Kernel-based orthogonal projections to latent structures (K-OPLS)

Journal of Chemometrics

Volumn 21, Issue 7-9, 2007, Pages 376-385

  Rantalainen, Mattias ^a   Bylesjö, Max ^b   Cloarec, Olivier ^a   Nicholson, Jeremy K ^a   Holmes, Elaine ^a   Trygg, Johan ^b  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

K OPLS; Kernel methods; Kernel PLS; Non linear; OPLS; OSC; SVM

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS;

KERNEL PLS; KERNEL-BASED ORTHOGONAL PROJECTION TO LATENT STRUCTURE; KERNEL-METHODS; NON LINEAR; ORTHOGONAL PROJECTION; ORTHOGONAL PROJECTION TO LATENT STRUCTURE; OSC; PROJECTION TO LATENT STRUCTURES; SVM;

MATRIX ALGEBRA;

EID: 35648954755     PISSN: 08869383     EISSN: 1099128X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cem.1071     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Wold S, Ruhe A, Wold H, Dunn WJ III. The collinearity problem in linear regression. The partial least squares approach to generalized inverses. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 1984; 5: 735-743.
2. Wold S, Sjöström M, Eriksson L. PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics. Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Syst. 2001; 58: 109-130.
3. Kvalheim OM. The latent variable. Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Syst. 1992; 14: 1-3.
4. Trygg J. O2-PLS for qualitative and quantitative analysis in multivariate calibration. J. Chemometrics 2002; 16: 283-293.
5. Trygg J, Wold S. O2-PLS, a two-block (X-Y) latent variable regression (LVR) method with an integral OSC filter. J. Chemometrics 2003; 17: 53-64.
6. Trygg J, Wold S. Orthogonal projections to latent structures (O-PLS). J. Chemometrics 2002; 16: 119-128.
7. Wold S, Antti H, Lindgren F, Öhman J. Orthogonal signal correction of near-infrared spectra. Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Syst. 1998; 44: 175-185.
8. Wajima T, Fukumura K, Yano Y, Oguma T. Prediction of human clearance from animal data and molecular structural parameters using multivariate regression analysis. J. Pharm. Sci. 2002; 91: 2489-2499.
9. Østby L, Engen S, Melbye A, Eide I. Mutagenicity testing of organic extracts of diesel exhaust particles after fractionation and recombination. Arch. Toxicol. 1997; 71: 314-319.
10. Aizerman M, Braverman E, Rozonoer L. Theoretical foundations of the potential function method in pattern recognition learning. Automat. Rem. Contr. 1964; 25: 821-837.
11. Mercer J. Functions of positive and negative type and their connection with the theory of integral equations. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 1909; A209: 415-446.
12. Shawe-Taylor J, Christiani N. Kernel Methods for Pattern Analysis. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2004.
13. Lindgren F, Geladi P, Wold S. The kernel algorithm for PLS. J. Chemometrics 1993; 7: 45-59.
14. Rännar S, Lindgren F, Geladi P, Wold S. A PLS kernel algorithm for data sets with many variables and fewer objects. Part 1: Theory and algorithm. J. Chemometrics 1994; 8: 111-125.
15. Walczak B, Massart DL. The radial basis functions - partial least squares approach as a flexible non-linear regression technique. Anal. Chim. Acta 1996; 331: 177-185.
16. Rosipal R, Trejo LJ. Kernel partial least squares regression in reproducing kernel Hilbert space. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2002; 2: 97-123.
17. Czekaj T, Wu W, Walczak B. About kernel latent variable approaches and SVM. J. Chemometrics 2005; 19: 341-354.
18. Burges CJC. A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Min. Knowl. Disc. 1998; 2: 121-167.
19. Müller KR, Mika S, Rätsch G, Tsuda K, Schölkopf B. An introduction to kernel-based learning algorithms. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 2001; 12: 181-201.
20. Knorr EM, Ng RT, Tucakov V. Distance-based outliers: algorithms and applications. VLDB J. 2000; 8: 237-253.
21. Berntsson O, Danielsson LG, Lagerholm B, Folestad S. Quantitative in-line monitoring of powder blending by near infrared reflection spectroscopy. Powder Technol. 2002; 123: 185-193.
22. Eriksson L, Johansson E, Kettaneh-Wold N, Trygg J, Wikström C, Wold S. Multi- and Megavariate Data Analysis - Part I Basic Principles and Applications (2nd edn). Umetrics Academy: Umeå, Sweden , 2006.
23. Eriksson L, Toft M, Johansson E, Wold S, Trygg J. Separating Y-predictive and Y-orthogonal variation in multi-block spectral data. J. Chemometrics 2006; 20: 352-361.
24. Barnes RJ, Dhanoa MS, Lister SJ. Standard normal variate transformation and de-trending of near-infrared diffuse reflectance spectra. Appl. Spectr. 1989; 43: 772-777.
25. Jiang JH, Wang JH, Chu X, Yu RQ. Neural network learning to non-linear principal component analysis. Anal. Chim. Acta 1996; 336: 209-222.
26. Zomer S, Brereton RG, Carter JF, Eckers C. Support vector machines for the discrimination of analytical chemical data: application to the determination of tablet production by pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Analyst 2004; 129: 175-181.
27. Zomer S, Guillo C, Brereton RG, Hanna-Brown M. Toxicological classification of urine samples using pattern recognition techniques and capillary electrophoresis. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2004; 378: 2008-2020.
28. Belousov AI, Verzakov SA, von Frese J. A flexible classification approach with optimal generalisation performance: support vector machines. Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Syst. 2002; 64: 15-25.
29. Kim K, Lee JM, Lee IB. A novel multivariate regression approach based on kernel partial least squares with orthogonal signal correction. Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Syst. 2005; 79: 22-30.
30. Bylesjö M, Rantalainen M, Cloarec O, Nicholson JK, Holmes E, Trygg J. OPLS discriminant analysis: combining the strengths of PLS-DA and SIMCA classification. J. Chemometrics 2006; 20: 341-351.
31. Guyon I, Elisseeff A. An introduction to variable and feature selection. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2003; 3: 1157-1182.
32. Guyon I, Weston J, Barnhill S, Vapnik V. Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines. Mach. Learn. 2002; 46: 389-422.