Neurosphere-derived neural cells show region-specific behaviour in vitro

NeuroReport

Volumn 18, Issue 15, 2007, Pages 1539-1542

  Armando, Sylvain ^a   Lebrun, Aurore ^a   Hugnot, Jean Philippe ^a   Ripoll, Chantal ^a   Saunier, Monique ^a   Simonneau, Lionel ^a  

^a HÔPITAL SAINT ELOI   (France)

Author keywords

Differentiation; Neural stem progenitor cells; Neurospheres; Regional identity

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; ASTROCYTE; BRAIN CELL; BRAIN CORTEX; CELL ACTIVITY; CELL CULTURE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; CLONAL ANERGY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORPUS STRIATUM; EMBRYO CELL; IN VITRO STUDY; MOUSE; NERVE CELL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPINAL CORD;

ANIMALS; ASTROCYTES; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELLS, CULTURED; CEREBRAL CORTEX; CLONE CELLS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; FEMALE; FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY TECHNIQUE; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; NEOSTRIATUM; NERVE FIBERS; NEURONS; PREGNANCY; SPINAL CORD;

EID: 34748840860     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282f03d54     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Reynolds BA, Weiss S. Clonal and population analyses demonstrate that an EGF- responsive mammalian embryonic CNS precursor is a stem cell. Dev Biol 1996; 175:1-13.
2. Price J, Williams BP. Neural stem cells. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2001; 11: 564-567.
3. Lindvall O, Björklund A. Cell therapy in Parkinson's disease. NeuroRx 2004; 1:382-393.
4. Hitoshi S, Tropepe V, Ekker M, van der Kooy D. Neural stem cell lineage are regionally specified, but not committed, within distinct compartments of the developing brain. Development 2002; 129:233-244.
5. Parmar M, Skogh C, Björklund A, Campbell K. Regional specification of neurospheres cultures derived from subregions of the embryonic telencephalon. Mol Cell Neurosci 2002; 21:645-656.
6. Kim HT, Kim IS, Lee IS, Lee JP, Snyder E, In Park K. Human neurospheres derived from the fetal central nervous sytem are regionally and temporally specified but are not committed. Experimental Neurol 2006; 199:222-235.
7. Gabay L, Lowell S, Rubin LL, Anderson DJ. Deregulation of dorsoventral patterning by FGF confers trilineage differentiation capacity on CNS stem cells in vitro. Neuron 2003; 40:485-499.
8. Santa-Olalla J, Baizabal JM, Fregoso M, Càrdenas M, Covarrubias L. The in vivo positional identity gene expression code is not preserved in neural stem cells grown in culture. Eur J Neurosci 2003; 18: 1073-1084.
9. Machon O, Backman M, Krauss S, Kozmik Z. The cellular fate of cortical progenitors is not maintained in neurospheres cultures. Mol Cell Neurosci 2005; 30:388-397.
10. Jensen JB, Parmar M. Strengths and limitations of the neurospheres culture system. Mol Neurobiol 2006; 34:153-161.
11. Walder S, Ferretti P. Distinct neural precursors in the developing human spinal cord. Int J Dev Biol 2004; 48:671-674.
12. Tropepe V, Sibilia M, Ciruna BG, Rossant J, Wagner EF, van der Kooy D. Distinct neural stem cells proliferate in response to EGF and FGF in the developing mouse telencephalon. Dev Biol 1999; 208:166-188.
13. Allen ND. Temporal and epigenetic regulation of neurodevelopmental plasticity. Phil Trans R Soc B doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.2010.
14. Hsieh J, Gage FH. Epigenetic control of neural stem cell fate. Curr Opin Geneti Dev 2004; 14:461-469.
15. Tamamaki N, Fujimori K, Takauji R. Origin and route of tangentially migrating neurons in the developing neocortical intermediate zone. J Neurosci 1997; 17:8313-8323.
16. Anderson SA, Eisenstat DD, Shi L, Rubenstein LR. Interneuron migration from basal forebrain to neocortex: dependence on Dlx genes. Science 1997; 278:474-476.