Limited visual control of the intelligibility of speech in face-to-face dialogue

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 59, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 580-592

  Anderson, A H ^a   Bard, E G ^b   Sotillo, C ^b   Newlands, A ^a   Doherty Sneddon, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LIP READING; MALE; SOUND DETECTION; SPEECH; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY;

ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIPREADING; MALE; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT;

EID: 0031135285     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03211866     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. ABELE, A. (1986). Functions of gaze in social interaction. Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour, 10, 83-101.
2. ANDERSON, A. H., BADER, M., BARD, E. G., BOYLE, E., DOHERTY, G., GARROD, S., ISARD, S., KOWTKO, J., MCALLISTER, J., MILLER, J., SOTILLO, C., THOMPSON, H. S., & WEINERT, R. (1991). The HCRC Map Task Corpus. Language & Speech, 34, 351-366.
3. ARGYLE, M. (1990). Bodily communication. London: Routledge.
4. ARGYLE, M., ALKEMA, F., & GILMOLR, R. (1972). The communication of friendly and hostile attitudes by verbal and non-verbal signals. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 385-402.
5. ARGYLE, M., & DEAN, J. (1965). Eye-contact, distance and affiliation. Sociometry, 28, 289-304.
6. ARGYLE, M., & GRAHAM, J. A. (1977). The Central Europe experiment: Looking at persons and looking at things. Journal of Environmental Psychology & Nonverbal Behaviour, 1, 6-16.
7. ARGYLE, M., & INGHAM, R. (1972). Gaze, mutual gaze and proximity. Semiotica, 6, 32-49.
8. ARIEL, M. (1990). Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. London: Routledge/Croom Helm.
9. BARD, E. G., & ANDERSON, A. H. (1983). The unintelligibility of speech to children. Journal of Child Language, 10, 265-292.
10. BARD, E. G., & ANDERSON, A. H. (1994). The unintelligibility of speech to children: Effects of referent availability. Journal of Child Language, 21, 623-648.
11. BARD, E. G., LOWE, A., & ALTMANN, G. (1989). The effects of repetition on words in recorded dictations. Proceedings of EUROSPEECH 89, 2, 573-576.
12. BARD, E. G., SOTILLO, C., ANDERSON, A. H., DOHERTY-SNEDDON, G., & NEWLANDS, A. (1995). The control of intelligibility in running speech. Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 4, 188-191.
13. BEATTIE, G. W. (1978). Sequential patterns of speech and gaze in dialogue. Semiotica, 23, 29-52.
14. BEATTIE, G. W. (1980). The role of language production processes in the organization of behaviour in face-to-face interaction. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production: Vol. 1. Speech and talk (pp. 69-107). London: Academic Press.
15. BEATTIE, G. W. (1981). A further investigation of the cognitive interference hypothesis of gaze patterns in conversation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 243-248.
16. BEATTIE, G. (1983). Talk: An analysis of speech and non-verbal behaviour in conversation. Milton Keynes, U.K.: Open University Press.
17. BOLINGER, D. (1963). Length, vowel, juncture. Linguistics, 1, 5-29.
18. BOLINGER, D. (1981). Two kinds of vowels, two kinds of rhythm. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
19. BOYLE, E. A., ANDERSON, A. H., & NEWLANDS, A. (1994). The effects of visibility on dialogue performance in a cooperative problem solving task. Language & Speech, 37, 1-20.
20. BROWN, G., ANDERSON, A. H., SHILLCOCK, R., & YULE, G. (1984). Teaching talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. CHAFE, W. (1974). Language and consciousness. Language, 50, 111-133.
22. DOHERTY-SNEDDON, G., ANDERSON, A. H., O'MALLEY, C., LANGTON, S., GARROD, S., & BRUCE, V. (in press). Face-to-face interaction and video mediated communication: A comparison of dialogue structure and co-operative task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied.
23. DUNCAN, S., & FISKE, D. W. (1977). Face-to-face interaction: Research methods and theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. ELLYSON, S. L., DOVIDO, J. F., & CORSON, R. L. (1981). Visual behaviour differences in females as a function of self-perceived expertise. Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour, 5, 164-171.
25. ERBER, N. P. (1974). Angle, distance and illumination on normal reception of speech. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 17, 99-112.
26. EXLINE, R. V. (1972). Visual interaction: The glance of power and preference. In J. K. Cole (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1971 (pp. 163-206). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
27. EXLINE, R. V., JONES, P., & MACIOROWSKI, K. (1977). Race, affiliation-conflict theory and mutual visual attention during conversation. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association.
28. EXLINE, R. V., & WINTERS, L. C. (1965). Affective relations and mutual glances in dyads. In S. Tomkins & C. Izaed (Eds.), Affect, cognition and personality (pp. 319-350). New York: Springer-Verlag.
29. FISHER, C., & TOKURA, H. (1995). The given-new contract in speech to infants. Journal of Memory & Language, 34, 287-310.
30. FOWLER, C. (1988). Differential shortening of repeated content words produced in various communicative contexts. Language & Speech, 28, 47-56.
31. FOWLER, C., & HOUSUM, J. (1987). Talkers' signalling of 'new' and 'old' words in speech and listeners' perception and use of the distinction. Journal of Memory & Language, 26, 489-504.
32. FOWLER, C.,& LEVY, E. (1991). Some ways in which forms arise from functions in linguistic communications. Proceedings of the XIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1, 279-282.
33. GAILEY, L. (1987). Psychological parameters of lip-reading skill. In B. Dodd & R. Campbell (Eds.), Hearing by eye: The psychology of lip-reading (pp. 115-142). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. GOLDMAN-EISLER, F. (1967). Sequential temporal patterns and cognitive processes in speech. Language & Speech, 10, 122-132.
35. GOODWIN, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.
36. GRICE, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 41-58). New-York: Academic Press.
37. HAWKINS, S., & WARREN, P. (1994). Phonetic influences on the intelligibility of conversational speech. Journal of Phonetics, 22, 493-511.
38. HUNNICUTT, S. (1985). Intelligibility vs. redundancy - conditions of dependency. Language & Speech, 28, 47-56.
39. ISAACS, E., & CLARK, H. H. (1987). References in conversation between experts and novices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 26-37.
40. KENDON, A. (1967). Some functions of gaze direction in social interaction. Acta Psychologica, 26, 22-63.
41. KOOPMANS-VAN BEINUM, F. J. (1980). Vowel contrast reduction: An acoustic and perceptual study of Dutch vowels in various speech conditions. Amsterdam: Academische Pers B. V.
42. KRANTZ, M., GEORGE, S. W., & HURSH, K. (1983). Gaze and mutual gaze of pre-school children in conversation. Journal of Psychology, 113, 9-15.
43. LIEBERMAN, P. (1963). Some effects of the semantic and grammatical context on the production and perception of speech. Language & Speech, 6, 172-175.
44. LINDBLOM, B. (1990). Explaining variation: A sketch of the H and H theory. In W. Hardcastle & A. Marchai (Eds.), Speech production and speech modelling (pp. 403-439). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
45. MASSARO, D. W. (1989). Multiple book review of Speech perception by ear and eye: A paradigm for psychological inquiry. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 12, 741-794.
46. MASSARO, D. W., & COHEN, M. M. (1983). Evaluation and integration of visual and auditory information in speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 9, 753-771.
47. MCALLISTER, J., POTTS, A., MASON, K., & MARCHANT, G. (1994). Word duration in monologue and dialogue speech. Language & Speech, 37, 393-406.
48. MCGURK, H., & MACDONALD, J. W. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746-748.
49. MEHRIBIAN, A. (1972). Nonverbal communication. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
50. MEHTA, G., & CUTLER, A. (1988). Detection of target phonemes in spontaneous and read speech. Language & Speech, 31, 135-156.
51. MILLER, G. A., HEISE, G. A., & LICHTEN, W. (1951). The intelligibility of speech as a function of the context of the test materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 338-352.
52. MOGFORD, K. (1987). Lip-reading in the prelingually deaf. In B. Dodd & R. Campbell (Eds.), Hearing by eye: The psychology of lip-reading (pp. 191-212). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
53. NIELSON, G. (1962). Studies in self-confrontation. Copenhagen: Monksgaard.
54. O'MALLEY, C., & LANGTON, S. (1994). Making the case for face-to-face interaction: Empirical studies of video-mediated communication. In S. Emott & D. Travis (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on POTS to PANS: User Issues in the Multimedia Revolution from Plain Old Telephones Services to Pictures and Network Services. Suffolk, U.K.: British Telecom.
55. O'SULLIVAN, M., EKMAN, P., FRIESEN, W., & SCHERER, K. (1985). What you say and how you say it: The contribution of speech content and voice quality to judgment of others. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 48, 54-62.
56. POLLACK, I., & PICKETT, J. (1963). The intelligibility of excerpts from conversation. Language & Speech, 6, 165-171.
57. PRINCE, E. (1981). Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp. 223-255). New York: Academic Press.
58. REISBERG, D., MCLEAN, J., & GOLDFIELD, A. (1987). Easy to hear but hard to understand: A lip-reading advantage with intact auditory stimuli. In B. Dodd & R. Campbell (Eds.), Hearing by eye: The psychology of lip-reading (pp. 97-114). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
59. SCHOBER, M., & CLARK, H. H. (1989). Understanding by addressees and overhearers. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 211-232.
60. SUMBY, W. H., & POLLACK, I. (1954). Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 26, 212-215.
61. SUMMERFIELD, A. Q. (1987). Some preliminaries to a comprehensive account of audio-visual speech perception. In B. Dodd & R. Campbell (Eds.), Hearing by eye: The psychology of lip-reading (pp. 3-52). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
62. TERKEN, J., & NOOTEBOOM, S. (1987). Opposite effects of accentuation and deaccentuation on verification latencies for Given and New information. Language & Cognitive Processes, 2, 145-163.
63. WALDEN, B. E., PROSEK, R. A., & WORTHINGTON, D. W. (1975). Auditory and audiovisual feature transmission in hearing-impaired adults. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 18, 272-280.
64. WALKER, M. B. (1977). The relative importance of verbal and non-verbal cues in the expression of confidence. Australian Journal of Psychology, 29, 45-57.
65. WALKER, M. B., & TRIMBOLI, C. (1983). The expressive function of the eye flash. Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour, 8, 3-13.
66. WILKES-GIBBS, D., & CLARK, H. H. (1992). Coordinating beliefs in conversation. Journal of Memory & Language, 31, 183-194.