Conceptual Change and Wine Expertise

Journal of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 41-60

  Solomon, Gregg E A ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031542204     PISSN: 10508406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327809jls0601_3     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Amerine, M. A., & Roessler, E. B. (1983). Wines: Their sensory evaluation. New York: Freeman.
2. Atran, S. (1994). Core domains versus scientific theories: Evidence from systematics and Itzaj-Maya folkbiology. In L. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain-specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 316-340). New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. Berlin, B. (1978). Ethnobiological classification. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 9-26). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
4. Berlin, B. (1981). Speculation on the growth of ethnobiological nomenclature. Language in Society, 1, 51-86.
5. Biederman, I., & Shiffrar, M. M. (1987). Sexing day-old chicks: A case study and expert systems analysis of a difficult perceptual-learning task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 640-645.
6. Brown, R. W. (1958). How shall a thing be called? Psychological Review, 65, 14-21.
7. Carey, S. (1988). Conceptual differences between adults and children. Mind and Language, 3, 167-181.
8. Carey, S. (1991). Knowledge acquisition: Enrichment or conceptual change? In S. Carey & R. Gelman (Eds.), The epigenesis of mind: Essays on biology and cognition (pp. 257-292). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
9. Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55-81.
10. Chastrette, M., Elmouaffek, A., & Sauvegrain, P. (1988). A multidimensional statistical study of similarities between 74 notes used in perfumery. Chemical Senses, 13, 295-305.
11. Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152.
12. Chi, M. T. H., Hutchinson, J. E., & Robin, A. F. (1989). How inferences about normal domain-related concepts can be constrained by structured knowledge. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 35, 27-62.
13. Chi, M. T. H., & Koeske, R. (1983). Network representation of a child's dinosaur knowledge. Developmental Psychology, 19, 29-39.
14. de Groot, A. (1965). Thought and choice in chess. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
15. Dougherty, J. W. D. (1978). Salience and relativity in classification. American Ethnologist, 5, 66-80.
16. Fleiss, J. A. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: Wiley.
17. Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Gallistel, C. R., Brown, A. L., Carey, S., Gelman, R., & Keil, F. C. (1991). In S. Carey & R. Gelman (Eds.), The epigenesis of mind: Essays on biology and cognition (pp. 3-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
19. Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
20. Gibson, J. J., & Gibson, E. J. (1955). Perceptual learning: Differentiation or enrichment. Psychological Review, 62, 32-41.
21. Gobbo, C., & Chi, M. T. H. (1986). How knowledge is structured and used by expert and novice children. Cognitive Development, 1, 221-237.
22. Howell, D. C. (1982). Statistical methods for psychology. Boston: Duxbury.
23. Keil, F. C. (1989). Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
24. Kitcher, P. (1988). The child as parent of the scientist. Mind and Language, 3, 217-228.
25. Krumhansl, C. L. (1979). The psychological representation of musical pitch in atonal context. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 346-374.
26. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. Kuhn, T. S. (1977). The essential tension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28. Kuhn, T. S. (1983). Commensurability, comparability, and communicability. In P. Asquith & T. Nickles (Eds.), PSA 1982 (pp. 669-688). East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.
29. Lakoff, G. (1986). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories tel! about the nature of thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30. Lawless, H. T. (1984). Flavor description of white wine by expert and nonexpert wine consumers. Journal of Food Science, 49, 120-123.
31. Lawless, H. T. (1988). Odour description and odour classification revisited. In D. M. M. Thomson (Ed.), Food and acceptability (pp. 27-40). London: Elsevier.
32. Lawless, H. T. (1989). Exploration of fragrance categories and ambiguous odors using multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis. Chemical Senses, 14, 349-360.
33. Lehrer, A. (1975). Talking about wine. Language, 51, 901-923.
34. Lehrer, A. (1983). Wine and conversation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
35. Leslie, A. M. (1988). The necessity of illusion: Perception and thought in infancy. In L. Weiskrantz (Ed.), Thought without language (pp. 185-210). Oxford, England: Oxford Science Publications.
36. Lunn, J. H. (1948). Chick sexing. American Scientist, 36, 280-287.
37. Malt, B. C., & Smith, E. E. (1984). Correlated properties in natural categories. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 250-269.
38. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco: Freeman.
39. Medin, D. L., Wattenmaker, W. D., & Hampson, S. E. (1987). Family resemblance, conceptual cohesiveness, and category construction. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 242-279.
40. Nersessian, N. J. (1992). How do scientists think? Capturing the dynamics of conceptual change in science. In R. N. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science: Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (Vol. 15, pp. 3-44). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
41. Noble, A. C., Arnold, R. A., Buechsenstein, J., Leach, E. J., Schmidt, J. O., & Stern, P. M. (1987). Modification of a standardized system of wine aroma terminology. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 38, 143-146.
42. Robinson, J. (1986). Vines, grapes, and wines. New York: Knopf.
43. Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblance: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573-605.
44. Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382-439.
45. Solomon, G. E. A. (1990). The psychology of novice and expert wine talk. American Journal of Psychology, 103, 495-517.
46. Solomon, G. E. A., Johnson, S. C., Zaitchik, D., & Carey, S. (1996). Like father, like son: Young children's understanding of biological inheritance. Child Development, 67, 151-171.
47. Tanaka, J. W., & Taylor, M. (1991). Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? Cognitive Psychology, 23, 457-482.