Carbohydrate wheels: Cucurbituril-based carbohydrate clusters

Angewandte Chemie - International Edition

Volumn 46, Issue 39, 2007, Pages 7393-7395

  Kim, Jeeyeon ^a   Ahn, Youngjoo ^a   Park, Kyeng Min ^a   Kim, Youngkook ^a   Ko, Young Ho ^a   Oh, Dong Hyun ^a   Kim, Kimoon ^a  

^a Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Carbohydrates; Cluster compounds; Host guest systems; Multivalent interactions; Supramolecular chemistry

Indexed keywords

CLUSTER COMPOUNDS; HOST-GUEST SYSTEMS; MULTIVALENT INTERACTIONS;

BINDING ENERGY; CELLS; SUPRAMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY; SYNTHESIS (CHEMICAL);

CARBOHYDRATES;

CARBOHYDRATE; CUCURBITURIL; MACROCYCLIC COMPOUND; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; HUMAN; PHOTOMETRY; SYNTHESIS; TUMOR CELL LINE;

CARBOHYDRATES; CELL LINE, TUMOR; HUMANS; MACROCYCLIC COMPOUNDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; NEPHELOMETRY AND TURBIDIMETRY;

EID: 35048836191     PISSN: 14337851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/anie.200702540     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. A. Varki, Glycobiology 1993, 3, 97.
2. Y. C. Lee, R. T. Lee, Acc. Chem. Res. 1995, 28, 321.
3. a) J. J. Lundquist, E. J. Toone, Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 555;
4. b) T. K. Lindhorst, Top. Curr. Chem. 2002, 218, 201.
5. a) A. Spaltenstein, G. M. Whitesides, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 686;
6. b) K. H. Mortell, R. V. Weatherman, L. L. Kiessling, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 2297.
7. a) K. Aoi, K. Itoh, M. Okada, Macromolecules 1995, 28, 5391;
8. b) R. Roy, Polym. News 1996, 21, 226;
9. c) W. B. Turnbull, J. F. Stoddart, Rev. Mol. Biotechnol. 2002, 90, 231, and references therein.
10. Selected examples: a) A. Marra, M.-C. Scherrmann, A. Dondoni, A. Casnati, P. Minari, R. Ungaro, Angew. Chem. 1994, 106, 2533;
11. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 2479;
12. b) R. Roy, J. M. Kim, Angew. Chem. 1999, 111, 380;
13. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 369;
14. c) K. Fujimoto, T. Miyata, Y. Aoyama, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 3558.
15. a) D. A. Fulton, J. F. Stoddart, J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 8309;
16. b) C. Ortiz Mellet, J. Defaye, J. M. G. Fernández, Chem. Eur. J. 2002, 8, 1982, and references therein.
17. a) H. Otsuka, Y. Akiyama, Y. Nagasaki, K. Kataoka, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 8226;
18. b) J. M. de la Fuente, S. Penadés, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2006, 1760, 636.
19. a) J. E. Kingery-Wood, K. W. Williams, G. B. Sigal, G. M. Whitesides, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 7303;
20. b) H.-K. Lee, K. M. Park, Y. J. Jeon, D. Kim, D. H. Oh, H. S. Kim, C. K. Park, K. Kim, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 5006.
21. a) N. Kamiya, M. Tominaga, S. Sato, M. Fujita, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 3816;
22. b) J.-H. Ryu, E. Lee, Y.-b. Lim, M. Lee, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 4808.
23. Reviews on cucurbit[n]uril: a) W. L. Mock, Top. Curr. Chem. 1995, 175, 1;
24. b) J. W. Lee, S. Samal, N. Selvapalam, H.-J. Kim, K. Kim, Acc. Chem. Res. 2003, 36, 621;
25. c) J. Lagona, P. Mukhopadhyay, S. Chakrabarti, L. Isaacs, Angew. Chem. 2005, 117, 4922;
26. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4844.
27. S. Y. Jon, N. Selvapalam, D. H. Oh, J.-K. Kang, S.-Y. Kim, Y. J. Jeon, J. W. Lee, K. Kim, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 10186.
28. K. Kim, N. Selvapalam, Y. H. Ko, K. M. Park, D. Kim, J. Kim, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 267, and references therein.
29. P. L. Durette, T. Y. Shen, Carbohydr. Res. 1980, 81, 261.
30. Use of excess acetylthioglycosides 1-3 and a longer reaction time did not result in complete substitution of the carbohydrate units (n = 12) in 4-8, presumably because of steric crowding. Separation of the products with a different degree of carbohydrate substitution (n = 9-12) was practically impossible.
31. I. J. Goldstein, R. D. Poretz in The Lectins: Properties, Functions, and Applications in Biology and Medicine (Eds.: I. E. Liener, N. Sharon, I. J. Goldstein), Academic Press, Orlando, 1986.
32. [19] were carried out at pH 5.2 (sodium acetate buffer) following the well-established protocols in the literature; see the Supporting Information for details.
33. K. A. Connors, Binding Constants, Wiley, New York, 1987.
34. a) T. K. Dam, R. Roy, S. K. Das, S. Oscarson, C. F. Brewer, J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 14223;
35. b) J. B. Corbell, J. J. Lundquist, E. J. Toone, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2000, 11, 95.
36. [19a] which may differ from the structural valency. It can be determined from the n value that best fits the ITC data. The n value corresponds to the number of binding sites per ConA monomer, which is the inverse of the functional valency of a carbohydrate cluster to the lectin. An n value of 0.36 (see the Supporting Information) indicates that the binding stoichiometry between 9 and ConA monomer is approximately 1:3, which is consistent with that determined by the turbidimetric Job plot; therefore, 9 behaves predominantly as a trivalent ligand to the lectin.
37. [19a]
38. The binding enhancement corrected for the structural valency (the number of mannose units) of 9 is 2.3.