Predator-induced nest site preference: Safe nests allow courtship in sticklebacks

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 56, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 1205-1211

  Candolin, Ulrika ^a   Voigt, Heinz Rudolf ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COURTSHIP; HABITAT STRUCTURE; NEST SITE; PREDATION RISK; SITE SELECTION;

GASTEROSTEUS ACULEATUS;

EID: 0032213717     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0892     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Anderson O. Optimal foraging by largemouth bass in structured environments. Ecology. 65:1984;851-861.
2. Andersson M. B. Sexual Selection. 1994;Princeton University Press, Princeton.
3. Berglund A. Risky sex: male pipefishes mate at random in the presence of a predator. Animal Behaviour. 46:1993;169-175.
4. Candolin U. Predation risk affects courtship and attractiveness of competing threespine stickleback males. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 41:1997;81-87.
5. Endler J. A. Natural and sexual selection on colour patterns in poeciliid fishes. Environmental Biology of Fishes. 9:1983;173-190.
6. Farr J. A. The role of predation in the evolution of social behaviour of natural populations of the guppy,Poecilia reticulata. Evolution. 29:1975;151-158.
7. Farr J. A. Social behaviour as determinants of reproductive success in the guppy,Poecilia reticulata. Behaviour. 74:1980;38-91.
8. Fuller R., Berglund A. Behavioural responses of a sex-role reversed pipefish to a gradient of perceived predation risk. Behavioral Ecology. 7:1996;69-75.
9. Godin J.-G. J. Predation risk and alternative mating tactics in male Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata. Oecologia. 103:1995;224-229.
10. Godin J.-G. J., Briggs S. E. Female mate choice under predation risk in the guppy. Animal Behaviour. 51:1996;117-130.
11. Godin J.-G. J., MacAulay A. Predator-mediated changes in male courtship affect female mate choice in sticklebacks. Advances in Ethology. 32:1997;205.
12. Gwynne D. T. Does copulation increase the risk of predation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 4:1989;54-56.
13. Hastings P. A. Flexible responses to predators in a marine fish. Ethology, Ecology and Evolution. 3:1991;177-184.
14. Houde A. E. The effects of female mate choice and male-male competition on the mating success of male guppies. Animal Behaviour. 36:1988;888-896.
15. Ibrahim A. A., Huntingford F. A. Laboratory and field studies of the effect of predation risk on foraging in three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus. Behaviour. 109:1989;46-57.
16. Jakobsen P. J., Johnsen G. H., Larsson P. Effects of predation risk and parasitism on the feeding ecology, habitat use, and abundance of lacustrine threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science. 45:1988;426-431.
17. Kodric-Brown A. Female choice of multiple male criteria in guppies: interacting effects of dominance, coloration and courtship. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 32:1993;415-420.
18. Kynard B. E. Breeding behavior of a lacustrine population of threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus. Behaviour. 67:1978;178-207.
19. Lima S. L., Dill L. M. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 68:1990;619-640.
20. Magnhagen C. Predation risk as a cost of reproduction. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 6:1991;183-186.
21. Moodie G. E. E. Predation, natural selection and adaptation in an unusual threespine stickleback. Heredity. 28:1972;155-167.
22. ter Pelkwijk J. J., Tinbergen N. Eine reizbiologische Analyse einiger Verhaltensweisen vonGasterosteus aculeatus. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie. 1:1937;193-200.
23. Persson L., Eklöv P. Prey refuges affecting interactions between piscivorous perch and juvenile perch and roach. Ecology. 76:1995;70-81.
24. Reynolds J. D. Should attractive individuals court more? Theory and a test. American Naturalist. 141:1993;914-927.
25. Rowland W. J. Proximate determinants of stickleback behaviour: an evolutionary perspective. The Evolutionary Biology of the Threespine Stickleback. 1994;Oxford University Press. Oxford. p. 297-344.
26. Savino J. F., Stein R. A. Predator-prey interactions between largemouth bass and bluegills by simulated, submerged vegetation. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. 111:1982;255-266.
27. Savino J. F., Stein R. A. Behavioural interactions between fish predators and their prey: effect of plant density. Animal Behaviour. 37:1989;311-321.
28. Sih A. The effects of predators on habitat use, activity and mating behaviour of a semi-aquatic bug. Animal Behaviour. 36:1988;1846-1848.
29. Sih A. Predation risk and the evolutionary ecology of reproductive behaviour. Journal of Fish Biology. 45 (Suppl. A):1994;111-130.
30. Sih A., Krupa J., Travers S. An experimental study on the effects of predation risk and feeding regime on the mating behavior of the water strider. American Naturalist. 135:1990;284-290.
31. Whoriskey F. G., FitzGerald G. J. The effects of bird predation on an estuarine stickleback (Pisces: Gasterosteidae) community. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 63:1985;301-307.
32. Whoriskey F. G., FitzGerald G. J. Ecology of the threespine stickleback on the breeding grounds. Bell M. A., Foster S. A. The Evolutionary Biology of the Threespine Stickleback. 1994;188-206 Oxford University Press. Oxford.