Spatial Attention and Audiovisual Interactions in Apparent Motion

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 927-937

  Sanabria, Daniel ^a,b   Soto Faraco, Salvador ^c   Spence, Charles ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

apparent motion; audition; cross modal interactions; spatial attention; vision

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548837190     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.927     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Alsius A., Navarra J., Campbell R., and Soto-Faraco S. Audiovisual integration of speech falters under high attention demands. Current Biology 15 (2005) 839-843
2. Battaglia P.W., Jacobs R.A., and Aslin R.N. Bayesian integration of visual and auditory signals for spatial localization. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 20 (2003) 1391-1397
3. Bedford F.L. Keeping perception accurate. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2 (1999) 4-11
4. Bedford F.L. Analysis of a constraint on perception, cognition, and development: One object, one place, one time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 30 (2004) 907-912
5. Beer A.L., and Röder B. Attention to motion enhances processing of both visual and auditory stimuli: An event-related potential study. Cognitive Brain Research 18 (2004) 205-225
6. Bertelson P., and Aschersleben G. Automatic visual bias of perceived auditory location. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 5 (1998) 482-489
7. Bertelson P., and de Gelder B. The psychology of multimodal perception. In: Spence C., and Driver J. (Eds). Crossmodal space and crossmodal attention (2004), Oxford University Press, Oxford, England 141-179
8. Bertelson P., Vroomen J., de Gelder B., and Driver J. The ventriloquist effect does not depend on the direction of deliberate visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics 62 (2000) 321-332
9. Briand K.A. Feature integration and spatial attention: More evidence of a dissociation between endogenous and exogenous orienting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 (1998) 1243-1256
10. Briand K.A., and Klein R.M. Is Posner's "beam" the same as Treisman's "glue"? On the relation between visual orienting and feature integration theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 13 (1987) 228-241
11. Caclin A., Soto-Faraco S., Kingstone A., and Spence C. Tactile "capture" of audition. Perception & Psychophysics 64 (2002) 616-630
12. Calvert G.A., Spence C., and Stein B.E. The handbook of multisensory processes (2004), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
13. Carrasco M., Williams P.E., and Yeshurun Y. Covert attention increases spatial resolution with or without masks: Support for signal enhancement. Journal of Vision 2 (2002) 467-479
14. Colby C., and Goldberg M.E. Space and attention in parietal cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience 22 (1999) 319-349
15. Corbetta M., and Shulman G.L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 3 (2002) 201-215
16. Craig J.C. Visual motion interferes with tactile motion perception. Perception 35 (2006) 351-367
17. Driver J. Enhancement of selective listening by illusory mislocation of speech sounds due to lip-reading. Nature 381 (1996, May 2) 66-68
18. Driver J., and Frith C. Shifting baselines in attention research. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 1 (2000) 147-148
19. Driver J., and Spence C. Crossmodal spatial attention: Evidence from human performance. In: Spence C., and Driver J. (Eds). Crossmodal space and crossmodal attention (2004), Oxford University Press, Oxford, England 179-220
20. Ernst M.O., and Bülthoff H.H. Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (2004) 162-169
21. Gibson J.J. The ecological approach to visual perception (1979), Houghton Mifflin, Boston
22. Gondan M., Niederhaus B., Rösler F., and Röder B. Multisensory processing in the redundant-target effect: A behavioral and event-related potential study. Perception & Psychophysics 67 (2005) 713-726
23. Hawkins H.L., Hillyard S.A., Luck S.J., Mouloua M., Downing C.J., and Woodward D.P. Visual attention modulates signal detectability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 16 (1990) 802-811
24. Jonides J., and Mack R. On the cost and benefit of cost and benefit. Psychological Bulletin 96 (1984) 29-44
25. Klein R.M., and Shore D.I. Relations among modes of visual orienting. In: Monsell S., and Driver J. (Eds). Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (2000), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 195-208
26. Lyons G., Sanabria D., Vatakis A., and Spence C. The modulation of crossmodal integration by unimodal perceptual grouping is unaffected by posture change: A visuo-tactile apparent motion study. Experimental Brain Research 174 (2006) 510-516
27. Mazza V., Turatto M., Rossi M., and Umiltà C. How automatic are audiovisual links in exogenous spatial attention?. Neuropsychologia 45 (2007) 514-522
28. McGurk H., and MacDonald J. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature 264 (1976, December 23-30) 746-748
29. Mondor T.A., and Amirault K.J. Effect of same- and different-modality spatial cues on auditory and visual target identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 (1998) 745-755
30. Morein-Zamir S., Soto-Faraco S., and Kingstone A. Auditory capture of vision: Examining temporal ventriloquism. Cognitive Brain Research 17 (2003) 154-163
31. Müller H.J., and Rabbitt P.M.A. Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 15 (1989) 315-330
32. Paul L., and Schyns P.G. Attention enhances feature integration. Vision Research 43 (2003) 1793-1798
33. Posner M.I., Snyder C.R.R., and Davidson B.J. Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 109 (1980) 160-174
34. Prinzmetal W., McCool C., and Park S. Attention: Reaction time and accuracy reveal different mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 134 (2005) 73-92
35. Prinzmetal W., Park S., and Garrett R. Involuntary attention and identification accuracy. Perception & Psychophysics 67 (2005) 1344-1353
36. Quinlan P.T. Visual feature integration theory: Past, present, and future. Psychological Bulletin 129 (2003) 643-673
37. Reynolds J.H., and Chelazzi L. Attention modulation of visual processing. Annual Reviews of Neuroscience 27 (2004) 611-647
38. Reynolds J.H., and Desimone R. The role of neural mechanisms of attention in solving the binding problem. Neuron 24 (1999) 19-29
39. Ruz M., and Lupiáñez J. A review of attentional capture: On its automaticity and sensitivity to endogenous control. Psicologica 23 (2002) 283-309
40. Sanabria D., Soto-Faraco S., Chan J., and Spence C. Intramodal perceptual grouping modulates multisensory integration: Evidence from the crossmodal dynamic capture task. Neuroscience Letters 377 (2005) 59-64
41. Sanabria D., Spence C., and Soto-Faraco S. Perceptual and decisional contributions to audiovisual interactions in the perception of motion: A signal detection study. Cognition 102 (2007) 299-310
42. Schneider W., Eschman A., and Zuccolotto A. E-Prime reference guide [Computer software manual] (2002), Psychology Software Tools, Pittsburgh, PA
43. Schneider W., Eschman A., and Zuccolotto A. E-Prime user's guide [Computer software manual] (2002), Psychology Software Tools, Pittsburgh, PA
44. Sengpiel F., and Hübener M. Spotlight on the primary visual cortex. Current Biology 9 (1999) 318-321
45. Senkowski D., Talsma D., Herrmann C.S., and Woldorff M.G. Multisensory processing and oscillatory gamma responses: Effects of spatial selective attention. Experimental Brain Research 166 (2005) 411-426
46. Soto-Faraco S., and Kingstone A. Multisensory integration of dynamic information. In: Calvert G.A., Spence C., and Stein B.E. (Eds). The handbook of multisensory processes (2004), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 49-69
47. Soto-Faraco S., Lyons J., Gazzaniga M., Spence C., and Kingstone A. The ventriloquist in motion: Illusory capture of dynamic information across sensory modalities. Cognitive Brain Research 14 (2002) 139-146
48. Soto-Faraco S., Ronald A., and Spence C. Tactile selective attention and body posture: Assessing the contribution of vision and proprioception. Perception & Psychophysics 66 (2004) 1077-1094
49. Soto-Faraco S., Spence C., and Kingstone A. Cross-modal dynamic capture: Congruency effects in the perception of motion across sensory modalities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 30 (2004) 330-345
50. Soto-Faraco S., Spence C., and Kingstone A. Assessing automaticity in the audio-visual integration of motion. Acta Psychologica 118 (2005) 71-92
51. Spence C., and Driver J. Audiovisual links in endogenous covert spatial attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22 (1996) 1005-1030
52. Spence C., and Driver J. Audiovisual links in exogenous covert spatial orienting. Perception & Psychophysics 59 (1997) 1-22
53. Spence C., and Driver J. Crossmodal space and crossmodal attention (2004), Oxford University Press, Oxford, England
54. Spence C.J., and Driver J. Covert spatial orienting in audition: Exogenous and endogenous mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20 (1994) 555-574
55. Spence C., McDonald J., and Driver J. Exogenous spatial-cuing studies of human crossmodal attention and multisensory integration. In: Spence C., and Driver J. (Eds). Crossmodal space and crossmodal attention (2004), Oxford University Press, Oxford, England 247-277
56. Spence C., Shore D.I., and Klein R.M. Multisensory prior entry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 130 (2001) 799-832
57. Strybel T.Z., and Vatakis A. A comparison of auditory and visual apparent motion presented individually and with crossmodal moving distractors. Perception 33 (2005) 1033-1048
58. Talsma D., and Woldorff M.G. Selective attention and multisensory integration: Multiple phases of effects on the evoked brain activity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17 (2005) 1098-1114
59. Tata M.S., Prime D.J., McDonald J.J., and Ward L.M. Transient spatial attention modulates distinct components of the auditory ERP. NeuroReport 12 (2001) 3679-3682
60. Tata M.S., and Ward L.M. Spatial attention modulates activity in a posterior "where" auditory pathway. Neuropsychologia 43 (2005) 509-516
61. Treisman A. Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 8 (1982) 194-214
62. Treisman A. The binding problem. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 6 (1996) 171-178
63. Treisman A., and Davies A. Divided attention to ear and eye. In: Kornblum S. (Ed). Attention and performance 4 (1973), Academic Press, New York 101-117
64. Treisman A., and Gelade G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology 12 (1980) 97-136
65. Treisman A., and Schmidt H. Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology 14 (1982) 107-141
66. Treue S. Perceptual enhancement of contrast by attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (2004) 435-437
67. Vecera S.P., and Farah M.J. Does visual attention select objects or locations?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 123 (1994) 146-160
68. Vibell J., Klinge C., Zampini M., Spence C., and Nobre A.C. Temporal order is coded temporally in the brain: Early ERP latency shifts underlying prior entry in a crossmodal temporal order judgment task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19 (2007) 109-120
69. Vroomen J., Bertelson P., and de Gelder B. Directing spatial attention towards the illusory location of a ventriloquized sound. Acta Psychologica 108 (2001) 21-33
70. Vroomen J., Bertelson P., and de Gelder B. The ventriloquist effect does not depend on the direction of automatic visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics 63 (2001) 651-659
71. Vroomen J., and de Gelder B. Sound enhances visual perception: Cross-modal effects of auditory organization on vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26 (2000) 1583-1590
72. Vroomen J., and de Gelder B.E. Temporal ventriloquism: Sound modulates the flash-lag effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 30 (2004) 513-518
73. Welch R.B., and Warren D.H. Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy. Psychonomic Bulletin 3 (1980) 638-667
74. Wolfe J.M. Moving towards solutions to some enduring controversies in visual search. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (2003) 70-76
75. Wuerger S.M., Hofbauer M., and Meyer G.F. The integration of auditory and visual motion signals at threshold. Perception & Psychophysics 65 (2003) 1188-1196