The influence of action perception on object recognition: A developmental study

Developmental Science

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 836-852

  Mounoud, Pierre ^a   Duscherer, Katia ^a   Moy, Guénaël ^a   Perraudin, Sandrine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE; ARTICLE; CHILD; CONCEPT FORMATION; HUMAN; HUMAN DEVELOPMENT; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; RECOGNITION;

AGE FACTORS; CHILD; CONCEPT FORMATION; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMAN DEVELOPMENT; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 35548962330     PISSN: 1363755X     EISSN: 14677687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00624.x     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Arbib, M.A. (2005). From monkey-like action recognition to human language: an evolutionary framework for neurolinguistics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 105 124.
2. Assink, E.M.H., Van Bergen, F., Van Teeseling, H. Knuijt, P.P. (2004). Semantic priming effects in normal versus poor readers. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 165, 67 79.
3. Baldwin, J.M. (1906-1911). Thoughts and things. New York : Macmillan.
4. Behl-Chadha, G. (1996). Basic-level and superordinate-like categorical representations in early infancy. Cognition, 60, 105 141.
5. Bell, B.D. (1994). Pantomime recognition impairment in aphasia: an analysis of error types. Brain and Language, 47, 269 278.
6. Boersma, P. Weenink, D. (2004). Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 4.3.04) [Computer program]. Retrieved 7 September 2004, from http://www.praat.org/.
7. Boronat, C.B., Buxbaum, L.J., Coslett, H.B., Tang, K., Saffran, E.M., Kimberg, D.Y. Detre, J.A. (2005). Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Cognitive Brain Research, 23, 361 373.
8. Chao, L.L. Martin, A. (2000). Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. NeuroImage, 12, 478 484.
9. Chapman, L.J., Chapman, J.P., Curran, T.E. Miller, M.B. (1994). Do children and the elderly show heightened semantic priming? How to answer the question. Developmental Review, 14, 159 185.
10. Craighero, L., Bello, A., Fadiga, L. Rizzolatti, G. (2002). Hand action preparation influences the responses to hand pictures. Neuropsychologia, 40, 492 502.
11. Craighero, L., Fadiga, L., Rizzolatti, G. Umilta, C. (1998). Visuomotor priming. Visual Cognition, 5, 109 125.
12. Creem-Regehr, S.H. Lee, J.N. (2005). Neural representations of graspable objects: are tools special? Cognitive Brain Research, 22, 457 469.
13. Cycowicz, Y.M., Friedman, D., Rothstein, M. Snodgrass, J.G. (1997). Picture naming by young children: norms for name agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 65, 171 237.
14. Damasio, H., Grabowski, T.J., Tranel, D., Ponto, L.L.B., Hichwa, R.D. Damasio, A.R. (2001). Neural correlates of naming actions and naming spatial relations. NeuroImage, 13, 1053 1064.
15. Dapretto, M., Davies, M.S., Pfeifer, J.H., Scott, A.A., Sigman, M., Bookheimer, S.Y. Iacoboni, M. (2006). Understanding emotions in others: mirror neuron dysfunction in children with autism spectrum disorders. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 28 30.
16. De Renzi, E. Lucchelli, F. (1988). Ideational apraxia. Brain, 111, 1173 1185.
17. Della Sala, S., Marchetti, C. Spinnler, H. (1991). Right-sided anarchic (alien) hand: a longitudinal study. Neuropsychologia, 29, 1113 1127.
18. Druks, J. (2002). Verbs and nouns: a review of the literature. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 15, 289 315.
19. Duscherer, K. Holender, D. (2005). The role of decision biases in semantic priming effects. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 64, 249 258.
20. Edwards, M.G., Humphreys, G.W. Castiello, U. (2003). Motor facilitation following action observation: a behavioural study in prehensile action. Brain and Cognition, 53, 495 502.
21. Fecteau, S., Carmant, L., Tremblay, C., Robert, M., Bouthillier, A. Théoret, H. (2004). A motor resonance mechanism in children? Evidence from sub-dural electrodes in a 36-month-old child. NeuroReport, 15, 2625 2627.
22. Ferretti, T.R., McRae, K. Hatherell, A. (2001). Integrating verbs, situations schemas, and schematic role concepts. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 516 547.
23. Gerlach, C., Law, I., Gade, A. Paulson, O.B. (2002). The role of action knowledge in the comprehension of artefacts - a PET study. NeuroImage, 15, 143 152.
24. Gerlach, C., Law, I. Paulson, O.B. (2002). When action turns into words: activation of motor-based knowledge during categorization of manipulable objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 1230 1239.
25. Glover, S. (2004). Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 3 78.
26. Glover, S., Rosenbaum, D.A., Graham, J. Dixon, P. (2004). Grasping the meaning of words. Experimental Brain Research, 154, 103 108.
27. Goodale, M.A. Milner, A.D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in the Neurosciences, 15, 20 25.
28. Greenfield, D.B. Scott, M.S. (1986). Young children's preference for complementary pairs: evidence against a shift to a taxonomic preference. Developmental Psychology, 22, 19 21.
29. Grèzes, J. Decety, J. (2002). Does visual perception of an object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study. Neuropsychologia, 40, 212 222.
30. Grèzes, J., Tucker, M., Armony, J., Ellis, R. Passingham, R.E. (2003). Objects automatically potentiate action: an fMRI study of implicit processing. European Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 2735 2740.
31. Hamzei, F., Rijntjes, M., Dettmers, C., Glauche, V., Weiller, C. Büchel, C. (2003). The human action recognition system and its relationship to Broca's area: an fMRI study. NeuroImage, 19, 637 644.
32. Hay, L. (1981). The effect of amplitude and accuracy requirements on movement time in children. Journal of Motor Behavior, 13, 177 186.
33. Hofer, S.M. Sliwinski, M.J. (2001). Understanding ageing: an evaluation of research designs for assessing the interdependence of ageing-related changes. Gerontology, 47, 341 352.
34. Holender, D. (1992). Expectancy effect, congruity effects, and the interpretation of response latency measurement. In J. Alegria, D. Holender, J. Junca de Morais M. Radeau (Eds.), Analytic approaches to human cognition (pp. 351 375). Amsterdam : North Holland.
35. Lennox, L., Cermak, S. Koomar, J. (1988). Praxis and gesture comprehension in 4-, 5- and 6-year-olds. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 42, 99 104.
36. Lucariello, J., Kyratzis, A. Nelson, K. (1992). Taxonomic knowledge: what kind and when? Child Development, 63, 978 998.
37. Mandler, J.M. (1979). Categorical and schematic organization in memory. In C.R. Puff (Ed.), Memory organization and structure (pp. 259 299). New York : Academic Press.
38. Markman, E.M. (1981). Two different principles of conceptual organization. In M.E. Lamb A.L. Brown (Eds.), Advances in developmental psychology (pp. 199 236). Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
39. Martin, A., Ungerleider, L. Haxby, J. (2000). Category specificity and the brain: the sensory/motor model of semantic representations of objects. In M.S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 1023 1036). Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
40. Martin, A., Wiggs, C., Ungerleider, L. Haxby, J. (1996). Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge. Nature, 379, 649 652.
41. Mizuguchi, T. Sugai, K. (2002). Object-related knowledge and the production of gestures with imagined objects by preschool children. Perception and Motor Skills, 94, 71 79.
42. Moss, H.E. Gaskell, M.G. (1999). Lexical semantic processing during speech. In S. Garrod M. Pickering (Eds.), Language processing (pp. 59 100). Hove, UK : Psychology Press.
43. Moss, H.E., Ostrin, R.K., Tyler, L.K. Marslen-Wilson, W.D. (1995a). Accessing different types of lexical semantic information: evidence from priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 863 883.
44. Moss, H.E., Tyler, L.K., Hodges, J.R. Patterson, K. (1995b). Exploring the loss of semantic memory in semantic dementia: evidence from a primed monitoring study. Neuropsychology, 9, 16 26.
45. Motomura, N. Yamadori, A. (1994). A case of ideational apraxia with impairment of object use and preservation of object pantomime. Cortex, 30, 167 170.
46. Mounoud, P. (1968). Construction et utilisation d'instruments chez l'enfant de 4 à 8 ans: intériorisation des schèmes d'action et types de régulations. Revue Suisse de Psychologie, 27, 200 208.
47. Mounoud, P. (1970). Structuration de l'instrument chez l'enfant. Neuchâtel : Delachaux et Niestlé.
48. Mounoud, P. (1996). A recursive transformation of central cognitive mechanisms: the shift from partial to whole representations. In A.J. Sameroff M.M. Haith (Eds.), The five- to seven-year shift: The age of reason and responsibility (pp. 85 110). Chicago, IL : The University of Chicago Press.
49. Moy, G. Mounoud, P. (2003). Object recognition in young adults: is priming with pantomimes possible? In Catalogue des Abstracts : 8ème Congrès de la Société Suisse de Psychologie (SSP). Berne.
50. Murata, A., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., Raos, V. Rizzolatti, G. (1997). Object representation in the ventral premotor cortex (area F5) of the monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 78, 2226 2230.
51. Myung, J.-Y., Blumstein, S.E. Sedivy, J.C. (2006). Playing on the typewriter, typing on the piano: manipulation knowledge of objects. Cognition, 98, 199 314.
52. Nation, K. Snowling, M.J. (1999). Developmental differences in sensitivity to semantic relations among good and poor comprehenders: evidence from semantic priming. Cognition, 70, B1 B13.
53. Nelson, K. (1988). Where do taxonomic categories come from? Human Development, 31, 3 10.
54. Nguyen, S.P. Murphy, G.L. (2003). An apple is more than just a fruit: cross-classification in children's concepts. Child Development, 74, 1783 1806.
55. Norman, J. (2002). Two visual systems and two theories of perception: an attempt to reconcile the constructivist and ecological approaches. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 73 144.
56. Peigneux, P., Van der Linden, M., Garraux, G., Laureys, S., Degueldre, C., Aerts, J., Del Fiore, G., Moonen, G., Luxen, A. Salmon, E. (2004). Imaging a cognitive model of apraxia: the neural substrate of gesture-specific cognitive processes. Human Brain Mapping, 21, 119 142.
57. Pellizer, G.A. Hauert, C.A. (1996). Visuo-manual aiming movements in 6- to 10-year-old children: evidence for an asymmetric and asynchronous development of information processes. Brain and Cognition, 30, 175 193.
58. Perani, D., Schnur, T., Tettamanti, M., Gorno-Tempini, M., Cappa, S.F. Fazio, F. (1999). Word and picture matching: a PET study of semantic category effects. Neuropsychologia, 37, 293 306.
59. Perraudin, S. Mounoud, P. (2003). Role of functional and categorical relations in adults' conceptual organisation: differentiation between lexical and semantic levels. In T. Bajo J. Lupianez (Eds.), Book of abstracts: XIII Conference of the European Society of Cognitive Psychology (ESCOP) (p. 469). Granada.
60. Perraudin, S. Mounoud, P. (2006). Contribution of the priming paradigm to the understanding of the conceptual developmental shift from 5 to 9 years of age (submitted).
61. Phillips, J.A., Humphreys, G.W., Noppeney, U. Price, C.J. (2002). The neural subtrates of action retrieval: an examination of semantic and visual routes to action. Visual Cognition, 9, 662 684.
62. Piaget, J. (1947). La psychologie de l'intelligence. Paris : A. Colin.
63. Quinn, P.C., Eimas, P.D. Rosenkrantz, S.L. (1993). Evidence for representations of perceptually similar natural categories by 3-month-old and 4-month-old infants. Perception, 22, 463 475.
64. Riddoch, M. Humphreys, G.W. (1987a). A case of integrative visual agnosia. Brain, 110, 1431 1462.
65. Riddoch, M. Humphreys, G.W. (1987b). Visual object processing in optic aphasia - a case of semantic access agnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 4, 131 185.
66. Riddoch, M.J., Humphreys, G.W. Edwards, M.G. (2000). Neuropsychological evidence distinguishing object selection from action (effector) selection. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 547 562.
67. Riddoch, M.J., Humphreys, G.W. Price, C.J. (1989). Routes to action: evidence from apraxia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 6, 437 454.
68. Rizzolatti, G., Camarda, R., Fogassi, L., Gentilucci, M., Luppino, G. Matelli, M. (1988). Functional organization of the inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey: II. Area F5 and the control of distal movements. Experimental Brain Research, 71, 491 507.
69. Rizzolatti, G. Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169 192.
70. Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V. Fogassi, L. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 131 141.
71. Rizzolatti, G. Gallese, V. (1997). From action to meaning: a neurophysiological perspective. In J.-L. Petit (Ed.), Les neurosciences et la philosophie de l'action (pp. 217 229). Paris : Librairie philosophique J. Vrin.
72. Rizzolatti, G. Matelli, M. (2003). Two different streams form the dorsal visual system: anatomy and functions. Experimental Brain Research, 153, 146 157.
73. Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 192 233.
74. Rothi, L.J., Ochipa, C. Heilman, K.M. (1997). A cognitive neuropsychological model of limb praxis and apraxia. In L.J. Rothi K.M. Heilman (Eds.), Apraxia: The neuropsychology of action (pp. 29 49). Hove, UK : Psychology Press.
75. Roy, E.A. Square, P.A. (1985). Common considerations in the study of limb, verbal and oral apraxia. In E.A. Roy (Ed.), Neurospychological studies of apraxia and related disorders (pp. 111 162). Amsterdam : North Holland.
76. Rumiati, R.I. Humphreys, G.W. (1998). Recognition by action: dissociating visual and semantic routes to action in normal observers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 631 647.
77. Saygin, A.P., Wilson, S.M., Dronkers, N.F. Bates, E. (2004). Action comprehension in aphasia: linguistic and non-linguistic deficits and their lesion correlates. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1788 1804.
78. Shapiro, K.A., Moo, L.R. Caramazza, A. (2006). Cortical signatures of noun and verb production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 1644 1649.
79. Striano, T., Rochat, P. Legerstee, M. (2003). The role of modelling and request type on symbolic comprehension of objects and gestures in young children. Journal of Child Language, 30, 27 45.
80. Teixeira Ferreira, C., Giusiano, B., Ceccaldi, M. Poncet, M. (1997). Optic aphasia: evidence of the contribution of different neural systems to object and action naming. Cortex, 33, 499 513.
81. Tranel, D., Kemmerer, D., Adolphs, R., Damasio, H. Damasio, A.R. (2003). Neural correlates of conceptual knowledge for actions. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 409 432.
82. Tranel, D., Martin, C., Damasio, H., Grabowski, T.J. Hichwa, R. (2005). Effects of noun-verb homonymy on the neural correlates of naming concrete entities and actions. Brain and Language, 92, 288 299.
83. Tucker, M. Ellis, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 830 846.
84. Tucker, M. Ellis, R. (2004). Action priming by briefly presented objects. Acta Psychologica, 116, 185 203.
85. Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D.P., Lewis, W. Garrett, M.F. (2004). Representing the meanings of object and action words: the featural and unitary semantic space (FUSS) hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology, 48, 422 488.
86. Waxman, S.R. Namy, L.L. (1997). Challenging the notion of a thematic preference in young children. Developmental Psychology, 33, 555 567.
87. Zwaan, R.A. Taylor, L.J. (2006). Seeing, acting, understanding: motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 1 11.