Effects of eugenol and noneugenol endodontic sealer cements on post retention

Journal of Endodontics

Volumn 24, Issue 8, 1998, Pages 564-567

  Schwartz, Richard S ^a   Murchison, David F ^b   Walker III, William A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^b General Dentistry Residency ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AH 26 FILLING MATERIAL; BISMUTH; EPOXY RESIN; EUGENOL; FLECKS; GUTTA PERCHA; METHENAMINE; PANAVIA TPN S; PANAVIA TPN-S; PHOSPHATE; RESIN CEMENT; ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIAL; ROTH'S 801 SEALER; SILVER; TITANIUM; TOOTH CEMENT; ZINC OXIDE EUGENOL; ZINC PHOSPHATE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DRUG COMBINATION; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BISMUTH; CEMENTATION; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DRUG COMBINATIONS; EPOXY RESINS; EUGENOL; GUTTA-PERCHA; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; METHENAMINE; PHOSPHATES; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; RESIN CEMENTS; ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIALS; SILVER; TITANIUM; ZINC OXIDE-EUGENOL CEMENT; ZINC PHOSPHATE CEMENT;

EID: 0032134066     PISSN: 00992399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80079-4     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Robbins JW. Guidelines for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 1990;120:558-64.
2. Standlee JP, Caputo M, Hanson EC. Retention of endodontic dowels: effects on cement, dowel length, diameter, design. J Prosthet Dent 1978;39:401-5.
3. Standlee JP, Caputo AA. Endodontic dowel retention with resinous cements. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:913-7.
4. Sorenson JA, Martinoff JT. Clinically significant factors in dowel design. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:28-35.
5. Cooney JP, Caputo AA, Trabert KC. Retention and stress distribution by endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:540-6.
6. Goldman M, DeVitre R, Pier M. Effect of the dentin smeared layer on tensile strength of cemented posts. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:485-8.
7. Chan FW, Harcourt JK, Brockhurst PJ. The effect of post adaptation in the root canal on retention of posts cemented with various cements. Austral Dent J 1993;38:39-45.
8. Chapman KW, Worley JL, von Fraunhofer JA. The effect of bonding agents on retention of posts. Gen Dent 1985;33:128-30.
9. Tjan AHL, Nemetz H. Effect of eugenol-containing endodontic sealer on retention of prefabricated posts luted with an adhesive composite resin cement. Quint Int 1992;839-44.
10. Liberman R, Ben-Amar A, Urstein M, Gontar G, Fitzig S. Conditioning of root canals prior to dowel cementation with composite luting cement and two dentine adhesive systems. J Oral Rehab 1989;16:597-602.
11. Ben-Amar A, Gontar G, Fitzig S, Urstein M, Liberman R. Retention of prefabricated posts with dental adhesive and composite. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:684.
12. Nathanson D, Dias KR, Ashayeri N. The significance of retention in post and core restorations. Pract Periodont Aesthet Dent 1993;5:82-90.
13. Craig RG. Restorative dental materials. 7th ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby Co., 1985:237.
14. Mendoza DB, Eakle WS. Retention of posts cemented with various dentinal bonding cements. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:591-4.
15. Paschal JE Jr., Burgess JO. Tensile load to remove posts cemented with different cements [Abstract 1362]. J Dent Res (Special Issue) 1995;74:182.
16. Paschal JE Jr., Burgess JO, Robbins JW. Post retention with and without root canal fillers [Abstract 3190]. J Dent Res (Special Issue) 1997;76:412.
17. Burgess JO, Re GJ, Nunez A. Effect of sealer type on post retention [Abstract 1356]. J Dent Res (Special Issue) 1997;76:183.
18. El-Mowafy OM, Aflazi D. Retention of titanium posts cemented with a dentin bonded resin cement [Abstract 299]. J Dent Res (Special Issue) 1996;75:55.
19. Schwartz RS, Davis RD, Hilton TJ. Effect of temporary cements on the bond strength of a resin cement. Am J Dent 1992;5:147-50.