Maternal and paternal condition effects on offspring phenotype in Telostylinus angusticollis (Diptera: Neriidae)

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 2379-2388

  Bonduriansky, R ^a   Head, M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Body size; Condition; Diet; Environmental effects; Maternal effects; Neriidae; Paternal effects; Sexual selection; Telostylinus angusticollis

Indexed keywords

BODY SIZE; DIET; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECT; FECUNDITY; FLY; FOOD PROVISIONING; MATERNAL EFFECT; PATERNAL CARE; PATERNAL EFFECT; PHENOTYPE; SEXUAL SELECTION; SURVIVAL;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; BODY SIZE; CROSS BREEDING; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; FLY; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; LARVA; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; AUSTRALIA; BODY SIZE; CROSSES, GENETIC; DIPTERA; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; LARVA; MALE;

ANIMALIA; DIPTERA; NERIIDAE;

EID: 35448994467     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01419.x     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Agrawal, A.F. 2002. Genetic loads under fitness-dependent mutation rates. J. Evol. Biol. 15 : 1004 1010.
2. Anderson, L.M., Riffle, L., Wilson, R., Travlos, G.S., Lubomirski, M.S. Alvord, W.G. 2006. Preconceptional fasting of fathers alters serum glucose in offspring of mice. Nutrition 22 : 327 331.
3. Anway, M.D. Skinner, M.K. 2006. Epigenetic transgenerational actions of endocrine disruptors. Endocrinology 147 : S43 D49.
4. Anway, M.D., Cupp, A.S., Uzumucu, M. Skinner, M.K. 2005. Epigenetic transgenerational actions of endocrine disruptors and male fertility. Science 308 : 1466 1469.
5. Anway, M.D., Memon, M.A., Uzumcu, M. Skinner, M.K. 2006. Transgenerational effect of the endocrine disruptor Vinclozolin on male spermatogenesis. J. Androl. 27 : 868 879.
6. Blanckenhorn, W.U. 2000. The evolution of body size: what keeps organisms small Q. Rev. Biol. 75 : 385 407.
7. Bonduriansky, R. 2001. The evoluton of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence. Biol. Rev. 76 : 305 339.
8. Bonduriansky, R. 2006. Convergent evolution of sexual shape dimorphism in Diptera. J. Morphol. 267 : 602 611.
9. Bonduriansky, R. 2007. The evolution of condition dependent sexual dimorphism. Am. Nat. 167 : 9 19.
10. Bonduriansky, R., Wheeler, J. Rowe, L. 2005. Ejaculate feeding and female fitness in the sexually dimorphic fly Prochyliza xanthostoma (Diptera: Piophilidae). Anim. Behav. 69 : 489 497.
11. Burley, N. 1986. Sexual selection for aesthetic traits in species with biparental care. Am. Nat. 127 : 415 445.
12. Chang, H.-S., Anway, M.D., Rekow, S.S. Skinner, M.K. 2006. Transgenerational epigenetic imprinting of the male germ-line by endocrine disruptor exposure during gonadal sex determination. Endocrinology 147 : 5524 5541.
13. Cooney, C.A. 2006. Germ cells carry the epigenetic benefits of grandmother's diet. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103 : 17071 17072.
14. vy allele by nutritional supplementation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103 : 17308 17312.
15. Cumming, J.M. 1994. Sexual selection and the evolution of dance fly mating systems (Diptera, Empididae, Empidinae). Can. Entomol. 126 : 907 920.
16. Dussourd, D.E., Ubik, K., Harvis, C., Resch, J., Meinwald, J. Eisner, T. 1988. Biparental defensive endowment of eggs with acquired plant alkaloid in the moth Utetheisa ornatrix. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85 : 5992 5996.
17. Falconer, D.S. Mackay, T.F.C. 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 4th edn. Longman, New York USA.
18. Fitch, K.R., Yasuda, G.K., Owens, K.N. Wakimoto, B.T. 1998. Paternal effects in Drosophila: implications for mechanisms of early development. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 38 : 1 34.
19. Fox, C.W. Czesak, M.E. 2000. Evolutionary ecology of progeny size in arthropods. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 45 : 341 369.
20. García-González, F. Simmons, L.W. 2007. Paternal indirect genetic effects on offspring viability and the benefits of polyandry. Curr. Biol. 17 : 32 36.
21. Gilchrist, G.W. Huey, R.B. 2001. Parental and developmental temperature effects on the thermal dependence of fitness in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 55 : 209 214.
22. Griffith, S.C., Owens, I.P.F. Burke, T. 1999. Environmental determination of a sexually selected trait. Nature 400 : 358 360.
23. Gwynne, D.T. 1988. Courtship feeding in katydids benefits the mating male's offspring. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 23 : 373 377.
24. Holbrook, G. Schal, C. 2004. Maternal investment affects offspring phenotypic plasticity in a viviparous cockroach. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101 : 5595 5597.
25. Huey, R.B., Wakefield, T., Crill, W.D. Gilchrist, G.W. 1995. Within- and between-generation effects of temperature on early fecundity of Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 74 : 216 223.
26. Hunt, J. Simmons, L.W. 2000. Maternal and paternal effects on offspring phenotype in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus. Evolution 54 : 936 941.
27. Hunt, J., Bussiere, L.F., Jennions, M.D. Brooks, R. 2004. What is genetic quality Trends Ecol. Evol. 19 : 329 333.
28. Islam, M.S., Roessingh, P., Simpson, S.J. McCaffery, A.R. 1994. Parental effects on the behaviour and colouration of nymphs of the desert lolcust Schistocerca gregaria. J. Insect Physiol. 40 : 173 181.
29. Ivy, T.M. 2007. Good genes, genetic compatibility and the evolution of polyandry: use of the diallel cross to address competing hypotheses. J. Evol. Biol. 20 : 479 487.
30. Jablonka, E. Lamb, M.J. 1995. Epigenetic Inheritance and Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
31. Jablonka, E. Lamb, M.J. 2005. Evolution in Four Dimensions. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. USA.
32. Kause, A., Ossipov, V., Haukioja, E., Lempa, K., Hanhimaki, S. Ossipova, S. 1999. Multiplicity of biochemical factors determining quality of growing birch leaves. Oecologia 120 : 102 112.
33. Kirkpatrick, M. Ryan, M.J. 1991. The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350 : 33 38.
34. Lande, R. Price, T. 1989. Genetic correlations and maternal effect coefficients obtained from offspring-parent regression. Genetics 122 : 915 922.
35. Lloyd, V. 2000. Parental imprinting in Drosophila. Genetica 109 : 35 44.
36. Magiafoglou, A. Hoffmann, A.A. 2003. Cross-generation effects due to cold exposure in Drosophila serrata. Funct. Ecol. 17 : 664 672.
37. Markow, T.A. 1988. Drosophila males provide a maternal contribution to offspring sired by other males. Funct. Ecol. 2 : 77 79.
38. Markow, T.A. Ankney, P.F. 1984. Drosophila males contribute to oogenesis in a multiple mating species. Science 224 : 302 303.
39. Markow, T.A. Ankney, P.F. 1988. Insemination reaction in Drosophila- found in species whose males contribute material to oocytes before fertilization. Evolution 42 : 1097 1101.
40. Markow, T.A., Gallagher, P.D. Krebs, R.A. 1990. Ejaculate-derived nutritional contribution and female reproductive success in Drosophila mojavensis (Patterson and Crow). Funct. Ecol. 4 : 67 73.
41. Miller, C.W. Moore, A.J. 2007. A potential resolution of the lek paradox through indirect genetic effects. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 274 : 1279 1286.
42. Mousseau, T.A. Dingle, H. 1991. Maternal effects in insect life histories. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 36 : 511 534.
43. Mousseau, T.A. Fox, C.W. 1998. The adaptive significance of maternal effects. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13 : 403 407.
44. Pál, C. Miklós, I. 1999. Epigenetic inheritance, genetic assimilation and speciation. J. Theor. Biol. 200 : 19 37.
45. Pembrey, M.E. 2002. Time to take epigenetic inheritance seriously. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 10 : 669 671.
46. Pembrey, M.E., Bygren, L.O., Kaati, G., Edvinsson, S., Northstone, K., Sjostrom, M., Golding, J. Team, A.S. 2006. Sex-specific, male-line transgenerational responses in humans. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 14 : 159 166.
47. Pitnick, S., Spicer, G.S. Markow, T.A. 1997. Phylogenetic examination of female incorporation of ejaculate in Drosophila. Evolution 51 : 833 845.
48. Qvarnström, A. Price, T.D. 2001. Maternal effects, paternal effects and sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16 : 95 100.
49. Rauter, C.M. Moore, A.J. 2002. Evolutionary importance of parental care performance, food resources, and direct and indirect genetic effects in a burying beetle. J. Evol. Biol. 15 : 407 417.
50. Rossiter, M.C. 1996. Incidence and consequences of inherited environmental effects. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27 : 451 476.
51. Rotem, K., Agrawal, A.A. Kott, L. 2003. Parental effects in Pieris rapae in response to variation in food quality: adaptive plasticity across generations Ecol. Entomol. 28 : 211 218.
52. Savalli, U.M. Fox, C.W. 1999. Effect of male mating history on paternal investment, fecundity, and female remating in the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. Funct. Ecol. 13 : 169 177.
53. Sheldon, B.C. 2000. Differential allocation: tests, mechanisms and implications. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15 : 397 402.
54. Smedley, S.R. Eisner, T. 1996. Sodium: a male moth's gift to its offspring. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93 : 809 813.
55. Uller, T., Eklof, J. Andersson, S. 2005. Female egg investment in relation to male sexual traits and the potential for transgenerational effects in sexual selection. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 57 : 584 590.
56. Vahed, K. 1998. The function of nuptial feeding in insects: a review of empirical studies. Biol. Rev. 73 : 43 78.
57. Van Homrigh, A., Higgie, M., McGuigan, K. Blows, M.W. 2007. The depletion of genetic variance by sexual selection. Curr. Biol. 17 : 528 532.
58. Watson, M.J.O. Hoffmann, A.A. 1995. Cross-generation effects for cold resistance in tropical populations of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Aust. J. Zool. 43 : 51 58.
59. Wedell, N. 1993. Spermatophore size in bushcrickets: comparative evidence for nuptial gifts as a sperm protection device. Evolution 47 : 1203 1212.
60. Wigglesworth, V.B. 1972. The Principles of Insect Physiology, 7th edn. Chapman & Hall, London.
61. Wolf, J.B., Moore, A.J. Brodie, E.D. III. 1997. The evolution of indicator traits for parental quality: the role of maternal and paternal effects. Am. Nat. 150 : 639 649.
62. Wolf, J.B., Brodie, E.D. III. Moore, A.J. 1999. The role of maternal and paternal effects in the evolution of parental quality by sexual selection. J. Evol. Biol. 12 : 1157 1167.
63. Zeh, D.W. Smith, R.L. 1985. Paternal investment by terrestrial arthropods. Am. Zool. 25 : 785 805.