Iterative tandem catalysis of secondary diols and diesters to chiral polyesters

Chemistry - A European Journal

Volumn 13, Issue 29, 2007, Pages 8325-8332

  Van As, Bart A C ^a   Van Buijtenen, Jeroen ^a   Mes, Tristan ^a   Palmans, Anja R A ^a   Meijer, E W ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Enzyme catalysis; Kinetic resolution; Polymerization; Racemization; Ruthenium

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOLS; CATALYSIS; ENZYMES; FUNCTIONAL GROUPS; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; POLYESTERS; POLYMERIZATION; POLYMERS; RUTHENIUM;

ENZYME CATALYSIS; KINETIC RESOLUTION; RACEMIZATION;

CHIRALITY;

EID: 35348942312     PISSN: 09476539     EISSN: 15213765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/chem.200700818     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. J. C. Wasilke, S. J. Obrey, R. T. Baker, G. C. Bazan, Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 1001-1020.
2. D.E. Fogg, E.N. dos Santos, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2004, 248, 2365-2379.
3. A. Bruggink, R. Schoevaart, T. Kieboom, Org. Process Res. Dev. 2003. 7, 622-640.
4. S. F. Mayer, W. Kroutil, K. Faber, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2001, 30, 332-339.
5. a) L. F. Tietze, Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 115-136;
6. b) L. F. Tietze, N. Rackelmann, Pure Appl. Chem. 2004, 76, 1967-1983.
7. a) B. Martín-Matute, M. Edin, K. Bogar, J.-E. Bäckvall, Angew. Chem. 2004, 116, 6697-6701;
8. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 6535-6539;
9. b) O. Pamiès, J.-E. Bäckvall, Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 3247-3261;
10. c) O. Pamiès, J.-E. Bäckvall. Trends Biotechnol. 2004, 22, 130-135:
11. d) J. H. Choi, Y. K. Choi, Y. H. Kim, E. S. Park, E. J. Kim, M. J. Kim, J. W. Park, J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 1972-1977;
12. e) D. Lee, E. A. Huh, M.-J. Kim, H. M. Jung, J. H. Koh, J. Park, Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 2377-2379:
13. f) J. H. Koh, H. M. Jung, M.-J. Kim, J. Park, Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 6281-6284:
14. g) G. K. M. Verzijl, J. G. De Vries, Q. B. Broxterman, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2005, 16, 1603-1610.
15. a) M. T. Reetz, K. Schimossek, Chimia 1996, 50, 668-669;
16. b)M.J. Kim, W. H. Kim, K. Han, Y. K. Choi, J. W. Park, Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1157-1159;
17. c) S. Gastaldi, S. Escoubet. N. Vanthuyne, G. Gil, M. P. Bertrand, Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 837-839;
18. d) M. Stirling, J. Blacker, M. I. Page, Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 1247-1250;
19. e) J. Paetzold, J.-E. Bäckvall, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 17620-17621;
20. f) O. Pàmies, A. H. Ell, J. S. M Samec, N. Hermanns, J.-E. Bäckvall, Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 4699-4702.
21. a) B. A. C van As, J. van Buijtenen, A. Heise, Q. B. Broxterman, G. K. M. Verzijl, A. R. A. Palmans. E. W. Meijer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9964-9965;
22. b) J. van Buijtenen, B. A. C. van As, J. Meuldijk. A. R. A. Palmans, J. Vekemans, L. A. Hulshof, E. W. Meijer. Chem. Commun. 2006, 3169-3171.
23. I. Hilker, G. Rabani, G. K. M. Verzijl, A. R. A. Palmans, A. Heise, Angew. Chem. 2006, 118, 2184-2186;
24. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 2130-2132.
25. A. O. Magnusson, M. Takwa, A. Hamburg, K. Huit, Angew. Chem. 2005, 117, 4658-4661;
26. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4582-4585.
27. The rate of racemization (which equals the rate of production of R-secondary alcohols if racemization is rate-limiting) is assumed to be first order in the concentration of the S alcohol. If indeed racemization is rate-limiting and all alcohols groups are in the S configuration, (and assuming that the changing polarity of the system plays no significant role) the total rate of reaction (which equals the production of 7?-secondary alcohols) will be first order in concentration of the S alcohol. Therefore, once the 50% conversion threshold has been crossed, a linear relationship should hold between -ln(1 - conversion) and time and a pseudo first order rate constant can be calculated.
28. J. H. Choi, N. Kim, Y. J. Shin, J. H. Park, J. Park, Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 4607-4610.
29. C. Orrenius, F. Haeffner, D. Rotticci, N. Ohrner, T. Norin, K. Huit, Biocatal. Biotransform. 1998, 16, 1-15.
30. The two experiments with 2 mol% Ru are at different DMP concentration and, therefore, display different reaction rates
31. The kinetics of racemization are assumed to be first order in alcohol concentration.
32. C. P. Casey, S. W. Singer, D. R. Powell, R. K. Hayashi, M. Kavana, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123,1090-1100.
33. The two experiments with 0.5 M DMP are at different catalyst loadings and, therefore, display different reaction rates.
34. J. S. Wallace, B. W. Baldwin, C. J. Morrow, J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 5231-5239.