Federal title I as a reform strategy in urban schools

Reinterpreting Urban School Reform: Have Urban Schools Failed, or Has the Reform Movement Failed Urban Schools?

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 55-76

  Wong, Kenneth K ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24344470403     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (36)

1. Bodilly, S. and M. Berends. 1999. Necessary district support for comprehensive school reform. In Hard Work for Good Schools: Facts Not Fads in Title I Reform, ed. G. Orfield and E. DeBray. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University, Civil Rights Project.
2. Elmore, R. 1980. Backward mapping: Implementation research and policy decisions. Political Science Quarterly 94(4):601-16.
3. Kanstoroom, M. and T. Palmaffy. Forthcoming. Using market forces to make Title I more effective. In Accountability, Efficiency and Equity Issues in Title I Schoolwide Program Implementation, ed. K. Wong and M. Wang. Greenwich, Conn.: Information Age Publishing.
4. Kirst, M. 1988. The federal role and Chapter 1: Rethinking some basic assumptions. In Federal Aid to the Disadvantaged: What Future for Chapter 1?, ed. D. Doyle and B. Cooper. London: Falmer Press.
5. Lowi, T. 1964. American business, public policy, case studies, and political theory. World Politics 16(4):677-715.
6. Martin, R. and P. McClure. 1969. Title I of ESEA: Is it helping poor children? Washington, D. C.: Washington Research Project of the Southern Center for Studies in Public Policy and the NAACP Legal Defense of Education Fund.
7. McLaughlin, M. 1987. Learning from experience: Lessons form policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 9(2):171-78.
8. -. 1990. The Rand change agent study revisited: Macro perspective and realities. Educational Researcher 19(9):11-16.
9. McLaughlin, M. and P. Berman. Federal Program Supporting Educational Change Vol. 8, 1978, Washington, D. C.: U. S. Office of Education.
10. Millsap, M. A., B. Turnbull, M. Moss, N. Brigham, B. Gams., and E. Marks. 1992. The Chapter 1 implementation study: Interim report. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office.
11. National Association of State Coordinators of Compensatory Education. 1996. Distinguished schools report 1995-1996 school year: Title I schoolwide projects. Washington, D. C.: Author.
12. Peterson, P. E. 1981. City limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. Peterson, P. E. and C. Noyes. 1997. School choice in Milwaukee. In New schools for a new century, ed. D. Ravitch and J. Viteritti. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
14. Peterson, P. E., B. Rab., and K. Wong. 1986. When federalism works. Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institution.
15. Ravitch, D. and J. Viteritti, eds. 1997. New schools for a new century. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
16. Schenck, E. A. and S. Beckstrom. 1993. Chapter I schoolwide project study: Final report. Hampton, N. H.: RMC Research.
17. Slavin, R. E., N. A. Madden, L. J. Dolan, B. A. Wasik, S. Ross, L. Smit., and M. Dianda. 1996. Success for all: A summary of research. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk I (1): 41-76.
18. Smith, M. S. 1988. Selecting students and services for Chapter 1. In Federal aid to the disadvantaged: What future for Chapter 1?, ed. D. Doyle and B. Cooper. London: Falmer Press.
19. Stringfield, S., M. A. Millsap, R. Herman, N. Yoder, N. Brigham, P. Nesselrodt, E. Schaffer, N. Karweit, M. Levi., and R. Stevens. 1997. Urban and suburban/rural special strategies for educating disadvantaged children: Final report. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office.
20. Stringfield, S., L. Winfield, M. A. Millsap, M. Puma, B. Gams., and B. Randall. 1994. Urban and suburban/rural special strategies for educating disadvantaged children: First year report. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office.
21. Timar, T. 1992. Program design and assessment strategies in Chapter 1. In Rethinking policy for at-risk students, ed. K. K. Wong and M. C. Wang. Berkeley, Calif.: McCutchan.
22. Turnbull, B. J., S. Zeldi., and T. Cain. 1990. State administration of the amended Chapter 1 program. Washington, D. C.: Policy Studies Associates.
23. U. S. Congress. 1965. The Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, Pub. L. 89-10, 89th Cong., 1st Sess., 11 April 1965, 779 Stat.27, Sec.201.
24. U. S. Department of Education. 1992. National assessment of the Chapter 1 program: The interim report. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office.
25. -. 1993. Reinventing Chapter 1: The current Chapter 1 program and new directions, final report of the national assessment of the Chapter 1 program. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office.
26. U. S. General Accounting Office. 1992. Compensatory education: Most Chapter 1 funds in eight districts used for classroom services. Washington D. C.: Author.
27. Walberg, H. 1998. Uncompetitive American schools: Causes and cures. In Brookings Papers on Education Policy 1998, ed. D. Ravitch. Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institution.
28. Wang, M., K. Won., and J. R. Kim. 1999. The need for developing procedural accountability in Title I schoolwide programs. In Hard work for good schools: Facts not fads in Title I reform, ed. G. Orfield and E. DeBray. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University, Civil Rights Project.
29. Wilson, W. J. 1987. The truly disadvantaged. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30. Winfield, L. F. and R. Hawkins. 1993. Longitudinal effects of Chapter 1 schoolwide projects on the achievement of disadvantaged students. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
31. Wong, K. K. 1990. City choices: Education and housing. Albany: State University of New York Press.
32. -. 1999. Funding public schools: Politics and policy. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
33. -. 2000. Chicago school reform: From decentralization to integrated governance. Journal of Educational Change 1(1):97-105.
34. Wong, K. and S. Meyer. 1998. Title I schoolwide programs: A synthesis of findings from recent evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 20(2):115-36.
35. Wong, K., G. Sunderma., and J. Lee. 1997. Redesigning the federal compensatory education program: Lessons from the implementation of the Title I schoolwide projects. In Implementing school reform: Practice and policy imperatives, ed. M. Wang and K. Wong. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
36. -. 1997. Redesigning the federal compensatory education program: Lessons from the implementation of the Title I schoolwide projects. In Implementing school reform: Practic and policy imperatives, ed. M. C. Wong and K. Wong. Philadelphia: Temple University Center for Research in Human Development and Education.