Clinical highfield MR;Klinische hochfeld-MRT

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 177, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 621-631

  Schild, H ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BONN   (Germany)

^b Radiologische Klinik   (Germany)

Author keywords

3 Tesla; Highfield MR; MR artefacts; MR diagnosis; MRI; SAR

Indexed keywords

ARTIFACT; BRAIN BLOOD VESSEL; BRAIN DISEASE; BRAIN PERFUSION; BRAIN RADIOGRAPHY; CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; GLIOBLASTOMA; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; VASCULARIZATION;

BRAIN; BRAIN DISEASES; BRAIN MAPPING; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES;

EID: 20844444964     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-858048     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. Bachmann RS, Krämer W, Schwindt H et al. FLAIR-Imaging in multiple sclerosis: A comparative MR-study at 1.5 and 3.0 T. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176 (Suppl.): 114
2. Behrends K, Lutterbey G, von Falkenhausen M et al. MRI of the Knee 3.0 Tvs 1.5 T. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176 (Suppl.): 201
3. Block W. Real-time fMRI-guided proton MR spectroscopy in ALS patients at 3T. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2003; 175: 432
4. Born M, Gieseke J, Krautmacher C et al. Prävalenz von Nebenwirkungen der klinischen Hochfeld-MRT bei 3 Tesla - Intraindividueller Vergleich mit 1,5 T. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2003; 175: 261
5. Born M, Willinek W, Gieseke J et al. CE-MRA of abdominal and peripheral vessels at 3.0 T - initial experiences. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 440
6. Dydak U, Maier D, Lamerichs R et al. Using the high spectral resolution at 3T for speeding up MRSI. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 432
7. von Falkenhausen M, Gieseke J, Kühl CK et al. Liver MR at 3T. Feasibility and limitations. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 437
8. Gieseke J, Manka CH, Scheef L et al. Kurze Messzeiten bei hochaufgelösten T1-gewichteten MR-Aufnahmen zur Darstellung kortikaler Dysplasien mit der SENSE-Technik bei 3T. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2003; 175: 201
9. Gieseke J, Manka CH, Scheef L et al. Diffusionsgewichtete MRT-Aufnahmen mit SENSE bei 3T. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2003; 175 (Suppl.): 202
10. Gieseke J, Kuhl CK, von Falkenhausen M et al. G. Ultra Fast T2-weighted TSE sequences with Flip Angle Sweep and SENSE at 3T. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 2004; 11: 74
11. Gieseke J, Morakkabati-Spitz N, Kuhl CK et al. SAR-Reduktion mit variabler HF-Refokussierung und paralleler Bildgebung bei 3T. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176 (Suppl.): 222
12. Guer O, Traeber F, Block W et al. Diffusionstensor-Bildgebung und Fiber Tracking mit Hochfeld-MRT und paralleler Bildgebung (SENSitivity Encoding, SENSE). Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176 (Suppl.): 160
13. Graf G, Helms G, Seemann M et al. High-resolution MRI of the human inner ear at 1.5 T and 3.0 T. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 435
14. Gutberlet M, Spors B, Grothoff M et al. Comparison of different cardiac sequences at 1.5 and 3.0 T in respect of image quality, Signal- and contrast-to noise ratios: initial experience. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 441
15. Habermann C, Kramer MC, Graessner J et al. Fast and ultra fast MR-sialography: Comparison of 1.5 T and 3T. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 435
16. Hackenbroch M, Schmiedel A, Schmiedel B et al. MR imaging at 3.0 Tesla: In vitro evalution of magnetic attraction forces and heating of metallic implants. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 440
17. Henning J, Scheffler K. Hyperechoes. Magn Reson Med 2001; 46: 6-12
18. Hinton DP, Wald LL, Pitts J et al. Comparison of cardiac MRI on a 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla clinical whole body Systems. Invest Radiol 2003; 38 (7): 436-442
19. Hönig K, Kuhl CK, Scheef L. Functional 3.0-T MR assessment of higher cognitive function: Are there advantages over 1.5-T imaging? Radiology 2005; 234: 860-868
20. Hoogeveen RM, von Falkenhausen M, Gieseke J. Fast dynamic, high resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography with CENTRA keyhole and SENSE. Proceedings of the ISMRM 12th Scientific Meeting, Kyoto, Japan 15.-21. May 2000
21. Kämena AD, Beyersdorff D, Neumann L et al. Can MR imaging of the prostate at 3.0T with phased-array coil compete with a combined phased-array/endorectal coil approach at 1.5T. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 436
22. Kaul MG, Stork A, Bansmann PM et al. Evaluation of balanced steady-state free precession (TrueFISP) and K-space segmented gradient echo sequences for 3D coronary MR angiography with navigator gating at 3 Tesla. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 1560-1565
23. Krautmacher C. MR imaging of contrast enhancing brain tumors. Intraindividual comparison of Standard and half Standard clinical dose at 3 and 1.5 T. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2003; 175: 429
24. Krautmacher C, Träber F, Guer O et al. MRS relaxometry and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) at 3.0 Tesla in patients with idiopathic Parkinson disease. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 433
25. Krautmacher C, Willinek WA, Gieseke J et al. Full and half dose CE-MRI at 3T with intraindividual comparison to 1.5T imaging in patients with brain tumors Initial experience. Radiology (im Druck)
26. Kuhl C, Gieseke J, von Falkenhausen M et al. Diffusion imaging at 3.0 T with and without SENSE. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 430
27. Kuhl C, Gieseke J, von Falkenhausen M et al. Sensitivity Encoding (SENSE) for Diffusion Imaging at 3.OT. An intra- individual comparative study. Radiology 2005; 234: 517-526
28. Kuhl CK, Gieseke J, Morakkabati N et al. Contrast enhanced breast MRI at high magnetic fields (3.0 T); intraindividual study compared to 1.5 T. RSNA, 90th Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, 28.11.-3.12.2004, Chicago. 2004: 470-471
29. Kuhl C, Morakkabati N, Gieseke J et al. Breast MRI at Highfield. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 436
30. Kühl CK, Textor J, Gieseke J et al. Acute and subacute ischemic stroke at high-field-strength (3.0-T) diffusion-weighted MR imaging: intraindividual comparative study. Radiology 2005 Feb; 509-16. Epub 2004 Dec 15, DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2342031323
31. Lenk S, Schlemmer HP, Ludescher B et al. MR imaging of carpal ligaments and TECC with a dedicated surface coil: comparison of 3.0 and 1.5 Tesla field strength - first results. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 438
32. Lutterbey G, Gieseke J, von Falkenhausen M et al. Lung MRI at 3.0 T: a comparison of helical CT and high-field MRI in the detection of diffuse lung disease. European Radiology (im Druck)
33. Manka C, Block W, Träber F et al. Perfusion imaging at 3T. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2003; 175: 430
34. Manka C, Träber F, Gieseke J et al. Continuous arterial spin labelling (CASL) and dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging (DSC) at 3.0 T for cerebral perfusion analysis. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 432
35. Manka C, Träber F, Gieseke J et al. 3-dimensional dynamic susceptibility weighted perfusion MR imaging at 3T: Feasibility and contrast agent dose. Radiology 2005; 234: 869-877
36. Martirosian PG, Helms G, Klose U et al. Quantitative perfusion mapping of the kidneys using FAIR true-FISP imaging. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 437
37. Morakkabati N, Gieseke J, Kuhl CK et al. Highfield MRI of the female pelvis - first experiences. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 436
38. Niehues SM, Lemke AJ, Hengst S et al. Imaging the Meniere's disease on 3.0 T MRI. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 435
39. Scheef L, Neuloh G, Brockmöller T et al. 3T related problems regarding presurgical mapping of eloquent brain areas. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 431
40. Schlemmer HP, Ludescher B, Martirosian P et al. High resolution MRI of trabecular bone. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 438
41. Sicotte NL, Voskuhl RR, Bouvier S et al. Comparison of multiple sclerosis lesions at 1.5 and 3.0 T. Investigative Radiology 2003; 38: 423-427
42. Sommer T, Hackenbroch M, Hofer U et al. Coronary MRA at 3.0 Tesla compared to 1.5 Tesla: Initial results in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Radiology 2005; 234: 718-725
43. Sommer T, Maintz D, Schmiedel A et al. Hochfeld-Magnetresonanz- tomographie: Magnetische Anziehungs- und Rotationskräfte auf metallische Implantate bei 3,0 T. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 731-738
44. Sosna J, Rofsky NM, Gaston SM et al. Determinations of prostate volume at 3-Tesla using an external phased array coil: comparison to pathologic specimens. Acad Radiol 2003; 10: 846-853
45. Steidle G, Machann J, Schick F et al. Quantification of lipids in 1H MR spectra recorded at 3.0 T: Improvements in metabolic studies. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 433
46. Träber F, Block W, Gieseke J et al. Proton MR spectroscopy of the hippocampus at 3 T. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 434
47. Träber F, Block W, Lamerichs R et al. Measurement of 1H metabolite relaxation times at 3T. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2003; 175: 428
48. Träber F, Block W, Lamerichs R et al. 1H metabolite relaxation times at 3.0 tesla: Measurements of T1 and T2 values in normal brain and determination of regional differences in transverse relaxation. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 19: 537-545
49. Tschampa H, Willinek WA, Krautmacher C et al. Diagnosing hippocampal sclerosis at 3T: Initial Experiences. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2003; 175: 430
50. Willinek WA, Born M, Simon B et al. 3.0T time of flight MR angiography: Comparison with 1.5T. Initial experience. Radiology 2003; 229: 913-920
51. Willinek WA, Gieseke J, von Falkenhausen M et al. Sensitivity Encoding (SENSE) for high spatial resolution time-of-flight MR angiography of the intracranial arteries at 3.0T. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 21-26
52. Willinek WA, Gieseke J, von Falkenhausen M et al. Sensitivity Encoding for Fast MR Imaging of the Brain in Patients with Stroke. Radiology 2003; 228: 669-675
53. Willinek WA, Gieseke J, Born M et al. 3.0 T intracranial MR angiography at 1024 matrix using Sensitivity Encoding (SENSE). Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 431
54. Willinek WA, Gieseke J, Born M et al. 3T CE MRA of the supraaortic arteries: Does the signal gain at high field allow to replace the phased array coil by the quadrature body coil? Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 440