Technology-enhanced research: Educational ICT systems as research instruments

Technology, Pedagogy and Education

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 337-356

  Cox, Richard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34848826839     PISSN: 1475939X     EISSN: 17475139     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14759390701614470     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Anderson, J. R. (2002) Spanning seven orders of magnitude: A challenge for cognitive modelling. Cognitive Science, 26, pp. 85-112.
2. Anderson, J. R. and Gluck, K. (2001) What role do cognitive architectures play in intelligent tutoring systems?. Cognition & instruction: Twenty-five years of progress, pp. 227-262. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
3. Barwise, J. and Etchemendy, J. (1994) Hyperproof, Cambridge University Press, Stanford, CA
4. Beck, J. E., Arroyo, I., Woolf, B. P. and Beal, C. R. (1999) Artificial intelligence in education. proceedings of the 9th Artificial Intelligence in Education (AI-ED99) conference Le Mans IOS Press, pp. 181-188. IOS Press, Amsterdam
5. Blackwell, A., Jansen, A. and Marriott, K. (2000) Restricted focus viewer: A tool for tracking visual attention. Theory and application of diagrams, pp. 162-177. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
6. Brna, P. and Cox, R. (1998) Adding 'intelligence' to a learning environment: A case of learner-centred design?. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 14:4, pp. 268-277.
7. Chi, M. (1997) Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6:3, pp. 271-315.
8. Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E. and Ecclestone, K. (2004) Learning styles and pedagogy post-16 learning. A systematic and critical review, Learning and Skills Research Centre, Learning and Skills Development Agency, London
9. Cox, R. (1997) Artificial intelligence in education: Knowledge and media in learning systems. proceedings of the 8th World Conference of the Artificial Intelligence in Education Society, Kobe, Japan IOS, pp. 434-441. IOS, Amsterdam
10. Cox, R. (1999) Representation construction, externalised cognition and individual differences. Learning and Instruction, 9, pp. 343-363.
11. Cox, R. (2005) Vicarious learning and case-based teaching of clinical reasoning skills Pedagogy paper: Technology, Learning Relationships & Networks Seminar. Contexts, Communities, Networks: Mobilising Learners' Resources and Relationships in Different Domains, TLRP & Centre for Research in Lifelong Learning, Open University, Milton Keynes
12. Cox, R. and Brna, P. (1995) Supporting the use of external representations in problem solving: The need for flexible learning environments. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 6:2, pp. 239-302.
13. Cox, R. and Lum, C. (2004) Case-based teaching & clinical reasoning: seeing how students think with PATSy. Innovations in professional education for speech and language therapists, pp. 169-196. Whurr, London
14. Cox, R., Stenning, K. and Oberlander, J. (1994) Graphical effects in learning logic: Reasoning, representation and individual differences. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society Mahwah, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 237-242. Lawrence Erlbaum
15. Cox, R., Stenning, K. and Oberlander, J. (1995) The effect of graphical and sentential logic teaching on spontaneous external representation. Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, 2:4, pp. 56-75.
16. Hoben, K. and Morris, J. (2005) PATSy: Innovations in learning for speech and language therapy. Bulletin of the Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists
17. Hoben, K., Varley, R. and Cox, R. (2007) The clinical reasoning skills of speech & language therapy students. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 42:1, pp. 123-135.
18. Howarth, B., Hoben, K., Morris, J., Varley, R., Lee, J. and Cox, R. (2005) Investigating speech therapists' clinical reasoning: Analysing think-aloud protocols and integrating multiple-source data. Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research in Learning & Instruction (EARLI) Nicosia
19. Irby, D. M. (1994) Three exemplary models of case-based teaching. Academic Medicine, 69, pp. 947-953.
20. Jansen, A. R., Blackwell, A. F. and Marriott, K. (2003) A tool for tracking visual attention: The restricted focus viewer. Behavior Research Methods, 35:1, pp. 57-69.
21. Jonassen, D. H. (1996) Scaffolding diagnostic reasoning in case-based learning environments. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 8:1, pp. 48-68.
22. Jonassen, D. H. and Grabowski, B. L. (1993) Handbook of individual differences, learning and instruction, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
23. Kent, P., Bakker, A., Hoyles, C. and Noss, R. (2005) Techno-mathematical literacies in the workplace. Mathematics, Statistics and OR Connections, 5:1, pp. 1-3.
24. Klahr, D. (2000) Exploring science: The cognition and development of discovery processes, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
25. Kozhevnikov, M., Hegerty, M. and Mayer, R. E. (2002) Revising the visualizer-verbalizer dimension: Evidence for two types of visualizer. Cognition and Instruction, 20:1, pp. 47-77.
26. Kukreja, U., Stevenson, W. E. and Ritter, F. E. (2006) RUI-recording user input from interfaces under Windows and Mac OS X. Behavior Research Methods, 38:4, pp. 656-659.
27. Laurillard, D. (2001) Rethinking university teaching: A framework for the effective use of educational technology, Routledge, London
28. Lee, J. (2005) Vicarious learning. Encyclopedia of distance learning, Idea Group, Hershey, PA
29. Matsuno, T. (1987) Cognitive style and representational strategies in categorical syllogistic reasoning. Tohoku Psychologica Folia, 46:1, pp. 97-102.
30. Mayer, R. E. and Sims, V. K. (1994) For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, pp. 389-401.
31. Mayes, J. T., Dineen, F., McKendree, J. and Lee, J. (2001) Learning from watching others. Networked learning: Perspectives and issues, pp. 213-227. Springer, London
32. Oberlander, J., Cox, R. and Stenning, K. (1995) Proofs as discourse: An empirical study. Working Notes of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence Spring Symposium on Empirical Methods in Discourse Interpretation & Generation, Stanford, CA
33. Oberlander, J., Monaghan, P., Cox, R., Stenning, K. and Tobin, R. (1999) Unnatural language processing: An empirical study of students' multimodal proof styles. Journal of Logic, Language & Information, 8, pp. 363-384.
34. Oberlander, J., Stenning, K. and Cox, R. (1999) Hyperproof: Abstraction, visual preference and modality. Language, logic and computation: Volume 2, pp. 222-236. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA
35. Romero, P., Cox, R., Boulay, B. du, Lutz, R. and Bryant, S. (2007) A methodology for the capture and analysis of hybrid data. Behavior Research Methods, 29:2, pp. 309-317.
36. Romero, P., Boulay, B. du, Cox, R., Lutz, R. and Bryant, S. Debugging strategies and tactics in a multi-representation software environment. International Journal of Human-Computer Systems
37. Schmitz, B. (2006) Advantages of studying process in educational research. Learning & Instruction, 16, pp. 433-449.
38. Skehan, P. (1988) A cognitive approach to language learning, Oxford University Press, Oxford
39. Stenning, K., Cox, R. and Oberlander, J. (1995) Contrasting the cognitive effects of graphical and sentential logic teaching: Reasoning, representation and individual differences. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10:34, pp. 333-354.
40. Taraban, R., Rynearson, K. and Stalcup, K. A. (2001) Time as a variable in learning on the world-wide web. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 33:2, pp. 217-225.
41. Taylor, K. L. and Dionne, J. -P. (2000) Accessing problem-solving strategy knowledge: The complementary use of concurrent verbal protocols and retrospective debriefing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92:3, pp. 413-425.
42. Westerman, S. J., Hambly, S. and Alder, C. (1996) Investigating the human-computer interface using the Datalogger. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 28:4, pp. 603-606.
43. Whitworth, A., Franklin, S. and Dodd, B. (2004) Case based problem solving for speech and language therapy students. Innovations in professional education for speech and language therapists, pp. 29-50. Whurr, London
44. Williams, S. M. (1993) Putting case-based learning into context: examples from legal, business and medical education. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, pp. 367-427.