Federalism and market-based education policy: The supplemental educational services mandate

American Journal of Education

Volumn 113, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 311-339

  Vergari, Sandra ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35348853997     PISSN: 01956744     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/510169     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) and the American Institute for Social Justice (AISJ). 2004. "Accountability Left Behind: While Children and Schools Face High Stakes Testing, Tutoring Companies Get a Free Ride." Policy report, ACORN and AISJ, Washington, DC.
2. Belfield, Clive R., and Chad d'Entremont. 2005. "Will Disadvantaged Students Benefit from a Free Market in Supplemental Education Services?" American School Board Journal 192 (5): 28-31.
3. Bell, Courtney. 2005. "All Choices Created Equal? How Good Parents Select 'Failing' Schools." Working Paper (October), National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education, New York.
4. Betts, Julian R., and Anne Danenberg. 2004. "San Diego: Do Too Many Cooks Spoil the Broth?" In Leaving No Child Behind? Options for Kids in Failing Schools, ed. Frederick M. Hess and Chester E. Finn Jr. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
5. Briffault, Richard. 2005. "The Local School District in American Law." In Besieged: School Boards and the Future of Education Politics, ed. William G. Howell. Washington, DC: Brookings.
6. Casserly, Michael. 2004. "Choice and Supplemental Services in America's Great City Schools." In Leaving No Child Behind? Options for Kids in Failing Schools, ed. Frederick M. Hess and Chester E. Finn Jr. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
7. Center on Education Policy. 2005. From the Capitol to the Classroom: Tear 3 of the No Child Left Behind Act. Policy report. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.
8. Chubb, John E., and Terry M. Moe. 1990. Politics, Markets, and America's Schools. Washington, DC: Brookings.
9. Citizens' Commission on Civil Rights. 2004. Choosing Better Schools: A Report on Student Transfers under the No Child Left Behind Act. Policy report. Washington, DC: Citizens' Commission on Civil Rights.
10. Cohen, Jeffrey H. 2005. '"Supplemental Services': A Provider Responds." Letter to the Editor. Education Week 24 (19): 35.
11. Conley, David T 2003. Who Governs Our Schools? Changing Roles and Responsibilities. New York: Teachers College Press.
12. Corcoran, Thomas, and Margaret Goertz. 2005. "The Governance of Public Education." In The Public Schools, ed. Susan Fuhrman and Marvin Lazerson. New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Cross, Christopher. 2004. Political Education: National Policy Comes of Age. New York: Teachers College Press.
14. Eaton, Susan. 2004. "Outsourcing the Tutor's Job." Commentary. Education Week 24 (15): 29-31.
15. Education Commission of the States. 2004. ECS Report to the Nation: State Implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act. Policy report. Denver: Education Commission of the States.
16. Education Industry Association. 2005. "SES Providers' Perspective on Evaluation." January 24, http://www.educationindustry.org/documents/ EIA_SES_Eval_1-25-05.pdf.
17. Finn, Chester E., Jr., and Frederick M. Hess. 2004. "On Leaving No Child Behind." Public Interest 157:35-56.
18. Fuhrman, Susan H. 2004. "Less Than Meets the Eye: Standards, Testing, and Fear of Federal Control." In Who's in Charge Here? The Tangled Web of School Governance and Policy, ed. Noel Epstein. Washington, DC: Brookings.
19. Gewertz, Catherine. 2005a. "Critics Question Use of Offshore Firms for Online Tutoring." Education Week 24 (32): 14.
20. Gewertz, Catherine. 2005b. "Ed Dept. Grants N.Y.C., Boston Waivers on NCLB Tutoring." Education Week 25 (12): 13.
21. Gewertz, Catherine. 2005c. "Tutoring Comes under Review in Congress: House Holds Hearings on Services Provision of No Child Left Behind." Education Week 24 (34): 32.
22. Godwin, Kenneth, and Wenda Sheard. 2001. "Education Reform and the Politics of 2000." Publius: The Journal of Federalism 31 (3): 111-29.
23. Goertz, Margaret E. 2005. "Implementing the No Child Left Behind Act: Challenges for the States." Peabody Journal of Education 80 (2): 73-89.
24. Gorman, Siobhan. 2004a. "The Invisible Hand of NCLB." In Leaving No Child Behind? Options for Kids in Failing Schools, ed. Frederick M. Hess and Chester E. Finn Jr. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
25. Gorman, Siobhan. 2004b. "Selling Supplemental Services." Education Next 4 (4): 31-36.
26. Henig, Jeffrey R. 1994. Rethinking School Choice: Limits of the Market Metaphor. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27. Hess, Frederick M. 2003. "What Is 'Public' about Public Education?" Education Week 22 (16): 32, 56.
28. Hess, Frederick M., and Chester E. Finn Jr. 2004a. "Conclusion. " In Leaving No Child Behind? Options for Kids in Failing Schools, ed. Frederick M. Hess and Chester E. Finn Jr. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
29. Hess, Frederick M., and Chester E. Finn Jr., eds. 2004b. Leaving No Child Behind? Options for Kids in Failing Schools. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
30. Hill, Paul T 2001. "What Is Public about Public Education?" In A Primer on America's Schools, ed. Terry M. Moe. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
31. Hill, Paul T., Lawrence C. Pierce, and James W Guthrie. 1997. Reinventing Public Education: How Contracting Can Transform America's Schools. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32. Howell, William. 2004a. "Fumbling for the Exit Key: Parents, Choice, and the Future of NCLB." In Leaving No Child Behind? Options for Kids in Failing Schools, ed. Frederick M. Hess and Chester E. Finn Jr. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
33. Howell, William. 2004b. "Worcester: Thunderous Clouds, No Rain." In Leaving No Child Behind? Options for Kids in Failing Schools, ed. Frederick M. Hess and Chester E. Finn Jr. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
34. Illinois State Board of Education. 2005. "ISBE and Newton Learning Reach Agreement on SES Services." Press release, Illinois State Board of Education, November 29.
35. Kingdon, John W 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. 2nd ed. New York: HarperCollins.
36. Larabee, David F. 1997. "Public Goods, Private Goods: The American Struggle over Educational Goals." American Educational Research Journal 34 (1): 39-81.
37. Levin, Henry M. 2004. "Multiple 'Choice' Questions: The Road Ahead." In Who's in Charge Here? The Tangled Web of School Governance and Policy, ed. Noel Epstein. Washington, DC: Brookings.
38. Maranto, Robert, and April Gresham Maranto. 2004. "Options for Low-Income Students: Evidence from the States." In Leaving No Child Behind? Options fir Kids in Failing Schools, ed. Frederick M. Hess and Chester E. Finn Jr. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
39. Maxwell, Lesli A. 2006. "Tutoring Providers Claim Districts a Barrier." Education Week 25 (24): 5, 18.
40. Mazmanian, Daniel A., and Paul A. Sabatier. 1983. Implementation and Public Policy. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
41. McDonnell, Lorraine M. 2005. "No Child Left Behind and the Federal Role in Education: Evolution or Revolution?" Peabody Journal of Education 80 (2): 19-38.
42. McGuinn, Patrick. 2005. "The National Schoolmarm: No Child Left Behind and the New Educational Federalism." Publius: The Journal of Federalism 35 (1): 41-68.
43. McLaughlin, Milbrey Wallin. 1987. "Learning from Experience: Lessons from Policy Implementation." Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 9 (2): 171-78.
44. Medler, Alex. 2004. "Colorado: Layered Reforms and Challenges of Scale." In Leaving No Child Behind? Options for Kids in Failing Schools, ed. Frederick M. Hess and Chester E. Finn Jr. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
45. Mintrom, Michael, and Sandra Vergari. 1997. "Education Reform and Accountability Issues in an Intergovernmental Context." Publius: The Journal of Federalism 27 (Spring): 143-66.
46. New Democrats. 2001. Letter from House and Senate New Democrats to President Bush on Education Reform. February 26, http://www.dlc.org/ndol_ci.cfm? kaid = 110&subid = 134&contentid = 3083.
47. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. 2002. Public Law 107-10.
48. O'Toole, Laurence J., Jr. 2000. "American Intergovernmental Relations: Concluding Thoughts." In American Intergovernmental Relations, 3rd ed., ed. Laurence J. O'Toole Jr. Washington, DC: CQ, Press.
49. Peterson, Paul. 2005. "Making Up the Rules as You Play the Game: A Conflict of Interest at the Very Heart of NCLB." Education Next 5 (4): 43-48.
50. Pines, Steven. 2005. Memo from Steven Pines, Executive Director of the Education Industry Association, to State Directors of Supplemental Education Services. September 30, http://www.educationindustry.org/documents/ MemoStateSESDirectors_0930052 .pdf.
51. Plank, David N., and Christopher Dunbar Jr. 2004. "Michigan: False Start." In Leaving No Child Behind? Options for Kids in Failing Schools, ed. Frederick M. Hess and Chester E. Finn Jr. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
52. Ravitch, Diane, and Joseph P Viterriti, eds. 1997. New Schools for a New Century: The Redesign of Urban Education. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
53. Reid, Karla Scoon. 2004. "Federal Law Spurs Private Companies to Market Tutoring." Education Week 24 (15): 1, 18-19.
54. Reijniers, J. J. A. M. 1994. "Organization of Public-Private Partnership Projects." International Journal of Project Management 12:137-42.
55. Richard, Alan. 2005. "Supplemental Help Can Be Hard to Find for Rural Students." Education Week 25 (14): 1, 22.
56. Rosenau, Pauline Vaillancourt. 2000. "The Strengths and Weaknesses of Public-Private Partnerships." In Public-Private Policy Partnerships, ed. Pauline Vaillancourt Rosenau. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
57. Ross, Steven M., and Supplemental Educational Services Quality Center. 2005. "Evaluating Supplemental Educational Service Providers: Suggested Strategies for States." Issue brief, Supplemental Educational Services Quality Center, Washington, DC, March.
58. Ryan, James E. 2004. "The Tenth Amendment and Other Paper Tigers: The Legal Boundaries of Education Governance." In Who's in Cliarge Here? The Tangled Web of School Governance and Policy, ed. Noel Epstein. Washington, DC: Brookings.
59. Ryan, Susan, and Serah Fatani. 2005. "SES Tutoring Programs: An Evaluation of the Second Year-Part One of a Two Part Report." Policy report, Office of Research, Evaluation and Accountability, Chicago Public Schools, Chicago.
60. Smith, Kevin B. 2003. The Ideology of Education; The. Commonwealth, the Market, and America's Schools. Albany: State University of New York Press.
61. Spellings, Margaret. 2005a. Letter from U.S. Education Secretary to Chief Executive Officer of Chicago Public Schools. November 3, http://www.ed.gov/ policy/elsec/ guid/stateletters/chicago.html.
62. Spellings, Margaret. 2005b. Letter from U.S. Education Secretary to President of Virginia Board of Education. August 25, http://www.ed.gov/admins/ lead/account/ letters/acva5.html.
63. Sunderman, Gail L., and James S. Kim. 2005. "The Expansion of Federal Power and the Politics of Implementing the No Child Left Behind Act." Teachers College Record, November 3, http://www.tcrecord.org.
64. Sunderman, Gail L., James S. Kim, and Gary Orfield. 2005. NCLB Meets School Realities: Lessons from the Field. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
65. Sunderman, Gail L., and Jimmy Kim. 2004. Increasing Bureaucracy or Increasing Opportunities? School District Experience with Supplemental Educational Services. Policy report. Cambridge, MA: Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.
66. Superfine, Benjamin Michael. 2005. "The Politics of Accountability: The Rise and Fall of Goals 2000." American Journal of Education 112 (1): 10-43.
67. U.S. Department of Education. 2004a. Early Implementation of Supplemental Educational Services under the No Child Left Behind Act: Tear One Report. Policy report by Leslie M. Anderson and Lisa Weiner. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
68. U.S. Department of Education. 2004b. Innovations in Education: Creating Strong Supplemental Educational Services Programs. Policy report by WestEd. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
69. U.S. Department of Education. 2005a. Case Studies of Supplemental Educational Services under the No Child Left Behind Act: Findings from 2003-04. Policy report by Leslie M. Anderson and Katrina G. Laguarda. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
70. U.S. Department of Education. 2005b. "Helping Families by Supporting and Expanding Choice." Fact sheet (August), U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC.
71. U.S. Department of Education. 2005c. "No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 Annual Report to Congress." Policy report, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC.
72. U.S. Department of Education. 2005d. "Supplemental Educational Services Nonregulatory Guidance." Washington, DC.
73. U.S. Department of Education. 2005e. "Supplemental Educational Services Pilot Programs." Fact sheet (September), U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC.
74. U.S. Government Accountability Office. 2004. No Child Left Behind Act: Education Needs to Provide Technical Assistance and Conduct Implementation Studies fir School Choice Provision. Policy report. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accountability Office.
75. Van Dunk, Emily, and Anneliese M. Dickman. 2003. School Choice and the Question of Accountability. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
76. Wirt, Frederick M., and Michael W Kirst. 2005. The Political Dynamics of American Education. 3rd ed. Richmond, CA: McCutchan.
77. Wong, Kenneth. 2003. "Federal Title 1 as a Reform Strategy in Urban Schools." In Reinterpreting Urban School Reform: Have Urban Schools Failed or Has the Reform Movement Failed Urban Schools? ed. Louis F. Miron and Edward P. St. John. Albany: State University of New York Press.