Perception of breast cancer: Eye-position analysis of mammogram interpretation

Academic Radiology

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 4-12

  Mello Thoms, Claudia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms, diagnosis; Computers, diagnostic aid; Diagnostic radiology, observer performance

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; EYE POSITION; EYE TRACKING; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; RESIDENT; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

EID: 0037216360     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80782-1     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Krupinski EA. Visual scanning patterns of radiologists searching mammograms. Acad Radiol 1996; 3:137-144.
2. Martin JE, Moskowitz M, Milbrath JR. Breast cancers missed by mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1979; 132:737-758.
3. Hoffman JE. Visual attention and eye movements. In: Pashler H, ed. Attention. Hove, England: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
4. Krupinski EA, Nodine CF, Kundel HL. Enhancing recognition of lesions in radiographic images using perceptual feedback. Optom Eng 1998; 37:813-818.
5. Kundel HL, Nodine CF, Krupinski EA. Computer-displayed eye position as a visual aid to pulmonary nodule interpretation. Invest Radiol 1990; 25:890-896.
6. Nodine CF, Kundel HL. Using eye movements to study visual search and to improve tumor detection. RadioGraphics 1987; 7:1241-1250.
7. Mello-Thoms C, Dunn SM, Nodine CF, Kundel HL. An analysis of perceptual errors in reading mammograms using quasi-local spatial frequency spectra. J Digit Imaging 2001; 14:117-123.
8. Mello-Thoms C, Dunn SM, Nodine CF, Kundel HL. The perception of breast cancers: A spatial frequency analysis of what differentiates missed from reported cancers. IEEE Trans Med Imaging (in press).
9. Mello-Thoms C, Dunn SM, Nodine CF, Kundel HL, Weinstein SP. The perception of breast cancer: What differentiates missed from reported cancers in mammography? Acad Radiol 2002; 9:1004-4012.
10. Kundel HL, LaFollette PS. Visual search patterns and experience with radiological images. Radiology 1972; 103:523-526.
11. Mackworth NH. Stimulus density limits the useful field of view. In: Monty RA, ed. Eye Movements and Psychological Processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1976; 307-321.
12. Hillstrom AP. Repetition effects in visual search. Percept Psychophys 2000; 62:800-817.
13. Mallat S. Adapted Wavelet Analysis from Theory to Software. Chestnut Hill, Mass: Academic Press, 1994; 318-340.