Learning to listen: From historical sources to classroom practice

Educational Studies in Mathematics

Volumn 66, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 111-129

  Arcavi, Abraham ^a   Isoda, Masami ^b  

^a WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

Author keywords

Constructivist teaching; History of mathematics; Learning to listen; Teacher education; Teacher student interactions

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548739037     PISSN: 00131954     EISSN: 15730816     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10649-006-9075-8     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Aharoni, R. (2003). What I learnt in primary school. In Invited talk at the 55th British Mathematics Colloquium (BCM). University of Birmingham, Great Britain, available at http://www.math.technion.ac.il/~ra/education.html
2. Arcavi, A. (1987). Using historical materials in the mathematics classroom. Arithmetic Teacher, 35(4), 13-16.
3. Arcavi, A., & Bruckheimer, M. (2000). Didactical uses of primary sources from the history of mathematics. Themes in Education, 1(1), 44-64.
4. Ball, D. L. (1988). Unlearning to teach mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 8(1), 40-48.
5. Ball, D. L. (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. The Elementary School Journal, 93(4), 373-397.
6. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners - Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession. Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3-32). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7. Confrey, J. (1991). Learning to listen: A student's understanding of powers of ten. In E. von Glasersfeld (Ed.), Radical constructivism in mathematics education (pp. 111-138). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
8. Cooney, T., & Krainer, K. (1996). Inservice mathematics teacher education: The importance of listening. In A. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 1155-1185). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
9. Crespo, S. (2000). Seeing more than right and wrong answers: Prospective teachers' interpretations of students' mathematical work. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3(2), 155-181.
10. Davis, B. (1997). Listening for differences: An evolving conception of mathematics teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(3), 355-376.
11. Even, R., & Wallach, T. (2004). Between student observation and student assessment: A critical reflection. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 4(4), 483-495.
12. Freudenthal, H. (1983). The didactical phenomenology of mathematical structures. Dordrecht: Reidel.
13. Ginsburg, H., & Opper, S. (1979). Piaget's theory of intellectual development (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
14. Henderson, D. W. (1996). I learn mathematics from my students - Multiculturalism in action. For the Learning of Mathematics, 16(2), 46-52.
15. Isoda, M. (2002). Hermeneutics for humanizing mathematics education (in Japanese). Tsukuba Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21, 1-10.
16. Isoda, M., & Kishimoto, T. (2005). A problem solving lesson approach for understanding mathematics in elementary school (in Japanese). Tokyo: Meijitosyo.
17. Isoda, M., Stephens, M., Ohara, Y., & Miyakawa, T. (2007). Japanese lesson study in mathematics. Singapore: World Scientific.
18. Jahnke, H. N. (1994). The historical dimension of mathematical understanding - Objectifying the subjective. In J. P. da Ponte, & J. F. Matos (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th international conference for the psychology of mathematics education, vol. 1 (pp. 139-156). Lisbon, Portugal.
19. Jahnke, H. N. (1996). Set and measure as an example of complementarity. In H. N. Jahnke, N. Knoche & M. Otte (Eds.), History of mathematics and education: Ideas and experiences (pp. 173-193). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.
20. Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. Yale University Press.
21. Lewis, C. (2002). Lesson study: A handbook of teacher-led instructional change. Research for Better Schools: Philadelphia.
22. Moschkovich, J. N. (2004). Appropriating mathematical practices: A case study of learning to use and explore functions through interaction with a tutor. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 55(1-3), 49-80.
23. Nathan, M. J., & Petrosino, A. (2003). Expert blind spot among preservice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 905-928.
24. Peet, T. E. (1970). The Rhind mathematical papyrus. University of Liverpool Press.
25. Sfard, A. (1994). What history of mathematics has to offer to psychology of mathematical thinking. In J. P. da Ponte, & J. F. Matos (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th international conference for the psychology of mathematics education, vol. 1 (pp. 129-132). Lisbon, Portugal.
26. Smith, D. E. (1958). History of mathematics, vol. II. New York: Dover.
27. Smith, T. J. (2003). Pedagogy as conversation: A metaphor for learning together. In Invited keynote address. Mathematics Association of Victoria Annual Conference, Monash University: Melbourne, available at http://www.mav.vic.edu. au/pd/confs/2003/papers/Smith_paper.pdf
28. Wallach, T., & Even, R. (2002). Teacher hearing students. In A. D. Cockburn, & E. Nardi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th international conference for the psychology of mathematics education, vol. 4 (pp. 337-344). Norwich, England.