Two-piece implants with turned versus microtextured collars

Journal of Periodontology

Volumn 78, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 1657-1663

  Cosyn, Jan ^a,b,c   Sabzevar, Mehran Moradi ^a,b   De Wilden, Peter ^b   De Rouck, Tim ^a  

^a VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

^b University of Brussels ^*

^c FREE UNIVERSITY OF BRUSSELS   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Dental implants; Implant collar; Surface roughness

Indexed keywords

EID: 34748812495     PISSN: 00223492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2007.070065     Document Type: Review

References (57)

1. Brånemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl 1977;16:1-132.
2. Park JY, Davies JE. Red blood cell and platelet interactions with titanium implant surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:530-539.
3. Park JY, Gemmell CH, Davies JE. Platelet interactions with titanium: Modulation of platelet activity by surface topography. Biomaterials 2001;22:2671-2682.
4. Davies JE. Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing. J Dent Educ 2003;67:932-949.
5. Ericsson I, Johansson CB, Bystedt H, Norton MR. A histomorphometric evaluation of bone-to-implant contact on machine-prepared and roughened titanium dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5:202-206.
6. 2-blasted titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:77-84.
7. Weng D, Hoffmeyer M, Hurzeler MB, Richter EJ. Osseotite vs. machined surface in poor bone quality. A study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14:703-708.
8. das Neves FD. Fones D, Bernardes SR, do Prado CJ, Neto AJ. Short implants - An analysis of longitudinal studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:86-93.
9. Romeo E, Lops D, Amorfini L, Chiapasco M, Ghisolfi M, Vogel G. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of small-diameter (3.3-mm) implants followed for 1-7 years: A longitudinal study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:139-148.
10. Schnitman PA, Wöhrle PS, Rubenstein JE, DaSilva JD, Wang NH. Ten-year results for Bra&ringnemark implants immediately loaded with fixed prostheses at implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12: 495-503.
11. Randow K, Ericsson I, Nilner K, Petersson A, Glantz PO. Immediate functional loading of Brånemark dental implants. An 18-month clinical follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10:8-15.
12. Degidi M, Piattelli A, Felice P, Carinci F. Immediate functional loading of edentulous maxilla: A 5-year retrospective study of 388 titanium implants. J Periodontol 2005;76:1016-1024.
13. lbanez JC, Tahhan MJ, Zamar JA, et al. Immediate occlusal loading of double acid-etched surface titanium implants in 41 consecutive full-arch cases in the mandible and maxilla: 6- to 74-month results. J Periodontol 2005;76:1972-1981.
14. Wennerberg A. On surface roughness and implant incorporation. [Thesis], Göteborg, Sweden: Göteborg university; 1996.
15. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Lindhe J. Surface topography of titanium implants. In: Lindhe J, Karring T, Lang NP, eds. Clinical Periodontology and Implant Dentistry. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell Munksgaard; 2003: 823-828.
16. Berglundh T, Lindhe J, Ericsson 1, Marinello CP, Liljenberg B, Thomsen P. The soft tissue barrier at implants and teeth. Clin Oral Implants Res 1991;2: 81-90.
17. Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Dimension of the peri-implant mucosa. Biologic width revisited. J Clin Periodontol 1996;23:971-973.
18. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Wennström J, Lindhe J. The peri-implant hard and soft tissue characteristics at different implant systems. A comparative study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:212-220.
19. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Moon IS, Lindhe J. Peri-implant tissues at submerged and non-submerged titanium implants. J Clin Periodontol 1999;26: 600-607.
20. Hermann JS, Cochran DL, Nummikoski PV, Buser D. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A radiographic evaluation of unloaded nonsubmerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontal 1997;68:1117-1130.
21. Hermann JS, Buser D, Schenk RK, Cochran DL. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 2000;71:1412-1424.
22. Hermann JS, Buser D, Schenk RK, Schoolfield JD, Cochran DL. Biologic width around one- and two-piece titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:559-571.
23. Broggini N, McManus LM, Hermann JS, et al. Persistent acute inflammation at the implant-abutment interface. J Dent Res 2003;82:232-237.
24. Piattelli A, Vrespa G, Petrone G, Iezzi G, Annibali S, Scarano A. Role of the microgap between implant and abutment: A retrospective histologic evaluation in monkeys. J Periodontol 2003;74:346-352.
25. Hermann JS, Schoolfield JD, Schenk RK, Buser D, Cochran DL. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 2001;72: 1372-1383.
26. King GN, Hermann JS, Schoolfield JD, Buser D, Cochran DL. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone levels in non-submerged dental implants: A radiographic study in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 2002;73:1111-1117.
27. Vela-Nebot X, Rodriguez-Ciurana X, Rodado-Alonso C, Segala-Torres M. Benefits of an implant platform modification technique to reduce crestal bone resorption. Implant Dent 2006;15:313-320.
28. Lazzara RJ, Porter SS. Platform switching: A new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006;26:9-17.
29. Baumgarten H, Cocchetto R, Testori T, Meltzer A, Porter S. A new implant design for crestal bone preservation: Initial observations and case report. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2005;17:735-740.
30. Hansson S. Implant-abutment interface: Biomechanical study of flap top versus conical. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:33-41.
31. Hansson S. A conical implant-abutment interface at the level of the marginal bone improves the distribution of stresses in the supporting bone. An axisymmetric finite element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:286-293.
32. Norton M. In vitro evaluation of the strength of the conical implant-to-abutment joint in two commercially available implant systems. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83: 567-571.
33. Cehreli M, Duyck J, De Cooman M, Puers R, Naert I. Implant design and interface force transfer. A photoelastic and strain-gauge analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:249-257.
34. Norton M. Marginal bone levels at single tooth implants with a conical fixture design. The influence of surface macro- and micro-structure. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:91-99.
35. Hansson S. The implant neck: Smooth or provided with retention elements. A biomechanical approach. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10:394-405.
36. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T. Tissue characteristics at microthreaded implants: An experimental study in dogs. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2006;8:107-113.
37. Shin YK, Han CH, Heo SJ, Kim S, Chun H.J. Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level around implants with different neck designs after 1 year. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:789-794.
38. Engquist B, Astrand P, Anzen B, et al. Simplified methods of implant treatment in the edentulous lower jaw. Part II: Early loading. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004;6:90-100.
39. Engquist B, Astrand P, Anzen B, et al. Simplified methods of implant treatment in the edentulous lower jaw: A 3-year follow-up report of a controlled prospective study of one-stage versus two-stage surgery and early loading. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7:95-104.
40. Karlsson U, Gotfredsen K, Olsson C. A 2-year report on maxillary and mandibular fixed partial dentures supported by Astra Tech dental implants. A comparison of 2 implants with different surface textures. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:235-242.
41. Gotfredsen K, Karlsson U. A prospective 5-year study of fixed partial prostheses supported by implants with a machined and TiO2-blasted surface. J Prosthodont 2001;10:2-7.
42. Astrand P, Engquist B, Dahlgren S, Engquist E, Feldmann H, Grondahl K. Astra Tech and Brånemark System implants: A prospective 5-year comparative study. Results after one year. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 1999;1:17-26.
43. Engquist B, Astrand P, Dahlgren S, Engquist E, Feldmann H, Grondahl K. Marginal bone reaction to oral implants: A prospective comparative study of Astra Tech and Brånemark System implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:30-37.
44. Astrand P, Engquist B, Dahlgren S, Grondahl K, Engquist E, Feldmann H. Astra Tech and Brånemark System implants: A 5-year prospective study of marginal bone reactions, Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15: 413-420.
45. Puchades-Roman L, Palmer RM, Palmer PJ, Howe LC, Ide M, Wilson RF. A clinical, radiographic, and microbiologic comparison of Astra Tech and Brånemark single tooth implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2: 78-84.
46. van Steenberghe D, De Mars G, Quirynen M, Jacobs R, Naert I. A prospective split-mouth comparative study of two screw-shaped self-tapping pure titanium implant systems. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:202-209.
47. Hallman M, Mordenfeld A, Strandkvist T. A retrospective 5-year follow-up study of two different titanium implant surfaces used after interpositional bone grafting for reconstruction of the atrophic edentulous maxilla. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7:121-126.
48. AIbrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria for success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25.
49. Wiskott HW, Belser UC. Lack of integration of smooth titanium surfaces: A working hypothesis based on strains generated in the surrounding bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10:429-444.
50. Abrahamsson I, Zitzmann NU, Berglundh T, Wennerberg A, Lindhe J. Bone and soft tissue integration to titanium implants with different surface topography: An experimental study in the dog. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:323-332.
51. Comut AA, Weber HP, Shortkroff S, Cui FZ, Spector M. Connective tissue orientation around dental implants in a canine model. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12: 433-440.
52. Schroeder A, van der Zypen E, Stich H, Sutter F. The reactions of bone, connective tissue, and epithelium to endosteal implants with titanium-sprayed surfaces. J Maxillofac Surg 1981;9:15-25.
53. Piattelli A, Scarano A, Piattelli M, Bertolai R, Panzoni E. Histologic aspects of the bone and soft tissues surrounding three titanium non-submerged plasma-sprayed implants retrieved at autopsy: A case report. J Periodontol 1997;68:694-700.
54. Capri D. Soft tissue management around dental implants. In: Dibart S, Karima M, eds. Practical Periodontal Plastic Surgery. Oxford, UK.: Blackwell Munksgaard; 2006:72.
55. Quirynen M, Bollen CML, Papaioannou W, van Eldere J, van Steenberghe D. The influence of titanium abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and gingivitis: Short-term observations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:169-178.
56. Teughels W, van Assche N, Sliepen 1, Quirynen M. Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17(Suppl. 2):68-81.
57. Esposito M, Coulthard P, Thomsen P, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: Different types of dental implants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;25:CD003815.