Extending the keystroke level model (KLM) to assess the visual demand of in-vehicle information systems (IVIS)

13th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems and Services

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages

  Pettitt, Michael ^a   Burnett, Gary ^a   Stevens, Alan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b TRANSPORT RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Driver distraction; In vehicle information systems; Keystroke level model; Occlusion

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS; AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; TRAFFIC CONTROL; TRANSPORTATION;

COMPUTING TECHNOLOGY; DRIVER DISTRACTIONS; IN-VEHICLE INFORMATION SYSTEM; KEY-STROKE LEVEL MODELS; OCCLUSION; OCCLUSION TECHNIQUE; SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT; VISUAL DEMAND;

INTELLIGENT VEHICLE HIGHWAY SYSTEMS;

EID: 84950166199     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Bishop, R., 2005, Intelligent Vehicle Technology and Trends (London: Artech House Books)
2. Burnett, G. E., Summerskill, S. J., & Porter, J. M., 2004, On-The move destination entry for vehicle navigation systems: unsafe by any means? Behaviour and Information Technology, 23(4), 265-272
3. Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., and Newell, A., 1983, The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction, (Lawrence-Erlbaum Associates, London)
4. Dewar, R. E., 2002, Vehicle Design. In Human Factors in Traffic Safety, Dewar, R. E. & Obson, P. L. (Eds. ) (USA: Lawyers & Judges Publishing Company, Inc. ), 303-339
5. Goujon, S., 2001, First evaluation of possible occlusion technique criteria. LAB PSA, Peugeot-Citroen/Renault, Workshop on Occlusion, Torino, Italy, 12-13th November 2001
6. Green, P., 1999, The 15-second rule for driver information systems. Proceedings of the ITS America ninth annual meeting, Washington, D. C.
7. Green, P., 2000, Crashes induced by driver information systems and what can be done to reduce them. SAE paper 2000-01-C008
8. Green, P., 2003, Motor vehicle driver interfaces. In J. A. Jacko and . Sears (eds. ) The Human Computer Interactions Handbook, (Lawrence-Erlbaum Associates, UK), 844-860
9. ISO, 2004, Road vehicles-Ergonomic aspects of transport information and control systems-Occlusion method to assess visual distraction due to the use of in-vehicle information and communication systems.committee Draft Standard ISO/CD 16673. ISO/TC 22/SC 13
10. ISO, 2005, Road vehicles-Ergonomic aspects of transport information and control systems-Occlusion method to assess visual distraction due to the use of in-vehicle information and communication systems. Draft International Standard ISO/DIS 16673. ISO/TC 22/SC 13.
11. ISO, 2006, Road vehicles-Ergonomic aspects of transport information and control systems-Occlusion method to assess visual distraction due to the use of in-vehicle information and communication systems. Draft International Standard ISO/DIS 16673. 2 ISO/TC 22/SC 13.
12. John, B. E., 1995, Why GOMS? Interactions, October 1995: 80-89
13. Karlsson, R. & Fichtenberg, N., 2001, How different occlusion intervals affect total shutter open time. Volvo Car Corporation, August 2001. Workshop on Occlusion, Torino, Italy, 12-13th November 2001
14. Manes, D., Green, P. & Hunter, D., 1998, Prediction of destination entry and retrieval times using keystroke level models. Report No. UMTRI-96-37, UMTRI, University of Michigan, Michigan.
15. Michon, J. A. (Ed. ), 1993, Generic Intelligent Driver Support: A Comprehensive Report on the GIDS Project (London: Taylor & Francis)
16. Myung, R., 2004, Keystroke-level analysis of Korean text entry methods on mobile phones. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 60: 545-563
17. Pettitt, M. A., Burnett, G. E. & Stevens, A., 2005, Defining driver distraction. Proceedings of World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, November 2005, San Francisco, USA
18. Pettitt, M. A., Burnett, G. E., Bayer, S., & Stevens, A., 2006(a), Assessment of the occlusion technique as a means for evaluating the distraction potential of driver support systems. Accepted for publication in IEE-Intelligent Transport Systems, August 2006. Department of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Nottingham
19. Pettitt, M., Burnett, G. & Karbassioun, D., 2006 (b), Applying the keystroke level model in a driving context. In P. D. Bust (ed) Contemporary Ergonomics: Proceedings of the Ergonomics Society Annual Conference, (Taylor & Francis, UK), 219-223
20. Raskin, J., 2000, The Humane Interface (Addison-Wesley, London)
21. Salvucci, D. D., 2001, Predicting the effects of in-car interface use on driver performance: an integrated model approach. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 55: 85-107
22. Stanton, N. A. & Young, M. S., 2003, Giving ergonomics away? The application of ergonomics methods by novices. Applied Ergonomics 34: 479-490
23. Stevens, A. & Minton, R., 2001, In-vehicle distraction and fatal accidents in England and Wales, Accident Analysis and Prevention 33: 539-545
24. Stevens, A., Bygrave, S., Brook-Carter, N., Luke, T., 2004, Occlusion as a technique for measuring in-vehicle information system (IVIS) visual distraction: a research literature review. Transport Research Laboratory (TRL) report no. TRL609. TRL, Crowthorne, Berkshire, United Kingdom
25. Stevens A, A Quimby, A Board and G Rai. Development of human factors guidelines for in-vehicle information systems. 9th World Congress on
26. ITS, Chicago, 14-17 October 2002. (CD-Rom) ITS America www. itsa.org. Translucent Technologies, 2005, http://home. ca. inter.net/~milgram/
27. Wang, J., Knipling, R. R., & Goodman, M. J., 1996, The role of driver inattention in crashes: new statistics from the 1995 crashworthiness data system, 40th annual proceedings for the advancement of automotive medicine, Vancouver, British Columbia, 377-392
28. Young, K., Regan, M., & Hammer, M., 2003, Driver distraction: a review of the literature, Monash University Accident Research Centre, Report No. 206, November 2003