Effects of interspersed brief problems on students' endurance at completing math work

Journal of Behavioral Education

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 249-266

  Montarello, Staci ^a   Martens, Brian K ^a  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Alternating treatments design; Endurance; Interspersal; Math computation; Token reinforcement

Indexed keywords

EID: 29044435644     PISSN: 10530819     EISSN: 15733513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10864-005-8649-3     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Alberto, P.A., & Troutman, A.C. (2003). Applied Behavior Analysis for Teachers. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
2. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
3. Berkowitz, M. J., & Martens, B. K. (2001). Assessing teachers' and students' preferences for school based reinforcers: Agreement across methods and different effort requirements. Journal of Developmental & Physical Disabilities, 13, 373-387.
4. Binder, C. (1996). Behavioral fluency: Evolution of a new paradigm. The Behavior Analyst, 19, 163-197.
5. Binder, C., Haughton, E., & Van Eyk, D. (1995). Increasing endurance by building fluency: Precision teaching attention span. Journal of Precision Teaching, 12, 29-34.
6. Cates, G. L., & Skinner, C. H. (2000). Getting remedial mathematics students to prefer homework with 20% and 40% more problems. An investigation of the strength of the interspersing procedure. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 339-347.
7. Daly, E. J., Martens, B. K., Hamler, K. R., Dool, E. J., & Eckert, T. L. (1999). A brief experimental analysis for identifying instructional components needed to improve oral reading fluency. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 83-94.
8. Deno, S. L., & Mirkin, P. K. (1977). Data-based program modification: A manual. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
9. Dunlap, G., de Perczel, M., Clarke, S., Wilson, D., Wright, S., White, R., et al. (1994). Choice making to promote adaptive behavior for students with emotional and behavioral challenges. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 505-518.
10. Dunlap, G., & Kern, L. (1996). Modifying instructional activities to promote desirable behavior: A conceptual and practical framework. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 297-312.
11. Dyer, K., Dunlap, G., & Winterling, V. (1990). Effects of choice making on the serious problem behaviors of students with severe handicaps. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 515524.
12. Feather, N. T., & Saville, M. R. (1967). Effects of amount of prior success and failure on expectations of success and subsequent task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 226-232.
13. Gickling, E. E., & Armstrong, D. L. (1978). Levels of instructional difficulty as related to on-task behavior, task completion, and comprehension. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11, 559-566.
14. Johnson, K. R., & Layng, T. V. J. (1996). On terms and procedures: Fluency. The Behavior Analyst, 19, 281-288.
15. Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Motivation as an enabler for academic success. School Psychology Review, 31, 313-327.
16. Logan, P., & Skinner, C. H. (1998). Improving students' perceptions of a mathematics assignment by increasing problem completion rates: Is problem completion a reinforcing event. School Psychology Quarterly, 13, 322-331.
17. Martens, B. K., & Witt, J. C. (2004). Competence, persistence, and success: The positive psychology of behavioral skill instruction. Psychology in the Schools Special Issue: Positive Psychology and Wellness in Children, 41, 19-30.
18. McCurdy, M., Skinner, C. H., Grantham, K., Watson, T. S., & Hindman, P. M. (2001). Increasing on-task behavior in an elementary student during mathematics seat-work by interspersing additional brief problems. School Psychology Review, 30, 23-32.
19. Northup, J., George, T., Jones, K., Broussard, C., & Vollmer, T. R. (1996). A comparison of reinforcer assessment methods: The utility of verbal and pictorial choice procedures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 201-212.
20. Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
21. Richards, S. B., Taylor, R. L., Ramasamy, R., & Richards, R. Y. (1999). Single subject research: Applications in educational and clinical settings. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group, Inc.
22. Shapiro, E. S. (Ed.) (1996). Academic skills problems: Direct assessment and intervention. New York: Guilford Press.
23. Shinn, M. R. (Ed.) (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York: Guilford Press.
24. Shinn, M., & Marston, D. (1985). Differentiating mildly handicapped, low-achieving, and regular education students: A curriculum-based approach. Remedial and Special Education, 6, 31-38.
25. Skinner, C. H. (2002). An empirical analysis of interspersal research evidence, implications, and applications of the discrete task completion hypothesis. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 347-368.
26. Skinner, C. H., Belfiore, P. J., Mace, H. W., Williams-Wilson, S., & Johns, G. A. (1997). Altering response topography to increase response efficiency and learning rates. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 54-64.
27. Skinner, C. H., Hall-Johnson, K., Skinner, A. L., Cates, G., Weber, J., & Johns, G. (1999). Enhancing perceptions of mathematics assignments by increasing relative rates of problem completion through the interspersal technique. Journal of Experimental Education, 68, 43-59.
28. Skinner, C. H., Hurst, K. L., Teeple, D. F., & Meadows, S. O. (2002). Increasing on-task behavior during mathematics independent seat-work in students with emotional disturbance by interspersing additional brief problems. Psychology in the Schools, 39, 647-659.
29. Skinner, C. H., Robinson, S. L., Johns, G. A., Logan, P., & Belfiore, P. J. (1996). Applying Herrnstein's matching law to influence student's choice to complete difficult academic tasks. Journal of Experimental Education, 65, 5-17.
30. Tindal, G., Germann, G., & Deno, S. L. (1983). Descriptive research on the Pine County norms: A direct measurement approach (Research Report No. 123). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
31. Tindal, G., Marston, D., & Deno, S. L. (1983). The reliability of direct and repeated measurement (Research Report No. 109). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
32. Weeks, M., & Gaylord-Ross, R. (1981). Task difficulty and aberrant behavior in severely handicapped students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 449-463.