Events before the flash Do influence the flash-lag magnitude

Vision Research

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 235-239

  Chappell, Mark ^a   Hine, Trevor J ^a  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Flash lag; Illusion; Motion; Postdiction; Spatial localisation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0345293200     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.09.021     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Brenner E., Smeets J.B. Motion extrapolation is not responsible for the flash-lag effect. Vision Research. 40:2000;1645-1648.
2. Chappell M., Hine T.J. The flash-lag effect does depend on events before the flash. Perception. 31(Suppl.):2002;41.
3. Eagleman D.M., Sejnowski T.J. Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. Science. 287:2000;2036-2038.
4. Eagleman D.M., Sejnowski T.J. Response to the position of moving objects. Science. 289:2000;1107a.
5. Eagleman D.M., Sejnowski T.J. Untangling spatial from temporal illusions. Trends in the Neurosciences. 25:2002;293.
6. Finney D.J. Probit Analysis. 3rd ed. 1971;University Press, Cambridge.
7. Hikosaka O., Miyauchi S., Shimojo S. Focal visual attention produces illusory temporal order and motion sensation. Vision Research. 33:1993;1219-1240.
8. Jonides J., Irwin D.E., Yantis S. Failure to integrate information from successive fixations. Science. 222:1983;188.
9. Khurana B., Nijhawan R. Reply to Extrapolation or attention shift. Nature. 378:1995;566.
10. Krekelberg B., Lappe M. A model of the perceived relative positions of moving objects based on a slow averaging process. Vision Research. 40:2000;201-215.
11. Krekelberg B., Lappe M. The position of moving objects. Science. 289:2000;1107a.
12. Krekelberg B., Lappe M. Neuronal latencies and the position of moving objects. Trends in the Neurosciences. 24:2001;335-339.
13. Müsseler J., Stork S., Kerzel D. Comparing mislocalizations with moving stimuli: The Fröhlich effect, the flash-lag effect, and representational momentum. Visual Cognition. 9:2002;120-138.
14. Nijhawan R. Neural delays, visual motion and the flash-lag effect. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 6:2002;387-393.
15. Steinman B.A., Steinman S.B., Lehmkuhle S. Visual attention mechanisms show a center-surround organization. Vision Research. 35:1995;1859-1869.
16. van de Grind W. Physical, neural, and mental timing. Consciousness and Cognition. 11:2002;241-264.
17. Whitney D., Cavanagh P. The position of moving objects. Science. 289:2000;1107a.
18. Whitney D., Murakami I., Cavanagh P. Illusory spatial offset of a flash relative to a moving stimulus is caused by differential latencies for moving and flashed stimuli. Vision Research. 40:2000;137-149.
19. Wolf W., Deubel H. P31 phosphor persistence at photopic mean luminance level. Spatial Vision. 10:1997;323-333.