Anosmics are more poorly able to taste than normal persons;Anosmiker schmecken schlechter als gesunde

Laryngo- Rhino- Otologie

Volumn 86, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 640-643

  Gudziol, Hilmar ^a,c   Rahneberg, K ^a   Burkert, S ^b  

^a JENA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Germany)

^b MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

^c FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

Author keywords

Anosmia; Smell taste interaction; Taste

Indexed keywords

ANOSMIA; ARTICLE; BITTER TASTE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; COPING BEHAVIOR; GENDER; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RECOGNITION; SENSIBILITY; SWEETNESS; TASTE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OLFACTION DISORDERS; SEX FACTORS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TASTE DISORDERS; TASTE THRESHOLD;

EID: 35348953724     PISSN: 09358943     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-966228     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. de Araujo IE, Rolls ET, Kringelbach ML, McGlone F, Phillips N. Taste-olfactory convergence, and the representation of the pleasantness of flavour, in the human brain. Eur J Neurosci 2003; 18: 2059-2068
2. Dalton P, Doolittle N, Nagata H, Breslin PA. The merging of the senses: integration of subthreshold taste and smell. Nat Neurosci 2000; 3: 431-432
3. Small DA. Crossmodal integration - insights from the chemical senses. Trends Neurosci 2004; 27: 120-123; discussion 123-124
4. Deems DA, Doty RL, Settle RG et al. Smell and taste disorders, a study of 750 patients from the University of Pennsylvania Smell and Taste Center. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991; 117: 519-528
5. Rahneberg K. Subjektive Untersuchungen der gustatorischen und olfaktorischen Sensibilität bei Patienten mit Ageusie, Anosmie und Normalprobanden. Jena: Mediz. Fakultät, Friedrich Schiller Universität, 2004: 96
6. Hummel T, Nesztler C, Kollert S et al. Gustatory sensitivity in patients with anosmia. Chem Senses 2001; 26: 1118
7. Kobal G, Klimek L, Wolfensberger M et al. Multicenter investigation of 1036 subjects using a standardized method for the assessment of olfactory function combining tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2000; 257: 205-211
8. Rolls ET, Baylis LL. Gustatory, olfactory, and visual convergence within the primate orbitofrontal cortex. J Neurosci 1994; 14: 5437-5452
9. Murphy C, Cain WS, Bartoshuk LM. Mutual action of taste and olfaction. Sens Processes 1977; 1: 204-211
10. Pfeiffer JC, Hollowood TA, Hort J, Taylor AJ. Temporal synchrony and integration of sub-threshold taste and smell signals. Chem Senses 2005; 30: 539-545
11. Kapp BS, Whalen PJ, Supple WF, Pascoe JP. The Amygdala: Neurobiological Aspects of Emotion, Memory and Mental Dysfunction. New York: Wiley-Liss, 1992: 229-254
12. Small DM, Jones-Gorman M, Zatorre RJ, Petrides M, Evans AC. Flavor processing: more than the sum of its parts. Neuroreport 1997; 8: 3913-3917
13. Rolls ET, Scott TR. Central Taste Anatomy and Neurophysiology. New York, Basel: Marcel Dekker, Inc, 2003: 679-706
14. Bartoshuk LM, Rifkin B, Marks LE, Bars P. Taste and aging. Journal of gerontology 1986; 41: 51-57
15. Stevens JC, Cain WS. Changes in taste and flavor in aging. Critical reviews in food science and nutrition 1993; 33: 27-37
16. Schiffman SS. Taste and smell losses in normal aging and disease. Jama 1997; 278: 1357-1362
17. Kobal G, Hummel C. Cerebral chemosensory evoked potentials elicited by chemical stimulation of the human olfactory and respiratory nasal mucosa. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1988; 71: 241-250
18. Livermore A, Hummel T, Pauli E, Kobal G. Perception of olfactory and intranasal trigeminal stimuli following cutaneous electrical stimulation. Experientia 1993; 49: 840-842
19. Cain WS, Murphy CL. Interaction between chemoreceptive modalities of odour and irritation. Nature 1980; 284: 255-257
20. Gudziol H, Schubert M, Hummel T. Decreased trigeminal sensitivity in anosmia. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2001; 63: 72-75
21. Feldmann H. Das Gutachten des Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Arztes, 5. Auflage. Stuttgart: Thieme, 2001: 333