Spontaneous conformational changes in the E. coli GroEL subunit from all-atom molecular dynamics simulations

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 93, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1906-1916

  Sliozberg, Yelena ^a   Abrams, Cameron F ^a  

^a Drexel University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; AMINO ACID; CHAPERONIN; NUCLEOTIDE; POTASSIUM MAGNESIUM ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; WATER;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; DENATURATION; ESCHERICHIA COLI; HYDROPHOBICITY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FOLDING; SIMULATION; VIBRATION;

ESCHERICHIA COLI;

EID: 34548782235     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.107.108043     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Sigler, P. B., Z. Xu, H. S. Rye, S. G. Burston, W. A. Fenton, and A. L. Horwich. 1998. Structure and function in GroEL-mediated protein folding. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67:581-608.
2. Horwich, A. L., F. W. Farr, and W. A. Fenton. 2006. GroEL-GroES-mediated protein folding. Chem. Rev. 106:1917-1930.
3. Hohn, T., B. Hohn, A. Engel, M. Wurtz, and P. R. Smith. 1979. Isolation and characterization of the host protein groE involved in bacteriophage l-assembly. J. Mol. Biol. 129:359-373.
4. Hendrix, R. W. 1979. Purification and properties of groE, a host protein involved in bacteriophage assembly. J. Mol. Biol. 129:375-392.
5. Hunt, J. F., A. J. Weaver, S. J. Landry, L. Gierasch, and J. Deisenhofer. 1996. The crystal structure of the GroES co-chaperonin at 2.8 Å resolution. Nature. 379:37-45.
6. Gray, T. E., and A. R. Fersht. 1991. Cooperativity in ATP hydrolysis by GroEL is increased by GroES. FEBS Lett. 292:254-258.
7. Inobe, T., T. Makio, E. Takasu-Ishikawa, T. P. Terada, and K. Kuwajima. 2001. Nucleotide binding to the chaperonin GroEL: noncooperative binding of ATP analogs and ADP, and cooperative effect of ATP. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1545:160-173.
8. Yifrach, O., and A. Horovitz. 1995. Nested cooperativity in the ATPase activity of the oligomeric chaperonin GroEL. Biochemistry. 34:5303-5308.
9. Bochkareva, E. S., N. M. Lissin, G. C. Flynn, J. E. Rothman, and A. S. Girshovich. 1992. Positive cooperativity in the functioning of molecular chaperone GroEL. J. Biol. Chem. 267:6796-6800.
10. Xu, Z., A. L. Horwich, and P. B. Sigler. 1997. The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL-GroES-(ADP)7 chaperonin complex. Nature. 388:741-750.
11. Fenton, W. A., J. S. Weissman, and A. L. Horwich. 1996. Putting a lid on protein folding: structure and function of the co-chaperonin, GroES. Chem. Biol. 3:157-161.
12. Braig, K., Z. Otwinovski, R. Hedge, D. C. Boisvert, A. Joachimiak, A. L. Horwich, and P. B. Sigler. 1994. The crystal structure of bacterial chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 Å. Nature. 371:578-586.
13. γS. Nat. Struct. Biol. 3:170-177.
14. Fenton, W. A., Y. Kashi, K. Furtak, and A. L. Horwich. 1994. Residues in chaperonin GroEL required for polypeptide binding and release. Nature. 371:614-619.
15. Ma, J., and M. Karplus. 1998. The allosteric mechanism of the chaperonin GroEL: a dynamic analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:8502-8507.
16. Ranson, N. A., G. W. Farr, A. M. Rosenman, B. Gowen, W. A. Fenton, A. L. Horwich, and H. R. Saibil. 2001. ATP-bound states of GroEL captured by cryo-electron microscopy. Cell. 107:869-879.
17. 14 at 2.0 Å resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 327:843-855.
18. 196→ Ala. J. Mol. Biol. 243:397-401.
19. Ma, J., P. B. Sigler, Z. Xu, and M. Karplus. 2000. A dynamic model for the allosteric mechanism of GroEL. J. Mol. Biol. 302:303-313.
20. Hyeon, C., G. H. Lorimer, and D. Thirumalai. 2006. Dynamics of allosteric transitions in GroEL. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103:18939-18944.
21. 197 → A. Nat. Struct. Biol. 4:690-694.
22. Kalé, L., R. Skeel, M. Bhandarkar, R. Brunner, A. Gursoy, N. Krawetz, J. Phillips, A. Shinozaki, K. Varadarajan, and K. Schulten. 1999. NAMD2: greater scalability for parallel molecular dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 151:283-312.
23. MacKerell, Jr., A. D., D. Bashford, M. Bellott, R. L. Dunbrack, Jr., J. D. Evanseck, M. J. Field, S. Fischer, J. Gao, H. Guo, S. Ha, D. Joseph-McCarthy, L. Kuchnir, K. Kuczera, F. K. Lau, C. Mattos, S. Michnick, T. Ngo, D. T. Nguyen, B. Prodhom, W. E. R. Koeppe III, B. Roux, M. Schlenkrich, J. C. Smith, R. Stote, J. Straub, M. Watanabe, J. Wiórkiewicz-Kuczera, D. Yin, and M. Karplus. 1998. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B. 102:3586-3616.
24. Follope, N., and A. D. MacKerell, Jr. 2000. All-atom empirical force field for nucleic acids. I. Parameter optimization based on small molecule and condensed phase macromolecular target data. J. Comput. Chem. 21:86-104.
25. MacKerell, A. D., Jr., and N. K. Banavali. 2000. All-atom empirical force field for nucleic acids. II. Application to molecular dynamics simulations of DNA and RNA in solution. J. Comput. Chem. 21:105-120.
26. Bartolucci, C., D. Lamba, S. Grazulis, E. Manakova, and H. Heumann. 2005. Crystal structure of wild-type chaperonin GroEL. J. Mol. Biol. 354:940-951.
27. Ranson, N. A., D. K. Clare, G. W. Farr, D. Houldershaw, A. L. Horwich, and H. R. Saibil. 2006. Allosteric signaling of ATP hydrolysis in GroEL-GroES complexes. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13:147-152.
28. Pearlman, D. A., D. A. Case, J. W. Caldwell, W. Ross, I. T. E. Cheatham, S. DeBolt, D. Ferguson, G. Seibel, and P. Kollman. 1995. AMBER, a package of computer programs for applying molecular mechanics, normal mode analysis, molecular dynamics and free energy calculations to simulate the structural and energetic properties of molecules. Comput. Phys. Comm. 91:1-41.
29. 155 → Ala. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100:13797-13802.
30. Schlitter, J., M. Engels, P. Kruger, E. U. Jacoby, and W. Wollmer. 1993. Targeted molecular dynamics simulation of conformational change: application to the T-R transition in insulin. Mol. Sim. 10:291-308.
31. Cliff, M. J., N. M. Kad, N. Hay, P. A. Lund, M. R. Webb, S. G. Burston, and A. R. Clarke. 1999. A kinetic analysis of the nucleotide-induced allosteric transitions of GroEL. J. Mol. Biol. 293:667-684.
32. Yifrach, O., and A. Horovitz. 1998. Mapping the transition state of the allosteric pathway of GroEL by protein engineering. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120:13262-13263.
33. 126 → Val with known crystal structure. J. Mol. Biol. 258:732-735.
34. Humphrey, W., A. Dalke, and K. Schulten. 1996. VMD - visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14:33-38.
35. Frishman, D., and P. Argos. 1995. Knowledge-based protein secondary structure assignment. Proteins. 23:566-579.