Effects of lesion conspicuity on visual search in mammogram reading

Academic Radiology

Volumn 12, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 830-840

  Mello Thoms, Claudia ^a   Hardesty, Lara ^a   Sumkin, Jules ^a   Ganott, Marie ^a   Hakim, Christiane ^a   Britton, Cynthia ^a   Stalder, Jennifer ^a   Maitz, Glenn ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Eye movements; Mammography; Visual perception

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUPIL;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; EYE MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; OBSERVER VARIATION; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 22444437327     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2005.03.068     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. J.P. Garne, K. Aspegren, G. Balldin Increasing incidence of and declining mortality from breast carcinoma. Trends in Malmo, Sweden, 1961-1992 79 1997 Cancer 69 74
2. K.C. Chu, R.E. Tarone, L.G. Kessler Recent trends in US breast cancer incidence, survival and mortality rates J Nat Cancer Inst 88 1996 1571 1579
3. P.A. Wingo, L.A. Ries, H.M. Rosenberg Cancer incidence and mortality, 1973-1995 a report card for the US Cancer 82 1998 1197 1207
4. M.F. Ernst, A.C. Voogd, J.W.W. Coebergh Breast carcinoma diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis before and after the introduction of mass mammographic screening Cancer 100 2004 1337 1344
5. J. Warwick, L. Tabar, B. Vitak Time-dependent effects on survival in breast carcinoma results from 20 years of follow-up from the Swedish two-county study Cancer 100 2004 1331 1336
6. O. Ganry, J. Peng, A. Dubreuil Influence of abnormal screens on delays and prognostic indicators of screen-detected breast carcinoma J Med Screening 11 2004 28 31
7. S. Buseman, J. Mouchawar, N. Calonge Mammography screening matters for young women with breast carcinoma evidence of downstaging among 42-49-year-old women with a history of previous mammography screening Cancer 97 2003 352 358
8. B.C. Yankaskas, S.H. Taplin, L. Ichikawa Association between mammography timing and measures of screening performance in the United States Radiology 234 2005 363 373
9. R.F. Brem The never ending controversies of screening mammography what is the appropriate callback rate for women undergoing screening mammographic examination? Cancer 100 2004 1549 1552
10. J.G. Elmore, M.B. Barton, V.M. Moceri Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammogram and clinical breast examinations New Engl J Med 338 1998 1089 1096
11. H.L. Kundel, C.F. Nodine, D. Thickman Nodule detection with and without a chest image Invest Radiol 20 1985 94 99
12. L.J.W. Burhenne, S.A. Wood, C.J. D'Orsi Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography Radiology 215 2000 554 562
13. C.F. Nodine, H.L. Kundel, C. Mello-Thoms How experience and training influence mammography expertise Acad Radiol 6 1999 575 585
14. J.A. Harvey, L.L. Fajardo, C.A. Innis Previous mammograms in patients with palpable breast carcinoma retrospective vs. blinded interpretation AJR Am J Roentgenol 161 1993 1167 1172
15. E.A. Krupinski, C.F. Nodine Gaze duration predicts the location of missed lesions in mammography A.G. Gale Digital mammography 1994 Elsevier Science B.V Berlin 399 402
16. C.F. Nodine, C. Mello-Thoms, H.L. Kundel Time course of perception and decision making during mammographic interpretation AJR Am J Roentegenol 179 2002 917 923
17. C.F. Nodine, C. Mello-Thoms, S.P. Weinstein Blinded review of retrospectively visible unreported breast cancers an eye-position analysis Radiology 221 2001 122 129
18. H. Blume, B.M. Hemminger Image presentation in digital radiology perspectives on emerging DICOM display function standard and its application RadioGraphics 17 1997 769 777
19. H.L. Kundel, P.S. LaFollette Visual search patterns and experience with radiological images Radiology 103 1972 523 528
20. N.H. Mackworth Stimulus density limits the useful field of view R.A. Monty Eye movements and psychological processes 1976 Lawrence Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ
21. A.P. Hillstrom Repetition effects in visual search Perception Psychophys 62 2000 800 817
22. H.L. Kundel, C.F. Nodine, D.P. Carmody Visual scanning, pattern recognition and decision making in pulmonary nodule detection Invest Radiol 13 1978 175 181
23. M.A. Just, P.A. Carpenter, A. Miyake Neuroindices of cognitive workload neuroimaging, pupillometric and event-related potential studies of brain work Theoretical Issues Ergom Sci 4 2003 56 88
24. R.W. Backs, L.C. Walrath Eye movement and pupillary response indices of mental workload during visual search of symbolic displays Appl Ergon 23 1992 243 254
25. J. Beatty Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources Psychol Bull 91 1982 276 292
26. G. Reinhard, H. Lachnit The effect of stimulus probability on pupillary response as an indicator of cognitive processing in human learning and categorization Biol Psychol 60 2002 199 215
27. J.M. Wolfe, T.S. Horowitz, N. Kenner How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search Vision Res 44 2004 1411 1426
28. A. Mack, I. Rock Inattentional blindness perception without attention R.D. Wright Visual attention 1998 Oxford University Press New York, NY
29. T.M. Gersch, E. Kowler, B. Dosher Dynamic allocation of visual attention during the execution of sequences of saccades Vision Res 44 2004 1469 1483
30. F.H. Hamker The reentry hypothesis linking eye movements to visual perception J Vision 3 2003 808 816
31. M.S. Petterson, A.F. Kramer, D.E. Irwin Covert shifts of attention precede involuntary eye movements Percept Psychophys 66 2004 398 405
32. J.M. Henderson, A. Hollingworth High-level scene perception Ann Rev Psychol 50 1999 243 271
33. P.A. Starreveld, J. Theewes, K. Mortier Response selection in visual search the influence of response compatibility of nontargets J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perf 30 2004 56 78
34. P. Verghese, S.P. McKee Visual search in clutter Vision Res 44 2004 1217 1225
35. H.L. Kundel, C.F. Nodine A visual concept shapes image perception Radiology 146 1983 363 368
36. C. Mello-Thoms, S.M. Dunn, C.F. Nodine The perception of breast cancer what differentiates missed from reported cancers in mammography? Acad Radiol 9 2002 1004 1012
37. C. Mello-Thoms The perception of breast cancer an eye position analysis of mammogram interpretation Acad Radiol 10 2003 4 12
38. C. Mello-Thoms, S.M. Dunn, C.F. Nodine The perception of breast cancers a spatial frequency analysis of what differentiates missed from reported cancers IEEE Trans Med Imaging 22 2003 1297 1306
39. G. Revesz, H.L. Kundel Psychophysical studies of detection errors in chest radiology Radiology 123 1977 559 562
40. L. Tabar Mammography screening key conclusions supporting screening Breast J 9 2003 S7 S10
41. J. Reason Human error 1990 Cambridge University Press New York
42. C.F. Nodine, H.L. Kundel, S.C. Lauver Nature of expertise in searching mammograms for breast masses Acad Radiol 3 1996 1000 1006