Interspersing easy math problems among challenging problems: Detection of interspersal effects in whole-class applications

Journal of Behavioral Education

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 342-354

  McDonald, Erin ^a   Ardoin, Scott P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Discrete task completion hypothesis; Fluency; Interspersal; Math intervention

Indexed keywords

EID: 35649015451     PISSN: 10530819     EISSN: 15733513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10864-007-9046-x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Billington, E. J., & Skinner, C. H. (2002). Getting students to choose to do more work: Evidence of the effectiveness of the interspersal procedure. Journal of Behavioral Education, 11, 105-116.
2. Billington, E. J., Skinner, C. H., & Cruchon, N. M. (2004). Improving sixth-grade students perceptions of high-effort assignments by assigning more work: Interaction of additive interspersal and assignment effort on assignment choice. Journal of School Psychology, 42, 477-490.
3. Calhoon, M. B., & Fuchs, L. S. (2003). The effects of peer-assisted learning strategies and curriculum-based measurement on the mathematics performance of secondary students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 235-245.
4. Cates, G. L., & Skinner, C. H. (2000). Getting remedial math students to prefer homework with 20% and 40% more problems: An investigation of the strength of the interspersing procedure. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 339-347.
5. Clark, S. L., & Rhymer, K. N. (2003). Student preference for explicit timing and interspersal procedures as a function of math problem completion rates: Testing the discrete task completion hypothesis. Journal of Behavioral Education, 12, 275-286.
6. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
7. Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
8. Deno, S. L., & Mirkin, P. K. (1977). Data-based program modification: A manual. Restin, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
9. Hawkins, J., Skinner, C. H., & Oliver, R. (2005). The effects of task demands and additive interspersal ratios on fifth-grade students' mathematics accuracy. School Psychology Review, 34, 543-555.
10. Johns, G. A., Skinner, C. H., & Nail, G. L. (2000). Effects of interspersing briefer mathematics problems on assignment choice in students with learning disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 10, 95-106.
11. Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
12. Kratochwill, T. R., & Stoiber, K. C. (2002). Evidence-based interventions in school psychology: Conceptual foundations of the procedural coding manual of Division and the Society for the Study of School Psychology Task Force. School Psychology Quarterly, 17, 341-389.
13. Logan, P., & Skinner, C. H. (1998). Improving students' perceptions of a mathematics assignments by increasing problem completion rates: Is problem completing a reinforcing event? School Psychology Quarterly, 13, 322-331.
14. McCurdy, M., Skinner, C. H., Grantham, K., Watson, T. S., & Hindman, P. M. (2001). Increasing on-task behavior in an elementary student during mathematics seatwork by interspersing additional brief problems. School Psychology Review, 30, 23-32.
15. Meadows, S. F., & Skinner, C. H. (2005). Causing students to choose more Language Arts Work: Enhancing the Educational and External Validity of the Additive Interspersal Procedure and Discrete Task Completion Hypothesis. Journal of Behavioral Education, 14, 227-247.
16. Montarello, S., & Martens, B. K. (2005). Effects of interspersed brief problems on students' endurance at completing math work. Journal of Behavioral Education, 14, 249-266.
17. Shinn, M. R. (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York NY: Guilford Press.
18. Skinner, C. H. (2002). An empirical analysis of interspersal research: Evidence, implications, and applications of the discrete task completion hypothesis. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 347-368.
19. Skinner, C. H., Fletcher, P. A., & Wildmon, M. (1996). Improving assignment preference through interspersing additional problems: Brief versus easy problems. Journal of Behavioral Education, 6, 427-436.
20. Skinner, C. H., Hall-Johnson, K., Skinner, A. L., Cates, G. L., Weber, J., & Johns, G. A. (1999). Enhancing perceptions of mathematics assignments by increasing relative problem completion rates through the interspersal technique. The Journal of Experimental Education, 68, 43-59.
21. Skinner, C. H., Hurst, K.L, Teeple, D. F., & Meadows, S. O. (2002). Increasing on-task behavior during mathematics independent seat-work in students with emotional disturbance by interspersing additional brief problems. Psychology in the Schools, 39, 647-659.
22. Skinner, C. H., Robinson, S. L., Johns, G. A., Logan, P., & Belfiore, P. J. (1996). Applying Herrnstein's Matching Law to influence students' choice to complete difficult academic tasks. The Journal of Experimental Education, 65, 5-17.
23. Wallace, M. A., Cox, E. A., & Skinner, C. H. (2003). Increasing independent seatwork: Breaking large assignments into smaller assignments and teaching a student with retardation to recruit reinforcement. School Psychology Review, 32, 132-142.
24. Wildmon, M. E., Skinner, C. H., & McDade, A. (1998). Interspersing additional brief, easy problems to increase assignment preference on mathematics reading problems. Journal of Behavioral Education, 8, 337-346.
25. Wildmon, M. E., Skinner, C. H., Watson, T. S., & Garrett, L. S. (2004). Enhancing assignment perceptions in students with mathematics learning disabilities by including more work: An extension of interspersal research. School Psychology Quarterly, 19, 106-120.
26. Wright, J. (2004). Math worksheet generator. Retrieved January, 2004 from www.interventioncentral.com.