A comparison of nuclear and cytoplasmic genetic effects on sperm competitiveness and female remating in a seed beetle

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 2113-2125

  Dowling, D K ^a,d   Friberg, U ^a,b,c   Arnqvist, G ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Adaptive evolution; Callosobruchus maculatus; Mitochondria; mtDNA; Seed beetles; Sexual selection; Sperm competition

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; BEETLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CYTOPLASM; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; MITOCHONDRION; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; SPERM COMPETITION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BEETLE; CELL NUCLEUS; CROSS BREEDING; CYTOPLASM; FEMALE; GENETICS; MALE; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; SPERMATOZOON;

ANIMALS; BEETLES; CELL NUCLEUS; CROSSES, GENETIC; CYTOPLASM; FEMALE; MALE; SPERMATOZOA;

BRUCHINAE; CALLOSOBRUCHUS MACULATUS; COLEOPTERA;

EID: 35448966244     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01433.x     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Andrés, J.A. Arnqvist, G. 2001. Genetic divergence of the seminal signal-receptor system in houseflies: the footprints of sexually antagonistic coevolution? Proc. R. Soc. B 268 : 399 405.
2. Arnqvist, G. Rowe, L. 2002. Antagonistic coevolution in a group of insects. Nature 415 : 787 789.
3. Arnqvist, G. Rowe, L. 2005. Sexual Conflict. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
4. Arnqvist, G., Nilsson, T. Katvala, M. 2004. Mating rate and fitness in female bean weevils. Behav. Ecol. 16 : 123 127.
5. Baccetti, B., Burrini, A.G., Dallai, R., Giusti, F., Mazzini, M., Renieri, T., Rosati, F. Selmi, G. 1973. Structure and function of the spermatozoon of Tenebrio molitor (The spermatozoon of Arthropoda XX). J. Mechanochem. Cell Motil. 2 : 149 161.
6. Báo, S., Lins, U., Farina, M. De Souza, W. 1992. Mitochondrial derivatives of Culex quinquefasciatus (Culicidae) spermatozoon: some new aspects evidenced by cytochemistry and image processing. J. Ultrastruct. Molec. Struct. Res. 109 : 46 51.
7. Bigliardi, E., Baccetti, B., Burrini, G. Pallini, V. 1970. The spermatozoon of Arthropoda. XII. The distribution of some enzymes in the insect sperm tail. In : Comparative Spermatology (B. Baccetti, ed. pp. 451 464. Academic Press, New York.
8. Birkhead, T.R. Møller, A.P. 1998. Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection. Academic Press, London.
9. Birkhead, T.R., Martinéz, J.G., Burke, T. Froman, D.P. 1999. Sperm mobility determines the outcome of sperm competition in the domestic fowl. Proc. R. Soc. B 266 : 1759 1764.
10. Birkhead, T.R., Pellatt, E.J., Brekke, P., Yeates, R. Castillo-Juarez, H. 2005. Genetic effects on sperm design in the zebra finch. Nature 434 : 383 387.
11. Bjork, A., Starmer, W.T., Higginson, D.M., Rhodes, C.J. Pitnick, S. 2007. Complex interactions with females and rival males limit the evolution of sperm offence and defence. Proc. R. Soc. B. 274 : 1779 1788.
12. Boorman, E. Parker, G.A. 1976. Sperm (ejaculate) competition in Drosophila melanogaster, and the reproductive value of females to males in relation to female age and mating status. Ecol. Entomol. 1 : 145 155.
13. ter Braak, C.J.F. 1987. Permutation versus bootstrap significance tests in multiple regression and ANOVA. Austr. J. Statist. 29 : 91 100.
14. Chippindale, A.K., Gibson, J.R. Rice, W.R. 2001. Negative genetic correlation for adult fitness between sexes reveals ontogenetic conflict in Drosophila. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 98 : 1671 1675.
15. Clark, A.G. 2002. Sperm competition and the maintenance of polymorphism. Heredity 88 : 148 153.
16. Clark, A.G. Begun, D.J. 1998. Genetic variation in female components of sperm displacement. Genetics 149 : 1487 1493.
17. Clark, A.G., Begun, D.J. Prout, T. 1999. Female × male interactions in Drosophila sperm competition. Science 283 : 217 220.
18. Clark, A.G., Dermitzakis, E.T. Civetta, A. 2000. Nontransitivity of sperm competition in Drosophila. Evolution 54 : 1030 1035.
19. Credland, P.F. Wright, A.W. 1989. Factors affecting female fecundity in the cowpea seed beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). J. Stored Prod. Res. 25 : 125 136.
20. Curtsinger, J.W. 1991. Sperm competition and the evolution of multiple mating. Am. Nat. 138 : 93 102.
21. Dewsbury, D.A. 1982. Ejaculate cost and male choice. Am. Nat. 119 : 601 610.
22. Dowling, D.K., Larkeson Nowostawski, A. Arnqvist, G. 2007a. Effects of cytoplasmic genes on sperm viability and sperm morphology in a seed beetle: implications for sperm competition theory J. Evol. Biol. 20 : 358 368.
23. Dowling, D.K., Chávez Abiega, K. Arnqvist, G. 2007b. Temperature-specific outcomes of cytoplasmic-nuclear interactions on egg-to-adult development time in seed beetles. Evolution 61 : 194 201.
24. Ducrocq, V. Humblot, P. 1995. Genetic characteristics and evolution of semen production of young Normande bulls. Livest. Prod. Sci. 41 : 1 10.
25. Eady, P.E. 1991. Sperm competition in Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae): a comparison of two methods used to estimate paternity. Ecol. Entomol. 16 : 45 53.
26. Eady, P.E. 2001. Postcopulatory, prezygotic reproductive isolation. J. Zool. 253 : 47 52.
27. Eady, P.E., Rugman-Jones, P. Brown, D.V. 2004. Prior oviposition, female receptivity and last-male sperm precedence in the cosmopolitan pest Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Anim. Behav. 67 : 559 565.
28. Eberhard, W. 1996. Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
29. Eberhard, W. 2000. Criteria for demonstrating postcopulatory female choice. Evolution 54 : 1047 1050.
30. Edvardsson, M. 2007. Female Callosobruchus maculatus mate when they are thirsty: resource rich ejaculates as mating effort in a beetle. Anim. Behav. 74 : 183 188.
31. Edvardsson, M. Canal, D. 2006. The effects of copulation duration in the bruchid beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. Behav. Ecol. 17 : 430 434.
32. Falconer, D.S. 1989. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman, London.
33. Fisher, R.A. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Dover, New York.
34. Fox, C.W. 1993. Multiple mating, lifetime fecundity and female mortality of the bruchid beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera, Bruchidae). Funct. Ecol. 7 : 203 208.
35. Frank, S.A. Hurst, L.D. 1996. Mitochondria and male disease. Nature 383 : 224.
36. Friberg, U., Lew, T.A., Byrne, P.G. Rice, W.R. 2005. Assessing the potential for an ongoing arms race within and between the sexes: selection and heritable variation. Evolution, 59 : 1540 1551.
37. Fricke, C. Arnqvist, G. 2004. Divergence in replicated phylogenies: the evolution of partial post-mating prezygotic isolation in bean weevils. J. Evol. Biol. 17 : 1345 1354.
38. Froman, D.P., Pizzari, T., Feltmann, A.J., Castillo-Juarez, H. Birkhead, T.R. 2002. Sperm mobility: mechanisms of fertilizing efficiency, genetic variation and phenotypic relationship with male status in the domestic fowl, Gallus gallus domesticus. Proc. R. Soc. B 269 : 607 612.
39. Gage, M.J.G. 1991. Risk of sperm competition directly affects ejaculate size in the Mediterranean fruit fly. Anim. Behav. 42 : 1036 1037.
40. García-González, F. Simmons, L.W. 2005. Sperm viability matters in insect sperm competition. Curr. Biol. 15 : 271 275.
41. Gemmell, N.J. Allendorf, F.W. 2001. Mitochondrial mutations may decrease population viability. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16 : 115 117.
42. Gemmell, N.J., Metcalf, V.J. Allendorf, F.W. 2004. Mother's curse: the effect of mtDNA on individual fitness and population viability. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19 : 238 244.
43. Harvey, P.H. May, R.M. 1989. Copulation dynamics - out for the sperm count. Nature 337 : 508 509.
44. Hirano, T. Miyatake, T. 2007. Interpopulation variation in female remating is attributable to female and male effects in Callosobruchus chinensis. J. Ethol. 25 : 49 55.
45. Hosken, D.J., Garner, T.W.J. Ward, P.I. 2001. Sexual conflict selects for male and female reproductive characters. Curr. Biol. 11 : 489 493.
46. Houle, D. 1992. Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics, 130 : 195 204.
47. Howard, D.J. 1999. Conspecific sperm and pollen precedence and speciation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30 : 109 132.
48. Hughes, K.A. 1997. Quantitative genetics of sperm precedence in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 145 : 139 151.
49. Hunt, J., Bussière, L.F., Jennions, M.D. Brooks, R. 2004. What is genetic quality? Trends Ecol. Evol. 19 : 329 333.
50. Keller, L. Reeve, H.K. 1995. Why do females mate with multiple males? The sexually selected sperm hypothesis. Adv. Stud. Behav. 24 : 291 315.
51. Kenagy, G.J. Trombulak, S.C. 1986. Size and function of mammalian testes in relation to body size. J. Mammal. 67 : 1 22.
52. Mack, P.D., Priest, N.K. Promislow, D.E.L. 2003. Female age and sperm competition: last-male sperm precedence declines as female age increases. Proc. R. Soc. B 270 : 159 165.
53. Manly, B.F.J. 1997. Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall, London.
54. McPeek, M.A. Gavrilets, S. 2006. The evolution of female mating preferences: differentiation from species with promiscuous males can promote speciation. Evolution 60 : 1967 1980.
55. Mitchell, J.A., Nelson, L. Hafez, E. 1976. Motility of spermatozoa. In : Human Semen and Fertility Regulation in Men (E.S.E. Hafez, ed. pp. 83 106. C. V. Mosby, St Louis, MO.
56. Moore, A.J. Pizzari, T. 2005. Quantitative genetic models of sexual conflict based on interacting phenotypes. Am. Nat. 165 : S88 S97.
57. Moore, F.L. Reijo-Pera, R.A. 2000. Male sperm motility dictated by mother's mtDNA. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 67 : 542 548.
58. Moore, A.J., Brodie, E.D. III. Wolf, J.B. 1997. Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process: I. direct and indirect genetic effects of social interactions. Evolution 51 : 1352 1362.
59. Moore, P.J., Harris, W.E., Montrose, V.T., Levin, D. Moore, A. 2004. Constraints on evolution and postcopulatory sexual selection: trade-offs among ejaculate characteristics. Evolution 58 : 1773 1780.
60. Olsson, M., Madsen, T. Shine, R. 1997. Is sperm really so cheap? Costs of reproduction in male adders, Vipera berus. Proc. R. Soc. B 264 : 455 459.
61. Parker, G. 1970. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol. Rev. 45 : 525 567.
62. Perotti, M.E. 1973. The mitochondrial derivative of the spermatozoon of Drosophila before and after fertilization. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 44 : 181 198.
63. Pitnick, S. 1996. Investment in testes and the cost of making long sperm in Drosophila. Am. Nat. 148 : 57 80.
64. Pitnick, S. Markow, T.A. 1994. Large-male advantages associated with costs of sperm production in Drosophila hydei, a species with giant sperm. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 91 : 9277 9281.
65. Pizzari, T. Birkhead, T.R. 2002. The sexually-selected sperm hypothesis: sex-biased inheritance and sexual antagonism. Biol. Rev. 77 : 183 209.
66. Plenderleith, M., van Oosterhout, C., Robinson, R.L. Turner, G.F. 2005. Female preference for conspecific males based on olfactory cues in a Lake Malawi cichlid fish. Biol. Lett. 1 : 411 414.
67. Radwan, J. 1998. Heritability of sperm competition success in the bulb mite, Rhizoglyphus robini. J. Evol. Biol. 11 : 321 327.
68. Rand, D.M., Clark, A.G. Kann, L.M. 2001. Sexually antagonistic cytonuclear fitness interactions in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 159 : 173 187.
69. Rege, J.E.O., Toe, F., Mukasa-Mugerwa, E., Tembely, S., Anindo, D., Baker, R.L. Lahlou-Kassi, A. 2000. Reproductive charateristics of Ethiopian highland sheep II. Genetic parameters of semen characteristics and their relationships with testicular measurements in ram lambs. Small Rumin. Res. 37 : 173 187.
70. Ridley, M. 1988. Mating frequency and fecundity in insects. Biol. Rev. 63 : 509 549.
71. Roff, D.A. 1997. Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics. Chapman & Hall, London.
72. Ruiz-Pesini, E., Lapeña, A.-C., Díez-Sánchez, C., Péres-Martos, A., Montoya, J., Alvarez, E., Díaz, M., Urriés, A., Montoro, L., López- Péres, M.J. Enríquez, J.A. 2000. Human mtDNA haplotypes associated with high or reduced spermatozoa motility. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 67 : 682 696.
73. Savalli, U.M. Fox, C.W. 1999. The effect of male mating history on paternal investment, fecundity and female remating in the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. Funct. Ecol. 13 : 169 177.
74. Sgrò, C.M., Chapman, T. Partridge, L. 1998. Sex-specific selection on time to remate in Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 56 : 1267 1278.
75. Simmons, L.W. 2001. Sperm Competition and its Evolutionary Consequences in the Insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
76. Simmons, L.W. 2003. The evolution of polyandry: patterns of genotypic variation in female mating frequency, male fertilization success and a test of the sexy-sperm hypothesis. J. Evol. Biol. 16 : 624 634.
77. Simmons, L.W. Kotiaho, J.S. 2002. Evolution of ejaculates: patterns of phenotypic and genotypic variation and condition dependence in sperm competition traits. Evolution 56 : 1622 1631.
78. Simmons, L.W. Roberts, B. 2005. Bacterial immunity traded for sperm viability in male crickets. Science 309 : 2031.
79. Sivinski, J. 1980. Sexual selection and insect sperm. Fla. Entomol. 63 : 99 111.
80. Sivinski, J. 1984. Sperm competition. In : Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems (R.L. Smith, ed. pp. 85 115. Academic Press, London.
81. Tilszer, M., Antoszczyk, K., Sałek, N., Zajǎc, E. Radwan, J. 2006. Evolution under relaxed sexual conflict in the bulb mite Rhizoglyphus robini. Evolution 60 : 1868 1873.
82. Tuda, M., Rönn, J., Buranapanichpan, S., Wasano, N. Arnqvist, G. 2006. Evolutionary diversification of the bean beetle genus Callosobruchus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae): traits associated with stored-product pest status. Mol. Ecol. 15 : 3541 3551.
83. Van Vianen, A. Bijlsma, R. 1993. The adult component of selection in Drosophila melanogaster: some aspects of early remating activity in females. Heredity 71 : 269 276.
84. Van Voorhies, W.A. 1992. Production of sperm reduces nematode life-span. Nature 360 : 456 458.
85. Werner, M., Zissler, D. Peschke, K. 1999. Structure and energy pathways of spermatozoa of the rove beetle Aleochara bilineata (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae). Tissue Cell 31 : 413 420.
86. Wilson, N., Tubman, S.C., Eady, P.E. Robertson, G. 1997. Female genotype affects male success in sperm competition. Proc. R. Soc. B 264 : 1491 1495.
87. Yasui, Y. 1997. A 'good-sperm' model can explain the evolution of costly multiple mating by females. Am. Nat. 149 : 573 584.
88. Zeh, J.A. 2004. Sexy sons: a dead end for cytoplasmic genes. Proc. R. Soc. B (Suppl.) 271 : S306 S309.