The impact of expanded general practice-based student teaching: The practices' story

Education for Primary Care

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 593-601

  Quince, Thelma ^a   Benson, John ^a   Hibble, Arthur ^b   Emery, Jon ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b Eastern Deanery   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Community based education; Educational management; General practice; Graduate entry; Primary care; Undergraduate education

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; GENERAL PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT;

EID: 35649005992     PISSN: 14739879     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14739879.2007.11493593     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Department of Health (2004) Medical Schools: delivering the doctors of the future. Department of Health: London.
2. Society for Academic Primary Care (SAPC) (2002) New Century, New Challenges: a report from the heads of departments of general practice and primary care in the medical schools of the United Kingdom. Royal College of General Practitioners: London.
3. Wilson A, Fraser R, McKinley R, Preston-Why te E and Wynn A (1996) Undergraduate teaching in the community: can general practice deliver? British Journal of General Practice 46: 457-60.
4. Bryant P, Hartley S, Coppola W, Berlin A, Modell M and Murray E (2003) Clinical exposure during clinical methods attachments in general practice. Medical Education 37: 790-3.
5. Gray J and Fine B (1997) General practitioner teaching in the community: a study of their teaching experience and interest in undergraduate teaching in the future. British Journal of General Practice 47: 623-6.
6. Coleman K and Murray E (2002) Patients' views and feelings on the community-based teaching of undergraduate medical students: a qualitative study. Family Practice 19:183-8.
7. Department of Health (1998) A First Class Service: quality in the NHS. HMSO: London.
8. Department of Health (2005) Statistics for General Medical Practitioners in England: 1994-2004. Bulletin 2005/02. Department of Health: London.
9. Benson J, Quince T, Hibble A, Fanshawe T and Emery J (2005) Impact on patients of expanded, general practice based, student teaching: observational and qualitative study. BMJ 331: 89-96.
10. Gallagher M, Hares T, Spencer J and Bradshaw C (1993) The nominal group technique: a research tool for general practice. Family Practice 10: 76-81.
11. Hartley S, Macfarlane F, Gantley M and Murray E (1999) Influences on general practitioners of teaching undergraduates: qualitative study of London general practitioner teachers. BMJ 319: 168-71.
12. Haffling AC, Hakansson A and Hagander B (2001) Early patient contact in primary care: a new challenge. Medical Education 35: 901-8.
13. Howe A (2000) Teaching in practice: a qualitative factor analysis of community-based teaching. Medical Education 34: 762-8.
14. Eisner M and Britten N (1999) What do general practice receptionists think and feel about their work? British Journal of General Practice 49: 103-6.
15. McTaggart D, Findlay C and Parkin M (1992) Economics. Addison Wesley: Sydney, pp. 467.
16. Farmer J, Stimpson P and Tucker J (2003) Relative professional roles in antenatal care: results of a survey in Scottish rural general practice. Journal of Interprofessional Care 17: 351-62.
17. Kotter J (1996) Leading Change. Harvard Business School Press: Harvard.
18. Goodman J and Truss C (2004) The medium and the message: communicating effectively during a major change initiative. Journal of Change Management 4: 217-28.