Impact of an english-as-a-second-language professional development program

Journal of Educational Research

Volumn 101, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 36-49

  Eun, Barohny ^a,b   Heining Boynton, Audrey L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Classroom practice; English as a second language teachers; Professional development programs; Years of teaching experience

Indexed keywords

EID: 35048855545     PISSN: 00220671     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/JOER.101.1.36-49     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ariza, E. N., Morales-Jones, C. A., Yahya, N., & Zainuddin, H. (2002). Why TESOL?: Theories and issues in teaching English as a second language for K-12 teachers (2nd ed.). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
2. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4. Bandura, A. (1991). Self-regulation of motivation through anticipatory and self-regulatory mechanisms. In R. A. Dienstbier (Ed.), Perspectives on motivation: Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 38, pp. 69-164). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
5. Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117-148.
6. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
7. Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33, 3-15.
8. Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). Doing what matters most: Investing in quality teaching. New York: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.
9. DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Elmore, R. F., & Burney, D. (1999). Investing in teacher learning: Staff development and instructional improvement. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 263-291). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
11. Frechtling, J. A., Sharp, L., Carey, N., & Baden-Kierman, N. (1995). Teacher enhancement programs: A perspective on the last four decades. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation Directorate for Educational and Human Resources.
12. Fullan, M. (1982). The meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
13. Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 569-582.
14. Goolsby, T. W. (1996). Time use in instrumental rehearsals: A comparison of experienced, novice, and student teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 44, 286-303.
15. Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5-12.
16. Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
17. Guskey, T. R., & Huberman, M. (1995). Introduction. In T. R. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices (pp. 1-6). New York: Teachers College Press.
18. Guskey, T. R., & Sparks, D. (1991). What to consider when evaluating staff development. Educational Leadership, 49(3), 73-76.
19. Howell, D. C. (2002). Statistical methods for psychology (5th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury.
20. Ingvarson, L., Meiers, M., & Beavis, A. (2005). Factors affecting the impact of professional development programs on teachers' knowledge, practice, student outcomes & efficacy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13 (10), 1-28.
21. Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1980). Improving inservice training: The messages of research. Educational Leadership, 37(5), 379-385.
22. Leonard, A. A., & Minogue, J. (2004). The effect teaching experience has on perceived effectiveness of interactive television as a distance education model for elementary school science teacher's professional development: Another digital divide? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13, 485-494.
23. Leyba, C. F. (1994). (Ed.). Schooling and language minority students: A theoretical framework (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: University of California, Evaluation, Dissemination, and Assessment Center.
24. Loucks, S. F., & Meile, M. (1982). Evaluation of staff development: How do you know it took? The Journal of Staff Development, 3, 102-117.
25. Mayer, D. (1999). Measuring instructional practice: Can policymakers trust survey data? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(1), 29-45.
26. McLaughlin, M. W. (1994). Strategic sites for teachers' professional development. In P. Grimmett & J. Neufeld (Eds.), Teacher development and the struggle for authenticity: Professional growth and restructuring in the context of change (pp. 31-51). New York: Teachers College Press.
27. Ross, J. A. (1998). Antecedents and consequences of teacher efficacy. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching: Expectations in the classroom (Vol. 7, pp. 49-73). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
28. Samway, K. D., & McKeon, D. ( 1999). Myths and realities: Best practices for language minority students. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
29. Scarcella, R. (1990). Teaching language minority students in the multicultural classroom. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
30. Smylie, M. A. (1988). The enhancement function of staff development: Organizational and psychological antecedents to individual teacher change. American Educational Research Journal, 25, 1-30.
31. Smylie, M. A., & Conyers, J. G. (1991). Changing conceptions of teaching influence the future of staff development. Journal of Staff Development, 12, 12-16.
32. Sparks, G. M. (1983). Synthesis of research on staff development for effective teaching. Educational Leadership, 41(3), 65-72.
33. Sykes, G. (1999). Introduction: Teaching as the learning profession. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. xv-xxiii). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
34. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
35. Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J., & Rasinski, K. (2000). The psychology of survey response. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
36. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805.
37. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2002, April). The influence of resources and support on teachers' efficacy beliefs. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
38. Woolfolk, A. E., & Hoy, W. K. ( 1990). Prospective teachers' sense of efficacy and beliefs about control. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 81-91.