Antipredator defences in sticklebacks: Trade-offs, risk sensitivity, and behavioural syndromes

Biology of the Three-Spined Stickleback

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 127-156

  Huntingford, Felicity ^a   Coyle, Susan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548768458     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (82)

1. Reimchen, T.E., Predators and morphological evolution in threespine stickleback, in The Evolutionary Biology of the Threespine Stickleback, Bell, M.A. and Foster, S.A., Eds., Oxford Scientific Publications, Oxford, 1994.
2. Wootton, R.J., The Biology of the Sticklebacks, Academic Press, London, 1976.
3. Giles, N., Development of the overhead fright response in wild and predator-naive three-spined sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus L., Anim. Behav., 32, 276, 1984.
4. Doucette, L.I., Skulason, S., and Snorrason, S.S., Risk of predation as a promoting factor of species divergence in threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.), Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 82, 189, 2004.
5. Wootton, R.J., A Functional Biology of Sticklebacks, Croom Helm, London, 1984.
6. Hoogland, R., Morris, D., and Tinbergen, N., The spines of sticklebacks (Gasterosteus and Pygosteus) as means of defense against predators (Perca and Esox), Behaviour, 10, 236, 1957.
7. Mathis, A. and Chivers, D.P., Overriding the oddity effect in mixed-species aggregations: group choice by armoured and nonarmoured prey, Behav. Ecol., 14, 334, 2003.
8. Reimchen, T.E., Predator handling failures of lateral plate morphs in Gasterosteus aculeatus: functional implications for the ancestral plate condition, Behaviour, 137, 1081, 2000.
9. Vamosi, S.M. and Schluter, D., Character shifts in the defensive armor of sympatric sticklebacks, Evolution, 58, 376, 2004.
10. Abrahams, M.V., The interaction between antipredator behaviour and antipredator morphology: experiments with fathead minnows and brook stickleback, Can. J. Zool., 73, 2209, 1995.
11. Krause, J. et al., Species-specific patterns of refuge use in fish: the role of metabolic expenditure and body length, Behaviour, 137, 1113, 2000.
12. Grand, T.C., Risk-taking by threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) pelvic phenotypes: does morphology predict behaviour?, Behaviour, 137, 889, 2000.
13. Benzie, V.L., Some Aspects of the Anti-Predator Responses of Two Species of Stickleback, Thesis, 1965.
14. Kraak, S.B.M., Bakker, T.C.M., and Hocevar, S., Stickleback males, especially large and red ones, are more likely to nest concealed in macrophytes, Behaviour, 137, 907, 2000.
15. Coolen, I. et al., Species difference in adaptive use of public information in sticklebacks, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 270, 2413, 2003.
16. Chivers, D.P. and Smith, R.J.F., Intraspecific and interspecific avoidance of areas marked with skin extract from brook stickleback (Cilaea inconstans) in a natural habitat, J. Chem. Ecol., 20, 1517, 1994.
17. Chivers, D.P., Brown, G.E., and Smith, J.F., Acquired recognition of chemical stimuli from pike, Esox lucius, by brook sticklebacks, Culaea inconstans (Osteichthyes, Gasterosteidae), Ethology, 99, 234, 1995.
18. Mirza, R.S. and Chivers, D.P., Learned recognition of heterospecific alarm signals: the importance of a mixed predator diet, Ethology, 107, 1007, 2001.
19. Pitcher T.J. and Parrish, J.K., Functions of shoaling and behavior in teleosts, in Behavior of Teleost Fishes, Reuter H. and Breckling, B., Eds., Chapman and Hall, London, 1993.
20. Milinski, M. et al., Cooperation under predation risk: experiments on costs and benefits, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 264, 831, 1997.
21. Andraso, G.M., A comparison of startle response in two morphs of the brook stickleback (Culaea inconstans): further evidence for a trade-off between defensive morphology and swimming ability, Evol. Ecol., 11, 83, 1997.
22. Rodewald A.D. and Foster, S.A., Effects of gravidity on habitat use and antipredator behaviour in three-spined sticklebacks, J. Fish. Biol., 52, 973, 1998.
23. Peuhkuri, N., Ranta, E., and Seppa, P., Size-assortative schooling in free-ranging sticklebacks, Ethology, 103, 318, 1997.
24. Peuhkuri, N., Size-assorted fish shoals and the majority’s choice, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 46, 307, 1999.
25. Frommen, J.G. and Bakker, T.C.M., Adult three-spined sticklebacks prefer to shoal with familiar kin, Behaviour, 141, 1401, 2004.
26. Huntingford, F.A., Wright, P.J., and Tierney, J.F., Adaptive variation in antipredator behaviour in threespine stickleback., in Evolutionary Biology of the Threespined Stickleback, Bell, M.A. and Foster, S.A., Eds., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1994.
27. Walker, J.A., Ecological morphology of lacustrine threespine stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus L. (Gasterosteidae) body shape, Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 61, 3, 1997.
28. Walling, C.A. et al., Predator inspection behaviour in three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus): body size, local predation pressure and cooperation, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 56, 164, 2004.
29. Vamosi, S.M., Predation sharpens the adaptive peaks: survival trade-offs in sympatric sticklebacks, Ann. Zool. Fenn., 39, 237, 2002.
30. Reimchen, T.E. and Nosil, P., Variable predation regimes predict the evolution of sexual dimorphism in a population of threespine stickleback, Evolution, 58, 1274, 2004.
31. Andraso G.M. and Barron, J.N., Evidence for a trade-off between defensive morphology and startle-response performance in the brook stickleback (Culaea inconstans), Can. J. Zool., 73, 1147, 1995.
32. Bergstrom, C.A., Fast-start swimming performance and reduction in lateral plate number in threespine stickleback, Can. J. Zool., 80, 207, 2002.
33. Axelrod, R. and Hamilton, W., The evolution of behaviour, Science, 211, 1390, 1981.
34. Milinski, M., Tit-for-tat in sticklebacks and the evolution of cooperation, Nature, 325, 433, 1987.
35. Master, W.M. and Waite, T.A., Tit-for-tat during predator inspection, or shoaling?, Behaviour, 39, 603, 1989.
36. Lazarus, J. and Metcalfe, N.B., Tit-for-tat cooperation in sticklebacks: a critique of Milinski, Anim. Behav., 39, 987, 1990.
37. Milinski, M., No alternative to tit-for-tat cooperation in sticklebacks, Anim. Behav., 39, 989, 1989.
38. Milinski, M., On cooperation in sticklebacks, Anim. Behav., 40, 1190, 1992.
39. Ward, A.J.W. et al., Correlates of boldness in three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus), Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 55, 561, 2004.
40. Milinski, M., Kulling, D., and Kettler, R., Tit-for-tat: sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) trusting a cooperative partner, Behav. Ecol., 1, 7, 1990.
41. Huntingford, F.A., Lazarus, J., Barrie, B., and Webb, S.A., A dynamic analysis of cooperative predator inspection in sticklebacks, Animal Behavior, 47, 413-419, 1994.
42. Milinski, M. and Heller, R., Influence of a predator on the optimal foraging behaviour of sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus), Nature, 275, 642, 1978.
43. Peeke, H.V.S. and Morgan, L.E., Behavioural differentiation of adjacent marine and fluvial populations of threespine stickleback in California: a laboratory study, Behaviour, 137, 1011, 2000.
44. Krause, J., The influence of hunger on shoal size choice by three-spined sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus, J. Fish. Biol., 43, 775, 1993.
45. Peuhkuri, N., Shoal composition, body size and foraging in sticklebacks, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 43, 333, 1998.
46. Krause, J., Ideal free distribution and the mechanism of patch profitability assessment in three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus), Behaviour, 123, 27, 1992.
47. Candolin, U., The relationship between signal quality and physical condition: is sexual signalling honest in the three-spined stickleback?, Anim. Behav., 58, 1261, 1999.
48. Candolin, U. and Voigt, H.R., Do changes in risk-taking affect habitat shifts of sticklebacks?, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 55, 42, 2003.
49. Candolin, U. and Voigt, H.R., Size-dependent selection on arrival times in sticklebacks: why small males arrive first, Evolution, 57, 862, 2003.
50. Ukegbu, A.A. and Huntingford, F.A., Brood value and life expectancy as determinants of parental investment in male three-spined sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus, Ethology, 78, 72, 1988.
51. Candolin, U. and Voigt, H.R., Correlation between male size and territory quality: consequences of male competition or predation susceptibility, OIKOS, 95, 225, 2001.
52. Candolin, U. and Voigt, H.R., Predator-induced nest site preference: safe nests allow courtship in sticklebacks, Anim. Behav., 56, 1205, 1998.
53. Coyle, S., unpublished data, 2006.
54. Huntingford, F.A., A Comparison of Anti-Predator Behaviour and Aggression Towards Conspecifics in the Three-Spined Stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus, Ph.D. thesis, Oxford University, 1973.
55. Huntingford, F.A., The relationship between anti-predator behaviour and aggression among conspecifics in the three-spined stickleback, Anim. Behav., 24, 245, 1976.
56. Gosling, S.D., From mice to men: what can we learn about personality from animal research, Psychol. Bull., 127, 45, 2001.
57. Sinn, D.L. and Moltschaniwskyj, N.A., Personality traits in Dumpling squid (Euprymna tasmanica): context-specific traits and their correlation with biological characteristics, J. Comp. Pyschol., 119, 99, 2005.
58. Sih, A., Bell, A., and Johnson, J.C., Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview, Trends Ecol. Evol., 19, 372, 2004.
59. Koolhaas, J.M. et al., Coping styles in animals: current status in behavior and stressphysiology, Neurosci. Behav. Rev., 23, 925, 1999.
60. Wilson, D.S. et al., Shyness and boldness in humans and other animals, Trends Ecol. Evol., 9, 442, 1994.
61. Wilson, D.S. et al., The shy-bold continuum: an ecological study of a psychological trait, J. Comp. Pyschol., 107, 250, 1993.
62. Bell, A.M., Behavioural differences between individuals and two populations of stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus), J. Evol. Biol., 18, 464, 2005.
63. Dingemanse, N.J. et al., The evolution of behavioural syndromes within and between stickleback populations, in press.
64. Dingemanse, N.J., personal communication, 2006.
65. Pottinger T.G. and Carrick, T.R., Modification of the plasma cortisol response to stress in rainbow trout by selective breeding, Gen. Comp. Endocrinol., 116, 122, 1999.
66. Schjolden, J. et al., Brain serotonergic activity in rainbow trout divergent in stress responsiveness, in press.
67. Sluyter, F., van Oortmerssen, G.A and Koolhaas, J.M., Studies on wild house mice VI: differential effects of the Y chromosome on intermale aggression, Aggressive Behav., 20, 379, 1994.
68. Bakker, T.C.M., Aggressiveness in sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.): a behaviour- genetic study, Behaviour, 98, 1, 1986.
69. Wright, D. et al., QTL analysis of behavioral and morphological differentiation between wild and laboratory Zebrafish (Danio rerio), Behav. Genet., 1, 2006.
70. Fitzpatrick, M.J. et al., Candidate genes for behavioural ecology, Trends Ecol. Evol., 20, 96, 2005.
71. Sinn, D.L. et al., Early temperamental traits in an octopus (Octopus bimaculoides), J. Comp. Pyschol., 115, 351, 2001.
72. Bell A.M. and Stamps, J.A., Development of behavioural differences between individuals and populations of sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus, Anim. Behav., 68, 1339, 2004.
73. Dingemanse, N.J. et al., Fitness consequences of avian personalities in a fluctuating environment, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 271, 847, 2004.
74. Coleman K. and Wilson, D.S., Shyness and boldness in pumpkinseed sunfish: individual differences are context specific, Anim. Behav., 56, 927, 1998.
75. Fraser, D.F. et al., Explaining leptokurtic movement distributions: intrapopulation variation in boldness and exploration, Am. Nat., 158, 124, 2001.
76. Yoshida, M., Nagamine, M., and Uematsu, K., Comparison of behavioral responses to a novel environment between three teleosts, bluegill Lepomis macrochirus, crucian carp Carassius langsdorfii, and goldfish Carassius auratus, Fish. Sci., 71, 314, 2005.
77. Brown C. and Braithwaite, V.A., Size matters: a test of boldness in eight populations of the peociliid Brachyraphis episopi, Anim. Behav., 68, 1325, 2004.
78. Budaev, S.V., Zworykin, D.D., and Mochek, A.D., Consistency of individual differences in behaviour of the lion-head cichlid, Steatocranus casuarius., Behav. Process., 48, 49, 1999.
79. Brick O. and Jakobsson, S., Individual variation in risk taking: the effect of a predatory threat on fighting behavior in Nannacara anomala, Behav. Ecol., 13, 439, 2002.
80. Sundström, L.F. et al., Hatchery selection promotes boldness in newly hatched brown trout (Salmo trutta): implications for dominance, Behav. Ecol., 15, 192, 2004.
81. Iguchi, K.I., Matsubara, N., and Hakoyama, H., Behavioural individuality assessed from two strains of cloned fish, Anim. Behav., 61, 351, 2001.
82. Sneddon, L.U., The bold and the shy: individual differences in rainbow trout, J. Fish. Biol., 62, 971, 2003.