Semantic priming effects in normal versus poor readers

Journal of Genetic Psychology

Volumn 165, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 67-80

  Assink, Egbert M H ^a   Van Bergen, Floor ^a   Van Teeseling, Heleen ^a   Knuijt, Paul P N A ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Poor readers; Reading ability; Semantic priming

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CHILD; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; READING; SEMANTICS;

ASSOCIATION; CHILD; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; READING; SEMANTICS;

EID: 2042507689     PISSN: 00221325     EISSN: 19400896     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/GNTP.165.1.67-80     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ben-Dror, L., Bentin, S., & Frost, R. (1995). Semantic, phonologic, and morphologic skills in reading disabled and normal children: Evidence from perception and production of spoken Hebrew. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 876-893.
2. Blewitt, P., & Krackow, E. (1992). Acquiring taxonomic relations in lexical memory: The role of superordinate category labels. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 54, 37-56.
3. Bowey, J. A. (1996). Grammatical priming of visual word recognition in fourth-grade children. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 49A, 1005-1023.
4. Brady, S. A., & Shankweiler, D. P. (1991). Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Castles, A., Davis, C., & Letcher, T. (1999). Neighborhood effects on masked form priming in developing readers. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 201-224.
6. Centraal Instituut voor Toetsontwikkeling. (1995). Drie-Minuten Test [Three-Minute Test]. Arnhem, The Netherlands: Author.
7. Chapman, J. J., Chapman, J. P., Curran, T. E., & Miller, M. B. (1994). Do children and the elderly show heightened semantic priming? How to answer the question. Developmental Review, 14, 159-185.
8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the social sciences. (2nd Ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Keppel, G. (1982). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10. Merrill, E. C., Sperber, R. D., & McCauley, C. (1980). The effects of context on word recognition in good and poor readers. The Journal of Psychology, 106, 179-192.
11. Nation, K., Adams, J. W., Bowyer-Crane, C. A., & Snowling, M. J. (1999). Working memory deficits in poor comprehenders reflect underlying language impairments. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 73, 139-158.
12. Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (1998). Semantic processing and the development of wordrecognition skills: Evidence from children with reading comprehension difficulties. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 85-101.
13. Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (1999). Developmental differences in sensitivity to semantic relations among good and poor comprehenders: Evidence from semantic priming. Cognition, 70, b1-b13.
14. Nelson, K. (1988). Where do taxonomic categories come from? Human Development, 31, 3-10.
15. Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In L. C. Ehri, R. Treiman, & P. Gough (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145-174). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Schneider, W. (1988). Micro experimental laboratory user's guide: Computer techniques for real time experimental experimentation. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools, Inc.
18. Simpson, G. B., & Lorsbach, T. C. (1983). The development of automatic and conscious components of contextual facilitation. Child Development, 54, 760-772.
19. Simpson, G. B., Lorsbach, T. C., & Whitehouse, D. (1983). Encoding and contextual components of word recognition in good and poor readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 35(1), 161-171.
20. Sperber, R. D., Davies, D., Merrill, E. C., & McCauley, C. (1982). Cross-category differences in the processing of subordinate-superordinate relationships. Child Development, 53, 1249-1253.
21. Stanovich, K. (1986). Cognitive processes and the reading problems of learning-disabled children: Evaluating the assumption of specificity. In J. K. Torgesen & B. Y. L. Wong (Eds.), Psychological and educational perspectives on learning disabilities (pp. 87-131). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
22. Stijnen, P. J. J. (1978). Woordenschattest bestemd voor leerlingen van de basisschool [Vocabulary test for elementary school children]. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Berkhout.
23. Uitden Boogaart, P. (Ed.). (1975). Woordfrequenties in geschreven en gesproken Nederlands [Word frequencies in written and spoken Dutch]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Oosthoek, Scheltema & Holkema.
24. Van Loon, W. A., & Van Bekkum, I. J. (1991). Woordassociatie lexicon [Word association lexicon]. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
25. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., & Spearing, D. (1995). Semantic and phonological coding in poor and normal readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 59, 76-123.
26. Waxman, S. R., & Namy, L. L. (1997). Challenging the notion of a thematic preference in young children. Developmental Psychology, 33(3), 555-567.