An extended keystroke level model (KLM) for predicting the visual demand of in-vehicle information systems

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1515-1524

  Pettitt, Michael ^a   Burnett, Gary ^a   Stevens, Alan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b TRANSPORT RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Driver distraction; HCI; In vehicle information systems; Keystroke level model; Occlusion

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; ROBUST CONTROL; VEHICLES;

COST EVALUATION; DRIVER DISTRACTION; FIRST-PASS DESIGN TOOLS; KEYSTROKE LEVEL MODELS; OCCLUSIONS;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 35348848543     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1240624.1240852     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers. Statement of Principles, Criteria and Verification Procedures on Driver Interactions with Advanced In-Vehicle Information and Communication Systems. Version 3.0. Washington, D.C June 17th 2003.
2. Asoh, T. and Iihoshi, A. Occlusion method to evaluate visual distraction to be caused by using car navigation systems. Presentation at Driver Metrics Workshop, Ottawa, Canada, 2006. Available at: http://ppc.uiowa.edu/ drivermetricsworkshop/
3. Special issue on the Occlusion technique. Applied Ergonomics, 35 (2004), 185-232.
4. Bengler, K. Occlusion: a method to assess visual and interruptability. Presentation at Driver Metrics Workshop, Ottawa, Canada, 2006. Available at: http://ppc.uiowa.edu/drivermetricsworkshop/
5. Bishop, R. Intelligent Vehicle Technology and Trends. Artech House Books, London, UK, 2005.
6. Burnett, G.E., Summerskill, S.J. and Porter, J.M. On the move destination entry for vehicle navigation systems: unsafe by any means? Behaviour and Information Technology, 23(4) (2004), 265-272.
7. Card, S.K., Moran, T.P. and Newell, A. The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence-Erlbaum Associates, London, UK, 1983.
8. Green, P. The 15-second rule for driver information systems. Proc. ITS America 1999.
9. Green, P. Crashes induced by driver information systems and what can be done to reduce them. SAE paper 2000-01-C008. http://www.umich.edu/~driving/ publications/SAE2000-01-C008.pdf
10. Green, P. Motor vehicle driver interfaces. In Jacko, J.A. and Sears, A. (eds.) The Human Computer Interactions Handbook. Lawrence-Erlbaum Associates, UK, 2003, 844-860.
11. ISO. Road vehicles - Ergonomic aspects of transport information and control systems - Occlusion method to assess visual distraction due to the use of in-vehicle information and communication systems. Draft International Standard ISO/DIS 16673 ISO/TC 22/SC 13, 2005.
12. ISO. Road vehicles - Ergonomic aspects of transport information and control systems - Occlusion method to assess visual distraction due to the use of in-vehicle information and communication systems. Draft International Standard ISO/DIS 16673.2 ISO/TC 22/SC 13, 2006.
13. John, B.E., Prevas, K., Salvucci, D.D. and Koedinger, K. Predictive human performance modeling made easy. Proc. CHI 2004.
14. John, B.E. and Salvucci, D.D. Multipurpose prototypes for assessing user interfaces in pervasive computing systems. IEEE Pervasive Computing 4(4) (2005), 27-34.
15. John, B.E., Salvucci, D.D., Centgraf, P., Prevas, K. Integrating models and tools in the context of driving and in-vehicle devices. Proc. Int. Conf. on Cognitive Modelling 2004
16. Lansdown, T.C., Burns, P.C. and Parkes, A.M. Perspectives on occlusion and requirements for validation. Applied Ergonomics, 35 (2004), 225-232.
17. Luo, L. and John, B.E. Predicting task execution time on handheld devices using the keystroke-level model. Proc. CHI 2005.
18. Manes, D., Green, P. and Hunter, D. Prediction of destination entry and retrieval times using keystroke level models. Report No. UMTRI-96-37, UMTRI, University of Michigan, 1998. http://www.itsdocs.fhwa.dot.gov/jpodocs/repts_te/ 7m101!.pdf
19. Milgram, P. A spectacle-mounted Liquid-Crystal Tachistoscope. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 19(5) (1987), 449-456.
20. Myung, R. Keystroke-level analysis of Korean text entry methods on mobile phones. Int. J. of Human-Computer Studies, 60 (2004), 545-563.
21. Neale, V.L., Dingus, T.A., Klauer, S.G., Sudweeks, J. and Goodman, M. An overview of the 100-car naturalistic study and findings. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Paper No. 05-0400. 2005. United States.
22. Noy, Y.I., Lemoine, T.L., Klachan, C. and Burns, P.C. Task interruptability and duration as measures of visual distraction. Applied Ergonomics, 35 (2004), 207-213.
23. Pettitt, M.A., Burnett, G.E. and Stevens, A. Defining driver distraction. Proc. World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems 2005.
24. Pettitt, M.A., Burnett, G.E. and Karbassioun, D. Applying the keystroke level model in a driving context. In Contemporary Ergonomics: Proc. Ergonomics Society Annual Conference 2006, Taylor & Francis, UK, 219-223.
25. Pettitt, M.A., Burnett, G.E., Bayer, S. and Stevens, A. Assessment of the occlusion technique as a means for evaluating the distraction potential of driver support systems. IEE Proc. Intelligent Transport Systems, 4 (2006), 259-266.
26. Pettitt, M.A., Burnett, G.E. and Stevens, A. Extending the keystroke level model (KLM) to assess the visual demand of an in-vehicle information system (IVIS). Proc. World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems 2006.
27. Raskin, J. The Humane Interface. Addison-Wesley, London, UK, 2000.
28. Salvucci, D.D. Predicting the effects of in-car interface use on driver performance: an integrated model approach. Int. J. of Human Computer Studies, 55 (2001), 85-107.
29. Salvucci, D.D., Zuber, M., Beregovaia, E. and Markley, D. Distract-R: rapid prototyping and evaluation of in-vehicle interfaces. Proc. CHI 2005.
30. Senders, J.W., Kristofferson, A.B., Levision, W., Dietrich, C.W. and Ward, J.L. The attentional demand of automobile driving. Highway Res. Rea, 195 (1967), 13-15.
31. Stanton, N.A. and Young, M.S. Giving ergonomics away? The application of ergonomics methods by novices. Applied Ergonomics, 34 (2003), 539-545.
32. Stevens, A. and Minton, R. In-vehicle distraction and fatal accidents in England and Wales. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 33 (2001), 539-545.
33. Stevens, A., Quimby, A., Board, A and Rai, G. Development of human factors guidelines for in-vehicle information systems. Proc. World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems 2002.
34. Stevens, A., Bygrave, S., Brook-Carter, N. and Luke, T. Occlusion as a technique for measuring in-vehicle information systems (IVIS) distraction: a research literature review. Transport Research Laboratory (TRL) report no. TRL609, 2004. TRL, Crowthorne, Berkshire, UK.
35. The Times. Some drivers will pay less under 'intelligent' congestion charging. June 27th 2006. http://driving.timesonline.co.uk/article/0, 27492244427_1,00.html
36. Tijerina, L. CAMP driver workload metrics project: correlation of the R metric with driver performance and prior prediction. Presentation at Driver Metrics Workshop, Ottawa, Canada, 2006. Available at: http://ppc.uiowa.edu/ drivermetricsworkshop/
37. Tijerina, L., Johnston, S., Parmer, E., Winterbottom, M.D. and Goodman, M. Driver distraction with Route Guidance Systems. Report No. DOT HS 809-069. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington D.C., USA.
38. Wang, J., Knipling, R.R. and Goodman, M.J. The role of driver inattention in crashes: new statistics from the 1995 crashworthiness data system. Proc. Advancement for Automotive Medicine 1996.
39. Young, K., Regan, M. and Hammer, M. Driver distraction: a review of the literature. Monash University Accident Research Centre, Report No. 206, 2003.