Removal of suspended particles from extract of tuna spleen by microfiltration: Experimental evaluation of a low fouling condition

Journal of Food Engineering

Volumn 85, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 309-315

  Li, Zhen Yu ^a   Youravong, Wirote ^a   H Kittikun, Aran ^a  

^a PRINCE OF SONGKLA UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Batch concentration; Microfiltration; Modeling; Proteases; Suspended particles; Tuna spleen

Indexed keywords

COLOR; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARTICLES (PARTICULATE MATTER); PROTEINS; SHEAR STRESS;

BATCH CONCENTRATION; CHYMOTRYPSIN; PROTEASES; SUSPENDED PARTICLES; TUNA SPLEEN;

MICROFILTRATION;

SCOMBRIDAE; THUNNUS ALBACARES;

EID: 35348911339     PISSN: 02608774     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.07.004     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bowen W.R., and Gan Q. Properties of microfiltration membrane: The effects of adsorption and shear on the recovery of an enzyme. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 40 (1992) 491-497
2. 2 suspensions. Journal of Membrane Science 254 (2005) 295-301
3. Constenla D.T., and Lozano J.E. Hollow fibre ultrafiltration of apple juice macroscopic approach. Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft und Technologie 30 4 (1997) 373-378
4. Espinasse B., Bacchin P., and Aimar P. On an experimental method to measure critical flux in ultrafiltration. Desalination 146 (2002) 91-96
5. Geasan-Guiziou G., Boyaval E., and Daufin G. Critical stability conditions in crossflow microfiltration of skimmed milk: Transition to irreversible deposition. Journal of Membrane Science 158 (1999) 211-222
6. Howell J.A. Sub-critical flux operation of microfiltration. Journal of Membrane Science 107 (1995) 165-171
7. Howell J.A., Chua H.C., and Arnot T.C. In situ manipulation of critical flux in a submerged membrane bioreactor using variable aeration rates and effects of membrane history. Journal of Membrane Science 242 (2004) 13-19
8. Jeantet R., Rodriguez J., and Garem A. Nanofiltration of sweet whey by spiral wound organic membranes: Impact of hydrodynamics. Le Lait 80 (2000) 155-163
9. Le Berre O., and Daufin G. Skim milk crossflow microfiltration performance versus permeation flux to wall shear stress ratio. Journal of Membrane Science 117 (1999) 261-270
10. Li Q.Y., Cui Z.F., and Pepper D.S. Fractionation of HSA and IgG by gas sparged ultrafiltration. Journal of Membrane Science 136 (1997) 181-190
11. Lu W.M., Hwang K.J., and Ju S.C. Studies on the mechanism of crossflow filtration. Chemical Engineering Science 48 5 (1993) 863-872
12. Meireles M., Aimar P., and Sanchez V. Albumin denaturation during ultrafiltration: Effects of operating conditions and consequences on membrane fouling. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 38 (1991) 528-534
13. Metsamuuronen S., Howell J., and Nystrom M. Critical flux in ultrafiltration of myoglobin and baker's yeast. Journal of Membrane Science 196 (2002) 13-25
14. National Food Institute, (2005). Available from: .
15. Prasertsan P., Wuttjumnong P., Sophanodora P., and Choorit W. Seafood processing industries within Songkhla-Hat Yai region: The survey of basic data emphasis on waste. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology 10 (1988) 447-451
16. Tracey E.M., and Davis R.H. Protein fouling of track-etched polycarbonate microfiltration membrane. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 167 (1994) 104-116
17. Vadi P.K., and Rizvi S.S.H. Experimental evaluation of a uniform transmembrane pressure crossflow microfiltration unit for the concentration of micellar casein from skim milk. Journal of Membrane Science 189 (2001) 69-82
18. Velasco C., Ouammou M., Calvo J.I., and Hernandez A. Protein fouling in microfiltration: Deposition mechanism as a function of pressure for different pH. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 266 (2003) 148-152
19. Zhenyu L., Youravong W., and H-Kittikun A. Separation of proteases from yellowfin tuna spleen by ultrafiltration. Bioresource Technology 97 (2006) 2364-2370