Methodological aspects of functional neuroimaging at high field strength: A critical review;Methodische aspekte der funktionellen neurobildgebung im MRT-hochfeldbereich: Eine kritische übersicht

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 179, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 925-931

  Scheef, Lukas ^a   Landsberg, M W ^a   Boecker, H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Brain; High field strength; MR functional imaging; Review; Technical aspects

Indexed keywords

ARTIFACT; CONTRAST; COST; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NEUROIMAGING; NOISE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION FIELD; RADIODIAGNOSTIC EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES; REVIEW; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; BRAIN; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FORECASTING; IMAGE PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ARTIFACTS; BRAIN; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; FORECASTING; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, THEORETICAL; REST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 35148886688     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-963195     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Giesel FL, Wustenberg T, Bongers A et al. MR-basierte Methoden der funktionellen Bildgebung des zentralen Nervensystems. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2005; 177: 714-730
2. Heiland S. MR-Methoden für funktionelle Untersuchungen des Gehirns. 86. Deutscher Röntgenkongress. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2005; 177: S324
3. nd. International Symposium "Highfield MR in Clinical Applications". Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 433
4. Scheef L, Neuloh G, Brockmöller T et al. Rekonstruktion intraoperativer Elektroden-Grids zum direkten Vergleich funktioneller MR-Ergebnisse mit intraoperativer Stimulation. 85. Deutscher Röntgenkongress. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: S159
5. Stippich C, Heiland S, Tronnier V et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging: Physiological background, technical aspects and prerequisites for clinical use. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2002; 174: 43-49
6. Prothmann S, Puccini S, Dalitz B et al. Präoperatives Mapping der Sprachareale mittels funktioneller Magnetresonanztomographie (fMRT) bei Patienten mit Hirntumoren: Paradigmenvergleich. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2005; 177: 1522-1531
7. Schild H. Clinical highfield MR. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2005; 177: 621-623
8. Stanisz GJ, Odrobina EE, Pun J et al. T1, T2 relaxation and magnetization transfer in tissue at 3T. Magn Reson Med 2005; 54: 507-512
9. Triantafyllou C, Hoge RD, Krueger G et al. Comparison of physiological noise at 1.5 T, 3 T and 7 T and optimization of fMRI acquisition parameters. Neuroimage 2005; 26: 243-250
10. Kruger G, Kastrup A, Glover GH. Neuroimaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: comparison of oxygenation-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 2001; 45: 595-604
11. Ogawa S, Lee TM, Kay AR et al. Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1990; 87: 9868-9872
12. Turner R, Jezzard P, Wen H et al. Functional mapping of the human visual cortex at 4 and 1.5 tesla using deoxygenation contrast EPI. Magn Reson Med 1993; 29: 277-279
13. Gati JS, Menon RS, Ugurbil K et al. Experimental determination of the BOLD field strength dependence in vessels and tissue. Magn Reson Med 1997; 38: 296-302
14. Krasnow B, Tamm L, Greicius MD et al. Comparison of fMRI activation at 3 and 1.5 T during perceptual, cognitive, and affective processing. Neuroimage 2003; 18: 813-826
15. Schmidt CF, Boesiger P, Ishai A. Comparison of fMRI activation as measured with gradient- and spin-echo EPI during visual perception. Neuroimage 2005; 26: 852-859
16. Glover GH, Law CS. Spiral-in/out BOLD fMRI for increased SNR and reduced susceptibility artifacts. Magn Reson Med 2001; 46: 515-522
17. Glover GH, Lai S. Self-navigated spiral fMRI: interleaved versus singleshot. Magn Reson Med 1998; 39: 361-368
18. Lu H, Mazaheri Y, Zhang R et al. Multishot partial-k-space EPI for high-resolution fMRI demonstrated in a rat whisker barrel stimulation model at 3T. Magn Reson Med 2003; 50: 1215-1222
19. Liu G, Sobering G, Duyn J et al. A functional MRI technique combining principles of echo-shifting with a train of observations (PRESTO). Magn Reson Med 1993; 30: 764-768
20. Ramsey NF, van den Brink JS, van Muiswinkel AM et al. Phase navigator correction in 3D fMRI improves detection of brain activation: quantitative assessment with a graded motor activation procedure. Neuroimage 1998; 8: 240-248
21. Klarhofer M, Dilharreguy B, van Gelderen GP et al. A PRESTO-SENSE sequence with alternating partial-Fourier encoding for rapid susceptibility-weighted 3D MRI time series. Magn Reson Med 2003; 50: 830-838
22. Golay X, de Zwart JA, Ho YC et al. Parallel imaging techniques in functional MRI. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 15: 255-265
23. Ravicz ME, Melcher JR, Kiang NY. Acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Acoust Soc Am 2000; 108: 1683-1696
24. Moelker A, Wielopolski PA, Pattynama PM. Relationship between magnetic field strength and magnetic-resonance-related acoustic noise levels. MAGMA 2003; 16: 52-55
25. Ruggero MA, Rich NC, Redo A. The effect of intense acoustic stimulation on basilar-membrane vibrations. Auditory Neuroscience 1996; 2: 329-345
26. Chambers J, Akeroyd MA, Summerfield AQ et al. Active conti ol of the volume acquisition noise in functional magnetic resonance imaging: method and psychoacoustical evaluation. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 110: 3041-3054
27. Edelstein WA, Kidane TK, Taracila V et al. Active-passive gradient shielding for MRl acoustic noise reduction. Magn Reson Med 2005; 53: 1013-1017
28. rd International Symposium on Highfield MR in Clinical Applications. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2006; 178: 115-127
29. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB et al. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999; 42: 952-962
30. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM et al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 2002; 47: 1202-1210
31. Hermans EJ, Neggers SF, Ramsey NF. Ultra-fast three dimensional PRESTO-SENSE imaging with full btain coverage on a clinical 3T scanner. 12th Annual Meeting of Organization of Human Brain Mapping. Neuroimage 2006; 31: 197
32. Golay X, Pruessmann KP, Weiger M et al. PRESTO-SENSE: an ultrafast whole-brain fMRI technique. Magn Reson Med 2000; 43: 779-786
33. Yang QX, Wang J, Smith MB et al. Reduction of magnetic field inhomogeneity artifacts in echo planar imaging with SENSE and GESEPI at high field. Magn Reson Med 2004; 52: 1418-1423
34. de Zwart JA, van Gelderen F, Golay X et al. Accelerated parallel imaging for functional imaging of the human brain. NMR Biomed 2006; 19: 342-351
35. de Zwart JA, van Gelderen P, Kellman P et al. Application of sensitivity-encoded echo-planar imaging for blood oxygen level-dependent functional brain imaging. Magn Reson Med 2002; 48: 1011-1020
36. Preibisch C, Pilatus U, Bunke J et al. Functional MRI using sensitivity-encoded echo planar imaging (SENSE-EPI). Neuroimage 2003; 19: 412-421
37. Wiesinger F, Van de Moortele PF, Adriany G et al. Potential and feasibility of parallel MRI at high field. NMR Biomed 2006; 19: 368-378
38. Obliger MA, Grant AK, Sodickson DK. Ultimate intrinsic signal-to-noise ratio for parallel MRI: electromagnetic field considerations. Magn Reson Med 2003; 50: 1018-1030
39. Oshio K, Feinberg DA. GRASE (Gradient- and spin-echo) imaging: a novel fast MRI technique. Magn Reson Med 1991; 20: 344-349
40. Bandettini PA, Wong EC, Jesmanowicz A et al. Spin-echo and gradientecho EPI of human brain activation using BOLD contrast: a comparative study at 1.5 T. NMR Biomed 1994; 7: 12-20
41. Norris DG, Zysset S, Mildner T et al. An investigation of the value of spin-echo-based fMRI using a Stroop color-word matching task and EPI at 3 T. Neuroimage 2002; 15: 719-726
42. Vacoub E, Van de Moortele PF, Shmuel A et al. Signal and noise characteristics of Hahn SE and GE BOLD fMRI at 7 T in humans. Neuroimage 2005; 24: 738-750
43. Harel N, Lin J, Moeller S et al. Combined imaging-histological study of cortical laminar specificity of fMRI signals. Neuroimage 2006; 29: 879-887
44. Hoenig K, Kuhl CK, Scheef L. Functional 3.0-T MR assessment of higher cognitive function: are there advantages over 1.5-T imaging? Radiology 2005; 234: 860-868
45. Yang Y, Wen H, Mattay VS et al. Comparison of 3D BOLD functional MRI with spiral acquisition at 1.5 and 4.0 T. Neuroimage 1999; 9: 446-451
46. Fera F, Yongbi MN, van Gelderen P et al. EPI-BOLD fMRI of human motor cortex at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: sensitivity dependence on echo time and acquisition bandwidth. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 19: 19-26
47. Beisteiner R, Windischberger C, Lanzenberger R et al. Finger somatotopy in human motor cortex. Neuroimage 2001; 13: 1016-1026
48. Maldjian JA, Gottschalk A, Patel RS et al. The sensory somatotopic map of the human hand demonstrated at 4 Tesla. Neuroimage 1999; 10: 55-62
49. Overduin SA, Servos P. Distributed digit somatotopy in primary somatosensory cortex. Neuroimage 2004; 23: 462-472
50. Menon RS, Ogawa S, Strupp JP et al. Ocular dominance in human V1 demonstrated by functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurophysiol 1997; 77: 2780-2787
51. Zou KH, Greve DN, Wang M et al. Reproducibility of functional MR imaging: preliminary results of prospective multi-institutional study performed by Biomedical Informatics Research Network. Radiology 2005; 237: 781-789