Wall shear stress gradient analysis within an idealized stenosis using non-newtonian flow

Neurosurgery

Volumn 61, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 853-863

  Schirmer, Clemens M ^a   Malek, Adel M ^a,b  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Atherosclerosis; Endothelium; Fluid dynamics; Stenosis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLOOD VISCOSITY; CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FLOW RATE; HEART CYCLE; HEART VENTRICLE ENDDIASTOLIC PRESSURE; HUMAN; LAMINAR FLOW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHEAR STRESS; STENOSIS;

BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CAROTID STENOSIS; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; SHEAR STRENGTH; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 35948935255     PISSN: 0148396X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000298915.32248.95     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Ahmed SA, Giddens DP: Pulsatile poststenotic flow studies with laser Doppler anemometry. J Biomech 17:695-705, 1984.
2. Anonymous: Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 325:445-453, 1991.
3. Asakura T, Karino T: Flow patterns and spatial distribution of atherosclerotic lesions in human coronary arteries. Circ Res 66:1045-1066, 1990.
4. Bao X, Lu C, Frangos JA: Temporal gradient in shear but not steady shear stress induces PDGF-A and MCP-1 expression in endothelial cells: Role of NO, NF kappa B, and egr-1. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 19:996-1003, 1999.
5. Beratlis N, Balaras E, Parvinian B, Kiger K: A numerical and experimental investigation of transitional pulsatile flow in a stenosed channel. J Biomech Eng 127:1147-1157, 2005.
6. Bird RB, Armstrong RC, Hassager O: Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids. New York, Wiley, 1987.
7. Botnar R, Rappitsch G, Scheidegger MB, Liepsch D, Perktold K, Boesiger P: Hemodynamics in the carotid artery bifurcation: A comparison between numerical simulations and in vitro MRI measurements. J Biomech 33:137-144, 2000.
8. Buchanan JR, Kleinstreuer C, Comer JK: Rheological effects on pulsatile hemodynamics in a stenosed tube. Comput Fluids 29:695-724, 2000.
9. Calamante F, Yim PJ, Cebral JR: Estimation of bolus dispersion effects in perfusion MRI using image-based computational fluid dynamics. Neuroimage 19:341-353, 2003.
10. Cassanova RA, Giddens DP: Disorder distal to modeled stenoses in steady and pulsatile flow. J Biomech 11:441-453, 1978.
11. Chien S, Usami S, Dellenback RJ, Gregersen MI: Shear-dependent deformation of erythrocytes in rheology of human blood. Am J Physiol 219:136-142, 1970.
12. Choi HW, Barakat AI: Numerical study of the impact of non-Newtonian blood behavior on flow over a two-dimensional backward facing step. Biorheology 42:493-509, 2005.
13. Dai G, Kaazempur-Mofrad MR, Natarajan S, Zhang Y, Vaughn S, Blackman BR, Kamm RD, Garcia-Cardena G, Gimbrone MA Jr: Distinct endothelial phenotypes evoked by arterial waveforms derived from atherosclerosis-susceptible and -resistant regions of human vasculature. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:14871-14876, 2004.
14. De Keulenaer GW, Chappell DC, Ishizaka N, Nerem RM, Alexander RW, Griendling KK: Oscillatory and steady laminar shear stress differentially affect human endothelial redox state: Role of a superoxide-producing NADH oxidase. Circ Res 82:1094-1101, 1998.
15. DePaola N, Davies PF, Pritchard WF Jr, Florez L, Harbeck N, Polacek DC: Spatial and temporal regulation of gap junction connexin43 in vascular endothelial cells exposed to controlled disturbed flows in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:3154-3159, 1999.
16. DePaola N, Gimbrone MA Jr, Davies PF, Dewey CF Jr: Vascular endothelium responds to fluid shear stress gradients. Arterioscler Thromb 12:1254-1257, 1992.
17. Dimmeler S, Hermann C, Galle J, Zeiher AM: Upregulation of superoxide dismutase and nitric oxide synthase mediates the apoptosis-suppressive effects of shear stress on endothelial cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 19:656-664, 1999.
18. Fluent: FLUENT 6.2 User's Guide. Lebanon, Fluent, Inc., 2005.
19. Fry DL: Acute vascular endothelial changes associated with increased blood velocity gradients. Circ Res 22:165-197, 1968.
20. Fukushima T, Azuma T: The horseshoe vortex: A secondary flow generated in arteries with stenosis, bifurcation, and branchings. Biorheology 19:143-154, 1982.
21. Garcia-Cardena G, Comander J, Anderson KR, Blackman BR, Gimbrone MA Jr: Biomechanical activation of vascular endothelium as a determinant of its functional phenotype. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:4478-4485, 2001.
22. Ghalichi F, Deng X, De Champlain A, Douville Y, King M, Guidoin R: Low Reynolds number turbulence modeling of blood flow in arterial stenoses. Biorheology 35:281-294, 1998.
23. Giddens DP, Mabon RF, Cassanova RA: Measurements of disordered flows distal to subtotal vascular stenoses in the thoracic aortas of dogs. Circ Res 39:112-119, 1976.
24. Giddens DP, Zarins CK, Glagov S: The role of fluid mechanics in the localization and detection of atherosclerosis. J Biomech Eng 115:588-594, 1993.
25. Gijsen FJ, Allanic E, van de Vosse FN, Janssen JD: The influence of the non-Newtonian properties of blood on the flow in large arteries: Unsteady flow in a 90 degrees curved tube. J Biomech 32:705-713, 1999.
26. Gijsen FJ, van de Vosse FN, Janssen JD: The influence of the non-Newtonian properties of blood on the flow in large arteries: Steady flow in a carotid bifurcation model. J Biomech 32:601-608, 1999.
27. Gimbrone MA Jr, Resnick N, Nagel T, Khachigian LM, Collins T, Topper JN: Hemodynamics, endothelial gene expression, and atherogenesis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 811:1-11, 1997.
28. Glor FP, Ariff B, Crowe LA, Hughes AD, Cheong PL, Thom SA, Verdonck PR, Firmin DN, Barratt DC, Xu XY: Carotid geometry reconstruction: A comparison between MRI and ultrasound. Med Phys 30:3251-3261, 2003.
29. Holdsworth DW, Norley CJ, Frayne R, Steinman DA, Rutt BK: Characterization of common carotid artery blood-flow waveforms in normal human subjects. Physiol Meas 20:219-240, 1999.
30. Kohler U, Marshall I, Robertson MB, Long Q, Xu XY, Hoskins PR: MRI measurement of wall shear stress vectors in bifurcation models and comparison with CFD predictions. J Magn Reson Imaging 14:563-573, 2001.
31. Leung JH, Wright AR, Cheshire N, Crane J, Thom SA, Hughes AD, Xu Y: Fluid structure interaction of patient specific abdominal aortic aneurysms: A comparison with solid stress models. Biomed Eng Online 5:33, 2006.
32. Long Q, Xu XY, Ariff B, Thom SA, Hughes AD, Stanton AV: Reconstruction of blood flow patterns in a human carotid bifurcation: A combined CFD and MRI study. J Magn Reson Imaging 11:299-311, 2000.
33. Malek AM, Alper SL, Izumo S: Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. JAMA 282:2035-2042, 1999.
34. Malek AM, Izumo S: Mechanism of endothelial cell shape change and cytoskeletal remodeling in response to fluid shear stress. J Cell Sci 109:713-726, 1996.
35. Mazzolai L, Silacci P, Bouzourene K, Daniel F, Brunner H, Hayoz D: Tissue factor activity is upregulated in human endothelial cells exposed to oscillatory shear stress. Thromb Haemost 87:1062-1068, 2002.
36. Moore JA, Steinman DA, Holdsworth DW, Ethier CR: Accuracy of computational hemodynamics in complex arterial geometries reconstructed from magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Biomed Eng 27:32-41, 1999.
37. Nagel T, Resnick N, Dewey CF Jr, Gimbrone MA Jr: Vascular endothelial cells respond to spatial gradients in fluid shear stress by enhanced activation of transcription factors. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 19:1825-1834, 1999.
38. Perktold K, Resch M, Florian H: Pulsatile non-Newtonian flow characteristics in a three-dimensional human carotid bifurcation model. J Biomech Eng 113:464-475, 1991.
39. Phelps JE, DePaola N: Spatial variations in endothelial barrier function in disturbed flows in vitro. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 278:H469-H476, 2000.
40. Ryval J, Straatman AG, Steinman DA: Two-equation turbulence modeling of pulsatile flow in a stenosed tube. J Biomech Eng 126:625-635, 2004.
41. Saqqur M, Demchuk AM, Hill MD, Dean N, Schebel M, Kennedy J, Barber PA, Shuaib A: Bedside emergency transcranial Doppler diagnosis of severe carotid disease using orbital window examination. J Neuroimaging 15:138-143, 2005.
42. Seo T, Schachter LG, Barakat AI: Computational study of fluid mechanical disturbance induced by endovascular stents. Ann Biomed Eng 33:444-456, 2005.
43. Stone PH, Coskun AU, Kinlay S, Clark ME, Sonka M, Wahle A, Ilegbusi OJ, Yeghiazarians Y, Popma JJ, Orav J, Kuntz RE, Feldman CL: Effect of endothelial shear stress on the progression of coronary artery disease, vascular remodeling, and in-stent restenosis in humans: In vivo 6-month follow-up study. Circulation 108:438-444, 2003.
44. Stroud JS, Berger SA, Saloner D: Numerical analysis of flow through a severely stenotic carotid artery bifurcation. J Biomech Eng 124:9-20, 2002.
45. Tang D, Yang C, Kobayashi S, Ku DN: Steady flow and wall compression in stenotic arteries: Athree-dimensional thick-wall model with fluid-wall interactions. J Biomech Eng 123:548-557, 2001.
46. Tardy Y, Resnick N, Nagel T, Gimbrone MA Jr, Dewey CF Jr: Shear stress gradients remodel endothelial monolayers in vitro via a cell proliferation-migration-loss cycle. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 17:3102-3106, 1997.
47. Thomas JB, Milner JS, Rutt BK, Steinman DA: Reproducibility of image-based computational fluid dynamics models of the human carotid bifurcation. Ann Biomed Eng 31:132-141, 2003.
48. Thurston GB: Frequency and shear rate dependence of viscoelasticity of human blood. Biorheology 10:375-381, 1973.
49. Thurston GB: Rheological parameters for the viscosity viscoelasticity and thixotropy of blood. Biorheology 16:149-162, 1979.
50. Varghese SS, Frankel SH: Numerical modeling of pulsatile turbulent flow in stenotic vessels. J Biomech Eng 125:445-460, 2003.
51. Womersley JR: Method for the calculation of velocity, rate of flow and viscous drag in arteries when the pressure gradient is known. J Physiol 127:553-563, 1955.