Complex genetic changes in strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae derived by selection in the laboratory

Genetics

Volumn 177, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 449-456

  Witten, Joshua T ^a   Chen, Christina T L ^a   Cohen, Barak A ^a,b  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Box 8510 ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; FUNGAL STRAIN; GENETIC SELECTION; MULTIGENE FAMILY; NONHUMAN; OXIDATIVE STRESS; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; DIRECTED MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; LABORATORIES; MUTATION; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; OXIDATIVE STRESS; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SELECTION (GENETICS); TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 35048879729     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: 00166731     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.077859     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. BERRIZ, G. F., O. D. KING, B. BRYANT, C. SANDER and F. P. ROTH, 2003 Characterizing gene sets with FuncAssociate. Bioinformatics 19: 2502-2504.
2. BREM, R. B., and L. KRUGLYAK, 2005 The landscape of genetic complexity across 5,700 gene expression traits in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 1572-1577.
3. BUCKLING, A., M. A. WILLS and N. COLEGRAVE, 2003 Adaptation limits diversification of experimental bacterial populations. Science 302: 2107-2109.
4. CAKAR, Z. P., U. O. SEKER, C. TAMERLER, M. SONDEREGGER and U. SAUER, 2005 Evolutionary engineering of multiple-stress resistant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 5: 569-578.
5. CARROLL, S. B., 2005 Evolution at two levels: on genes and form. PLoS Biol. 3: e245.
6. CASTLE, W. E., 1951 Variation in the hooded pattern of rats, and a new allele of Hooded. Genetics 36: 254-266.
7. COHAN, F. M., and A. A. HOFFMANN, 1986 Genetic divergence under uniform selection. II. Different responses to selection for knockdown resistance to ethanol among Drosophila melanogaster populations and their replicate lines. Genetics 114: 145-164.
8. COOPER, T. F., D. E. ROZEN and R. E. LENSKI, 2003 Parallel changes in gene expression after 20,000 generations of evolution in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 1072-1077.
9. CROZAT, E., N. PHILIPPE, R. E. LENSKI, J. GEISELMANN and D. SCHNEIDER, 2005 Long-term experimental evolution in Escherichia coli. XII. DNA topology as a key target of selection. Genetics 169: 523-532.
10. DE VISSER, J. A., and R. E. LENSKI, 2002 Long-term experimental evolution in Escherichia coli. XI. Rejection of non-transitive interactions as cause of declining rate of adaptation. BMC Evol. Biol. 2: 19.
11. DE VISSER, J. A., and D. E. ROZEN, 2006 Clonal interference and the periodic selection of new beneficial mutations in Escherichia coli. Genetics 172: 2093-2100.
12. DUNHAM, M. J., H. BADRANE, T. FEREA, J. ADAMS, P. O. BROWN et al., 2002 Characteristic genome rearrangements in experimental evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 16144-16149.
13. ELENA, S. F., and R. E. LENSKI, 2003 Evolution experiments with microorganisms: the dynamics and genetic bases of adaptation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 4: 457-469.
14. ESTES, S., P. C. PHILLIPS, D. R. DENVER, W. K. THOMAS and M. LYNCH, 2004 Mutation accumulation in populations of varying size: the distribution of mutational effects for fitness correlates in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 166: 1269-1279.
15. FELSENSTEIN, J., 1985 Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
16. FELSENSTEIN, J., 1989 PHYLIP - Phylogeny Inference Package (version 3.2). Cladistics 5: 164-166.
17. FELSENSTEIN, J., 2005 PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.66. Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle. (http://evolution.genetics.washington.edu/phylip.html).
18. FEREA, T. L., D. BOTSTEIN, P. O. BROWN and R. F. ROSENZWEIG, 1999 Systematic changes in gene expression patterns following adaptive evolution in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 9721-9726.
19. GASCH, A. P., P. T. SPELLMAN, C. M. KAO, O. CARMEL-HAREL, M. B. Eisen et al., 2000 Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol. Biol. Cell 11: 4241-4257.
20. GERKE, J. P., C. T. L. CHEN and B. A. COHEN, 2006 Natural isolates of Saccharomyces cerevisiae display complex genetic variation in sporulation efficiency. Genetics 174: 985-997.
21. GIAEVER, G., A. M. CHU, L. NI, C. CONNELLY, L. RILES et al., 2002 Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 418: 387-391.
22. GIETZ, R. D., and R. A. WOODS, 2002 Transformation of yeast by lithium acetate/single-stranded carrier DNA/polyethylene glycol method. Methods Enzymol. 350: 87-96.
23. GOLDSTEIN, A. L., and J. H. MCCUSKER, 1999 Three new dominant drug resistance cassettes for gene disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 15: 1541-1553.
24. GRIMBERG, B., and C. ZEYL, 2005 The effects of sex and mutation rate on adaptation in test tubes and to mouse hosts by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Evol. Int. J. Org. Evol. 59: 431-438.
25. HEGRENESS, M., N. SHORESH, D. HARTL and R. KISHONY, 2006 An equivalence principle for the incorporation of favorable mutations in asexual populations. Science 311: 1615-1617.
26. HERRING, C. D., A. RAGHUNATHAN, C. HONISCH, T. PATEL, M. K. APPLEBEE et al., 2006 Comparative genome sequencing of Escherichia coli allows observation of bacterial evolution on a laboratory timescale. Nat. Genet. 38: 1406-1412.
27. JAMIESON, D. J., 1998 Oxidative stress responses of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 14: 1511-1527.
28. KASSEN, R., and T. BATAILLON, 2006 Distribution of fitness effects among beneficial mutations before selection in experimental populations of bacteria. Nat. Genet. 38: 484-488.
29. LAURIE, C. C., S. D. CHASALOW, J. R. LEDEAUX, R. MCCARROLL, D. BUSH et al., 2004 The genetic architecture of response to long-term artificial selection for oil concentration in the maize kernel. Genetics 168: 2141-2155.
30. LENSKI, R. E., and M. TRAVISANO, 1994 Dynamics of adaptation and diversification: a 10,000-generation experiment with bacterial populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 6808-6814.
31. LYNCH, M., and B. WALSH, 1998 Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
32. MOORE, D. S., and G. P. MCCABE, 2006 Introduction to the Practice of Statistics. W. H. Freeman, New York.
33. OSTROWSKI, E. A., D. E. ROZEN and R. E. LENSKI, 2005 Pleiotropic effects of beneficial mutations in Escherichia coli. Evol. Int. J. Org. Evol. 59: 2343-2352.
34. PAQUIN, C., and J. ADAMS, 1983a Frequency of fixation of adaptive mutations is higher in evolving diploid than haploid yeast populations. Nature 302: 495-500.
35. PAQUIN, C. E., and J. ADAMS, 1983b Relative fitness can decrease in evolving asexual populations of S. cerevisiae. Nature 306: 368-370.
36. PELOSI, L., L. KUHN, D. GUETTA, J. GARIN, J. GEISELMANN et al., 2006 Parallel changes in global protein profiles during long-term experimental evolution in Escherichia coli. Genetics 173: 1851-1869.
37. RIEHLE, M. M., A. F. BENNETT, R. E. LENSKI and A. D. LONG, 2003 Evolutionary changes in heat-inducible gene expression in lines of Escherichia coli adapted to high temperature. Physiol. Genomics 14: 47-58.
38. RIFKIN, S. A., D. HOULE, J. KIM and K. P. WHITE, 2005 A mutation accumulation assay reveals a broad capacity for rapid evolution of gene expression. Nature 438: 220-223.
39. SILANDER, O. K., O. TENAILLON and L. CHAO, 2007 Understanding the evolutionary fate of finite populations: the dynamics of mutational effects. PLoS Biol. 5: 94.
40. WRAY, G. A., 2007 The evolutionary significance of cis-regulatory mutations. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8: 206-216.
41. ZEYL, C., 2000 Budding yeast as a model organism for population genetics. Yeast 16: 773-784.
42. ZEYL, C., M. MIZESKO and J. A. G. M. D. VISSER, 2001 Mutational meltdown in laboratory yeast populations. Evolution 55: 909-917.
43. ZEYL, C., T. VANDERFORD and M. CARTER, 2003 An evolutionary advantage of haploidy in large yeast populations. Science 299: 555-558.
44. ZEYL, C., C. CURTIN, K. KARNAP and E. BEAUCHAMP, 2005 Antagonism between sexual and natural selection in experimental populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Evol. Int. J. Org. Evol. 59: 2109-2115.