Implementing the No Child Left Behind Act: Challenges for the states

Peabody Journal of Education

Volumn 80, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 73-89

  Goertz, Margaret E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 19844382872     PISSN: 0161956X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327930pje8002_5     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Abedi, J., & Dietel, R. (2004). Challenges in the No Child Left Behind Act for English language learners. CRESST Policy Brief 7. Retrieved April 20, 2004, from http://cresst96.cse.ucla.edu/products/ newsletters/policybrief7.pdf
2. Bolt, S., Krentz, J., & Thurlow, M. (2002). Are we there yet? Accountability for the performance of students with disabilities (Tech. Rep. No. 33). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved April 15, 2003, from http:// education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/Technical33.htm
3. Center on Education Policy. (2004). From the Capitol to the classroom: Year 2 of the No Child Left Behind Act. Washington, DC: Author.
4. Driscoll, W., & Fleeter, H. (2003). Projected costs of implementing the federal "No Child Left Behind Act" in Ohio (prepared for the Ohio Department of Education). Columbus, OH: Author.
5. Federal Register. (2003, December 9). Title I: 34 CFR Part 200: Sec. 200.13 as adopted in the final regulations published in the Federal Register (68 FR 68697). Retrieved April 2, 2004, from http:// wais.access.gpo.gov
6. Goertz, M. E. (2001). Standards-based accountability: Horse trade or horse whip? In S. H. Fuhrman (Ed.), From capitol to the classroom: Standards-based reform in the states (pp. 39-59). One hundredth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. Goertz, M. E., & Duffy, M. C. (2001). Assessment and accountability systems in the 50 states: 1999-2000. RR -046. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
8. Hoff, D. J. (2004, March 10). Accountability conflicts vex schools. Education Week, 23(26), 1.
9. Improving America's Schools Act of 1994, Pub. L. No. 103-82.
10. Jenny, N. W. (2003, November). State tax revenue shows slight improvement. The Rockefeller Institute State Fiscal News, 3(8). Retrieved December 3, 2003, from http://StateAndLocalGateway. rockinst.org
11. Kossan, P. (2003, September 29). 220 schools in Arizona on feds' underachieve list. The Arizona Republic. Retrieved July 23, 2004, from http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic
12. Mathis, W. (2005/this issue). The cost of implementing the Federal No Child Left Behind Act: Different assumptions, different answers. Peabody Journal of Education, 80(2), 91-120.
13. McNichol, E., & Harris, M. (2004). Many states cut budgets as fiscal squeeze continues. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Retrieved April 23, 2004, from www.cbpp.org/4-22-04sfp.htm
14. National Assessment of Title I, Independent Review Panel (NATI/IRP). (2001). Improving the odds. Washington, DC: Council for Basic Education.
15. National Governors Association/National Association of State Budget Officers. (2002, November). The fiscal survey of states. Retrieved April 9, 2003, from www.nasbo.org/publications/fiscalsurvey/ nov2002fiscalsurvey-revisedc.pdf
16. National Governors Association/National Association of State Budget Officers. (2003, December). The fiscal survey of states. Retrieved December 28, 2003, from www.nasbo.org/publications/fiscsurv/ fsfall2003.pdf
17. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110.
18. Olson L. (2003, December 10). In ESEA wake, school data flowing forth. Education Week, 23(15), 1.
19. Richard, A. (2004, January 7). States unable to help all struggling schools. Education Week, 23(16), 19.
20. Schemo, D. J. (2004, March 25). 14 states ask U.S. to revise some education law rules. New York Times. Retrieved March 30, 2004, from http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/25/education/25CHIL.html
21. Shields, P. M., Laguarda, K. G., Lash, A., Lopez, A., Padilla, C., Skolnik, H., et al. (2003). Evaluation of Title I accountability systems and school improvement efforts (TASSIE): Second-year Technical Report (draft). Palo Alto, CA: SRI International.
22. Shields, P. M., Lash, A., Padilla, C., Woodworth, K., & Laguarda, K. G. (2004). Evaluation of Title I accountability systems and school improvement efforts (TASSIE): Second-year findings. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
23. Thurlow, M. L. (2003). Biting the bullet: Including special needs students in accountability systems. In S. H. Fuhrman & R. F. Elmore (Eds.), Redesigning accountability systems for education (pp. 115-137). New York: Teachers College Press.
24. Thurlow, M. L., Lazarus, S., Thompson, S., & Robey, J. (2002). 2001 state policies on assessment participation and accommodations. (Synthesis Rep. No. 46). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
25. Title I Monitor. (2004, July). Census updates slash Title I funding for over half of nation's school districts. Title I Monitor, 9(7), 1, 8-15.
26. U.S. Department of Education, Planning and Evaluation Service. (2001). High standards for all students: A report from the National Assessment of Title I on progress and challenges since the 1994 reauthorization. Washington, DC: Author.
27. U.S. General Accounting Office. (2003). Title I: Characteristics of tests will influence expenses; information sharing may help states realize efficiencies. GAO-03-389. Washington, DC: Author.