Let's you do that: Sharing the cognitive burdens of dialogue

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 57, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 616-641

  Bard, E G ^a   Anderson, A H ^b   Chen, Y ^a   Nicholson, H B M ^a   Havard, C ^b   Dalzel Job, S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Audience design; Cognitive load; Common ground; Dialogue; Least collaborative effort; Shared responsibility; Simulated gaze

Indexed keywords

EID: 34748843384     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.12.003     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Al-Raheb, Y. (2006). DRT representation of degrees of belief. Paper presented at the 7th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, Sydney.
2. Anderson A.H., Bader M., Bard E.G., Boyle E., Doherty G., Garrod S., et al. The H.C.R.C. map task corpus. Language and Speech 34 (1991) 351-366
3. Anderson, A. H., Bard, E. G., Havard, C., Dalzel-Job, S., Kenicer, D., & McIntyre, A. (submitted for publication). Look at me when I am listening to you: the impact of feedback in a simulation of virtual team working.
4. Anderson A.H., Bard E.G., Sotillo C., Newlands A., and Doherty-Sneddon G. Limited visual control of the intelligibility of speech in face-to-face dialogue. Perception & Psychophysics 59 4 (1997) 580-592
5. Anderson A.H., and Boyle E. Forms of introduction in dialogues: their discourse contexts and communicative consequences. Language and Cognitive Processes 9 (1994) 101-122
6. Argyle M., and Cook M. Gaze and mutual gaze (1976), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
7. Bakeman R., and McArthur D. Picturing repeated measures: comments on Loftus, Morrison, and others. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 28 4 (1996) 584-589
8. Bard E.G., Anderson A.H., Sotillo C., Aylett M., Doherty-Sneddon G., and Newlands A. Controlling the intelligibility of referring expressions in dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language 42 (2000) 1-22
9. Bard E.G., and Aylett M.P. Referential form, word duration, and modeling the listener in spoken dialogue. In: Trueswell J.C., and Tanenhaus M.K. (Eds). Approaches to studying world-situated language use: Bridging the language-as-product and language-as-action traditions (2004), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 173-191
10. Barras C., Geffrois E., Wu Z., and Liberman M. Transcriber: development and use of a tool for assisting speech corpora production. Speech Communication 33 1-2 (2001) 5-22
11. Bock K., Irwin D., and Davidson D. Putting first things first. In: Henderson J.M., and Ferreira F. (Eds). The interface of language, vision, and action: Eye movements and the visual world (2004), Psychology Press, New York 249-278
12. Brennan S.E., and Clark H.H. Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 11 (1996) 1482-1493
13. Brennan, S. E., Dickinson, C., Chen, X., Neider, M., & Zelinsky, G. (2005). When eyegaze speaks louder than words: Advantages of shared gaze for coordinating a collaborative search task. Paper presented at the Psychonomic Society, 46th Annual Meeting, Toronto, Canada.
14. Brown, G., Anderson, A. H., Yule, G., & Shillcock, R. (1984). Teaching talk. Cambridge: CUP.
15. Brown P., and Dell G. Adapting production to comprehension-the explicit mention of instruments. Cognitive Psychology 19 (1987) 441-472
16. Bull, M. (1998). Inter-turn intervals in spontaneous speech. Unpublished PhD, U. of Edinburgh, U.K.
17. Carletta J., Isard A., Isard S., Kowtko J., Newlands A., Doherty-Sneddon G., et al. The reliability of a dialogue coding scheme. Computational Linguistics 23 (1997) 13-31
18. Carletta J., and Mellish C. Risk-taking and recovery in task-oriented dialogue. Journal of Pragmatics 26 (1996) 71-107
19. Clark H.H. Using language (1996), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
20. Clark H.H., and Carlson T.B. Hearers and speech acts. Language 58 (1982) 332-373
21. Clark H.H., and Krych M.A. Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding. Journal of Memory and Language 50 (2004) 62-68
22. Clark H.H., and Marshall C.R. Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In: Joshi A.K., Webber B., and Sag I. (Eds). Elements of discourse understanding (1981), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 111-222
23. Clark H.H., and Schaefer E. Collaborating on contributions to conversations. Language and Cognitive Processes 2 (1987) 19-41
24. Clark H.H., and Schaefer E. Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science 13 (1989) 229-259
25. Clark H.H., Schreuder R., and Buttrick S. Common ground and the understanding of demonstrative reference. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 22 (1983) 245-258
26. Clark H.H., and Wilkes-Gibbs D. Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition 22 (1986) 1-39
27. Dell G., and Brown P. Mechanisms for listener-adaptation in language production: Limiting the role of the model of the listener. I. In: Napoli D., and Kegl J. (Eds). Bridges between psychology and linguistics: A Swarthmore Festschrift for Lila Gleitman (1991), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 111-222
28. Doherty-Sneddon G., Anderson A.H., O'Malley C., Langton S., Garrod S., and Bruce V. Face-to-face interaction and video mediated communication: a comparison of dialogue structure and co-operative task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 3 2 (1997) 105-125
29. Ferreira V., and Dell G. Effect of ambiguity and lexical availability on syntactic and lexical production. Cognitive Psychology 40 (2000) 296-340
30. Gale C., and Monk A. Where am I looking? The accuracy of video-mediated gaze awareness. Perception & Psychophysics 62 (2000) 586-595
31. Griffin Z.M. Why look? Reasons for eye movemonts related to language production. In: Henderson J.M., and Ferreira F. (Eds). The integration of language, vision, and action: Eye movements and the visual world (2004), Psychology Press, New York
32. Grosz B.J., and Sidner C. Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics 12 (1986) 175-204
33. Hanna, J., & Brennan, S. E. (submitted for publication). Speakers' eye gaze disambiguates referring expressions early during face-to-face conversation.
34. Hanna J., Tanenhaus M.K., and Trueswell J.C. The effects of common ground and perspective on domains of referential interpretation. Journal of Memory and Language 49 (2003) 43-61
35. Hobbs J.R., Stickel M., Appelt D., and Martin P. Interpretation as abduction. Artificial Intelligence 63 1-2 (1993) 69-142
36. Horton W.S., and Gerrig R.J. Conversational common ground and memory processes in language production. Discourse Processes 40 1 (2005) 1-35
37. Horton W.S., and Gerrig R.J. The impact of memory demands on audience design during language production. Cognition 96 2 (2005) 127-142
38. Horton W.S., and Keysar B. When do speakers take into account common ground?. Cognition 59 (1996) 91-117
39. Howell D.C. Statistical models for psychology. fifth ed. (2002), Duxbury, Thomson Learning, Pacific Grove, CA
40. Keysar B., Barr D., Balin J., and Paek T. Definite reference and mutual knowledge: Process models of common ground in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 39 (1998) 1-20
41. Keysar B., Lin S., and Barr D.J. Limits on theory of mind use in adults. Cognition 89 (2003) 25-41
42. Kibble R. Reasoning about propositional commitments in dialogue. Research on Language and Computation 4 2-3 (2006) 179-202
43. Lobmaier J.S., Fischer M.H., and Schwaninger A. Objects capture perceived gaze direction. Experimental Psychology 53 2 (2006) 117-122
44. Lochbaum K. A collaborative planning model of intentional structure. Computational Linguistics 24 4 (1998) 525-572
45. Lochbaum K., Grosz B.J., and Sidner C. Discourse structure and intention recognition. In: Dale R., Moisl H., and Somers H. (Eds). Handbook of natural language processing (2000), Marcel Dekker, New York 123-146
46. Lockridge C., and Brennan S.E. Addressees' needs influence speakers' early syntactic choices. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9 3 (2002) 550-557
47. Masson M., and Loftus G. Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 57 3 (2003) 203-220
48. Metzing C., and Brennan S.E. When conceptual pacts are broken: Partner-specific effects in the comprehension of referring expressions. Journal of Memory and Language 49 (2003) 201-213
49. Meyer A.S., van der Meulen F., and Brooks A. Eye movements during speech planning: Speaking about present and remembered objects. Visual Cognition 11 (2004) 553-576
50. Miles M., and Huberman A. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book. 2nd ed. (1994), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
51. Moll H., Koring C., Carpenter M., and Tomasello M. Infants determine others' focus of attention by pragmatics and exclusion. Journal of Cognition and Development 7 3 (2006) 411-430
52. Monk A., and Gale C. A look is worth a thousand words: Full gaze awareness in video-mediated conversation. Discourse Processes 33 (2002) 257-278
53. Phillips A.T., and Wellman H.M. Infants' understanding of object-directed action. Cognition 98 2 (2005) 137-155
54. Phillips A.T., Wellman H.M., and Spelke E.S. Infants' ability to connect gaze and emotional expression to intentional action. Cognition 85 1 (2002) 53-78
55. Pickering M., and Garrod S. Towards a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2004) 169-190
56. Poesio M., and Traum D. Conversational actions and discourse situations. Computational Intelligence 13 (1997) 309-347
57. Stein, R., & Brennan, S. E. (2004). Another person's eye gaze as a cue in solving programming problems.
58. Symons L.A., Lee K., Cedrone C., and Nishimura M. What are you looking at? Acuity for triadic eye gaze. Journal of General Psychology 131 4 (2004) 451-469
59. Todorovic D. Geometrical basis of perception of gaze direction. Vision Research 46 21 (2006) 3549-3562
60. Velichkovsky B.M. Communicating attention: Gaze position transfer in cooperative problem solving. Pragmatics and Cognition 3 2 (1995) 199-222