180-5.
38. van der Sandt, R. A. (1992), 'Presupposition projection as anaphora resolution'. Journal of Semantics 9:333-77.
39. van Rooy, R. (1999), 'Against local accommodation'. In M. K. Bart Geurts and R. van der Sandi (eds.), Focus and Presupposition in Multispeaker Discourse. Workshop held at the 11th European Summer School in Logic, Language, and Information. ESSLI. Amsterdam.
40. von Fintel, K. (2004), 'Would you believe it? The king of France is back! (presupositions and truth-value intuitions)'. In M. Reimer and A. Bezuidenhout (eds.), Descriptions and Beyond. Oxford University Press. Oxford. 315-41.