Manner-of-motion verbs in wine description

Journal of Pragmatics

Volumn 39, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 2095-2114

  Caballero, Rosario ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CASTILLA LA MANCHA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Fictive motion; Genre; Manner of motion verbs; Metonymy; Synesthesia; Winespeak

Indexed keywords

EID: 35448934013     PISSN: 03782166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.07.005     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Amoraritei L. La métaphore en oenologie. Metaphorik.de 3 (2002) 1-12. http://www.metaphorik.de/03/amoraritei.htm Online document. Date of access: May 12th 2006. URL: [www.metaphorik.de/03/amoraritei.htm]
2. Barcelona A. On the plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor. In: Barcelona A. (Ed). Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads (2000), Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin and New York 31-58
3. Bernstein L.S. The Official Guide to Wine Snobbery (1998), Quill, New York
4. Caballero R. Re-Viewing Space. Figurative Language in Architects' Assessment of Built Space (2006), Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin and New York
5. Caballero, Rosario. form is motion. Dynamic predicates in English architectural discourse. In: Panther, Klaus-Uwe, Barcelona, Antonio, Thornburg, Linda (Eds.), Metonymy and Metaphor in Grammar, John Benjamins, Amsterdam and Philadelphia, forthcoming.
6. Chollet S., Valentin D., and Abdi H. Do trained assessors generalize their knowledge to new stimuli?. Food Quality and Preference 16 (2005) 13-23
7. Day, Sean, 1996. Synaesthesia and synaesthetic metaphors. Psyche 2 (32). Online document. Date of access: February 20th 2006. URL: [http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/v2/psyche-2-32-day.html].
8. Dowty D. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar (1979), Reidel, Dordrecht
9. Dowty D. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67 (1991) 547-619
10. Eggins S. An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics (1994), Pinter, London
11. Fillmore C.J. Lexical entries for verbs. Foundations of Language 4 (1968) 373-393
12. Fillmore C.J. Topics in lexical semantics. In: Cole R.W. (Ed). Current Issues in Linguistics Theory (1977), Indiana University Press, Bloomington 76-138
13. Gawel R. The use of language by trained and untrained wine tasters. Journal of Sensory Studies 12 (1997) 267-284
14. Gawel R., and Oberholster A. A Mouth-feel Wheel: Terminology for Communicating the Mouth-feel Characteristics of Red Wine (2001), Department of Horticulture, Viticulture and Oenology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide
15. Gibbs R.W. The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language and Understanding (1994), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York
16. Gluck M. Wine language. Useful idiom or idiot-speak?. In: Aitchison J., and Lewis D.M. (Eds). New Media Language (2003), Routledge, London 107-115
17. Goatly A. The Language of Metaphors (1997), Routledge, London and New York
18. Goldberg A. Semantic principles of predication. In: Koenig J.-P. (Ed). Discourse and Cognition: Bridging the Gap (1998), CSLI Publications, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 41-54
19. Gregutt, Paul, 2003. Scents and nonsense. The Seattle Times Pacific Northwest Magazine. Online document. Date of access: May 12th 2006. URL: [seattletimes.nwsource.com/pacificnw/2003/0112/taste.html].
20. Guerssel, Mohamed, Hale, Kenneth, Laughren, Mary, Levin, Beth, Eagle, Josie, 1985. A cross-linguistic study of transitivity alternations. In: Eilfort, William H., Kroeber, Paul D., Peterson, Karen L. (Eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Causatives and Agentivity, CLS 21(2), Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, IL, pp. 48-63.
21. Halliday M.A.K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (1985/1994), Edward Arnold, London
22. Hughson A., and Boakes R. Perceptual and cognitive aspects of wine tasting expertise. Australian Journal of Psychology 53 (2001) 103-108
23. Ibarretxe-Antuñano I. Motion events in Basque narratives. In: Strömqvist S., and Verhoeven L. (Eds). Relating Events in Narrative: Typological and Contextual Perspectives (2004), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 89-111
24. Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide, 2006. Sound Symbolism and Motion in Basque. LINCOM Studies in Basque Linguistics 06. Lincom, Munich.
25. Jackendoff R. Semantic Structures (1990), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
26. Kaufmann I. What is an (im-)possible verb? Restrictions on semantic form and their consequences for argument structure. Folia Linguistica 24 (1995) 67-103
27. Kita S. Two-dimensional semantic analysis of Japanese mimetics. Linguistics 35 (1997) 379-415
28. Kita S. Japanese enter/exit verbs without motion semantics. Studies in Language 23 (1999) 317-340
29. Lakoff G. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In: Ortony A. (Ed). Metaphor and Thought. second ed. (1993), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York 202-251
30. Lakoff G., and Johnson M. Metaphors We Live by (1980), The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London
31. Lakoff G., and Turner M. More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor (1989), The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London
32. Langacker R. Abstract motion. Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (1986), Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley, CA 455-471 [Reprinted in Langacker, Ronald, 1990. Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin]
33. Langacker R. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. I, Theoretical Prerequisites (1987), Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA
34. Lawless H. Flavour description of white wine by expert and non-expert wine consumers. Journal of Food Science 49 (1984) 120-123
35. Lehrer A. Semantic Structure and Lexical Fields (1974), North-Holland, Amsterdam
36. Lehrer A. Wine and Conversation (1983), Indiana University Press
37. Lehrer A. Wine vocabulary and wine description. Verbatim: The Language Quarterly 18 3 (1992) 13-15
38. Lehrer, Adrienne, 2006. Wine and Conversation: A new look. In: Andor, József, Pelyvas, Péter (Eds.), Empirical, Cognitive-based Studies in the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface, CRISPI, Elsevier Science, Oxford.
39. Levin B. English Verb Classes and its Alternations (1993), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
40. Levin B., and Rappaport Hovav M. The lexical semantics of verbs of motion: the perspective from unaccusativity. In: Roca I. (Ed). Thematic Structure: Its Role in Grammar (1992), Foris, Berlin 247-269
41. Malblanc A. Stylistique Comparée du Français et de l'Allemand (1968), Didier, Paris
42. Martin J.R., Matthiessen C., and Painter C. Working with Functional Grammar (1997), Arnold, London and New York
43. Matclock T. The conceptual motivation of fictive motion. In: Radden G., and Panther K.-U. (Eds). Studies in Linguistic Motivation (2004), Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin and New York 221-248
44. Matsumoto Y. Subjective motion in English and Japanese verbs. Cognitive Linguistics 7 (1996) 183-226
45. Moore, Victoria, 1999. The word on wine: wine description. New Statesman 3, May.
46. Mora Gutiérrez, Juan Pablo, 2001. Directed Motion in English and Spanish. Estudios de Lingüística Española 11. Online document. Date of access: 7th January 2005. URL: [elies.rediris.es/elies11].
47. Morimoto Y. Los Verbos de Movimiento (2001), Visor, Madrid
48. Morrot G., Brochet F., and Dubourdieu D. The color of odors. Brain and Language 79 2 (2001) 309-320
49. Nedlinko A. Viticulture and winemaking terminology and terminography. Terminology 12 1 (2006) 137-164
50. Noble A., Arnold R., Buechsenstein J., Leach J., Schmidt J., and Stern P. Modification of a standardised system of wine aroma terminology. American Journal of Oenology and Viticulture 38 2 (1987) 143-146
51. Özcalişkan S. Typological variation in encoding the manner, path, and ground components of a metaphorical motion event. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 2 (2004) 73-102
52. In: Panther K.-U., and Radden G. (Eds). Metonymy in Language and Thought (1999), John Benjamins, Amsterdam and Philadelphia
53. In: Panther K.-U., and Thornburg L. (Eds). Pragmatic Inferencing in Metonymy (2003), John Benjamins, Amsterdam and Philadelphia
54. Paradis C. Where does metonymy stop? Senses, facets, and active zones. Metaphor and Symbol 19 4 (2004) 245-264
55. Peynaud E. The Taste of Wine (1987), Macdonald Orbis, London
56. Pierre, Brian, 1998. War of the words. Food and Wine Magazine, May.
57. Radden G., and Kövecses Z. Towards a theory of metonymy. In: Panther K.-U., and Radden G. (Eds). Metonymy in Language and Thought (1999), John Benjamins, Amsterdam and Philadelphia 17-59
58. Ramachandran V., and Hubbard E. Synaesthesia-A window into perception, thought and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies 8 12 (2001) 3-34
59. Rappaport Hovav M., and Levin B. Building verb meanings. In: Butt M., and Geuder W. (Eds). The Projection of Arguments: Lexical Compositional Factors (1998), Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford, CA 97-134
60. Ruiz de Mendoza F. The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In: Barcelona A. (Ed). Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads (2000), Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin and New York 109-132
61. Silverstein M. "Cultural" concepts and the language-culture nexus. Current Anthropology 45 5 (2004) 621-652
62. Slobin D. Two ways to travel: verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In: Shibatani M., and Thompson S. (Eds). Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning (1996), Clarendon Press, Oxford 195-219
63. Slobin D. Verbalized events: a dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. In: Niemeier S., and Dirven R. (Eds). Evidence for Linguistic Relativity (2000), Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin 107-138
64. Slobin D. The many ways to search for a frog: linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In: Strömqvist S., and Verhoeven L. (Eds). Relating Events in Narrative: Typological and Contextual Perspectives (2004), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 219-257
65. Solomon G. Psychology of novice and expert wine talk. American Journal of Psychology 105 (1990) 495-517
66. Solomon G. Conceptual change and wine expertise. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 6 (1997) 41-60
67. Talmy L. How language structures space. In: Pick H., and Acredolo L. (Eds). Spatial Orientation: Theory, Research and Application (1983), Plenum Press, New York 225-282
68. Talmy L. Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In: Shopen T. (Ed). Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon vol. III (1985), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 57-149
69. Talmy L. Force dynamics in language and thought. Cognitive Science 12 (1988) 49-100
70. Talmy L. Path to realization: a typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (1991), Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley 480-519
71. Talmy L. Fictive motion in language and "ception". In: Bloom P., Peterson M., Nadel L., and Garrett M. (Eds). Language and Space (1996), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA and London 211-276
72. Talmy, Leonard, 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics, vol. I, Conceptual Structuring Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
73. Tenny C. Aspectual Roles and the Syntax-Semantics Interface (1994), Kluwer, Dordrecht
74. Tesnière L. Elementos de Sintaxis Estructural (1957/1994), Gredos, Madrid
75. Thompson G. Introducing Functional Grammar (1996), Arnold, London and New York
76. Tsur R. On Metaphoring (1987), Israel Science Publishers, Jerusalem
77. Van Valin R.D.J. Semantic parameters of split intransitivity. Language 66 (1990) 221-260
78. Vendler Z. Linguistics in Philosophy (1967), Cornell University Press, Ithaca
79. Vinay J.-P., and Darbelnet J. Stylistique Comparée du Français et de l'Anglais (1958), Didier, Paris
80. Wandruszka M. Nuestros Idiomas, Comparables e Incomparables (1976), Gredos, Madrid
81. Yu N. Synesthetic metaphor: a cognitive perspective. Journal of Literary Semantics 32 (2003) 19-34