Creating databases from cross-national comparisons of food mind-sets

Journal of Sensory Studies

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 550-586

  Rabino, Samuel ^a   Moskowitz, Howard ^b   Katz, Rachel ^b   Maier, Andrea ^b   Paulus, Klaus ^c   Aarts, Pieter ^c   Beckley, Jackie ^d   Ashman, Hollis ^d  

^a NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MOSKOWITZ JACOBS INC   (United States)

^c Sensor Marketing and Research BV   (Belgium)

^d Understanding and Insight Group   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548688172     PISSN: 08878250     EISSN: 1745459X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.2007.00122.x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. AGARWAL, M.K. 2003. Developing global segments and forecasting market share: A simultaneous approach using survey data. JIM II (4 56 80.
2. ALDEN, D., STEENKAMP, J.-B.E.M. BATRA, R. 1999. Brand positioning through advertising in Asia, North America and Europe. JM 63 (1 75 87.
3. BECKLEY, J. MOSKOWITZ, H.R. 2002. Databasing the Consumer Mind: The Crave It! Drink It! Buy It! & Healthy You! Databases, Institute of Food Technologists, Anaheim, CA.
4. BOX, G.E.P., HUNTER, J. HUNTER, L.S. 1978. Statistics for Experimenters, John Wiley, New York, NY.
5. CHRISTENSEN, C.M. 2001. The past and future of competitive advantage. Sloan Management Review Winter, 105 109.
6. COLLINS, F.S., GREEN, E.D., GUTTMACHER, A.E. GUYER, M.S. 2003. US National Human Genome Research Institute. A vision for the future of genomics research. Nature 422, 835 847.
7. CONLEY, L.A. GIESE, J. 2000. How the Internet is changing food product development. Food Technol. 54 (2 38 42.
8. DELAHUNTY, C. 2001. Age and cross cultural influences on food choice and acceptance. The 4th Pangborn Sensory Science Symposium, July 22-26, Dijon, France.
9. ERLANDSON, D. 2003. Are you ready to web-enable your NPD process? Vision Magazine http://www.pdma.org/visions/jul01/web_enabled1.html (accessed May 2007).
10. EUROMONITOR. 2003. Food market research reports. http://www. marketresearch.com (accessed May 2007).
11. HASSAN, S.S. KATSANIS, L.P. 1991. Identification of global consumer segments: A behavioral framework. Journal of International Consumer Marketing 3 (2 17.
12. HIRSCH, J.B. ZAWEL, S.A. 2002. Healthy You! Nutrition Ingredients That Drive Consumer Demand in Healthy Foods, Institute of Food Technologists, Anaheim, CA.
13. HOFFMAN, N.P. 2000. An examination of the "sustainable competitive advantage" concept: Past, present and future (2000). AMS Review No. 4, 20 43.
14. HOFSTEDE, F.T., STEENKAMP, J.-B.E.M. WESEL, M. 1999. International market segmentation based on consumer-product relations. JMR 36, 1 17.
15. HONG, Y. CHIU, C.Y. 2001. Toward paradigm shift from cross cultural differences in social cognition to social-cognitive mediation of cultural difference. Social Cognition 19 (3 181 196.
16. KÖSTER, E.P. 2003. The psychology of food choice: Some often encountered fallacies. Food Qual. Prefer. 14, 359 373.
17. LEVITT, T. 1983. The globalization of markets. HBR 6, 92 102.
18. LUCKOW, T., AARTS, P. MOSKOWITZ, H.R. 2003. A comparison of purchasing habits and sensory preferences for cola consumers across France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States. J. Food Technol. 1 (3 84 96.
19. MACELROY, B. 2000. Variables influencing dropout rates in Web-based surveys. Quirks Marketing Resarch Review. http://www.quirks.com (accessed May 2007).
20. MEISELMAN, H.L. 1978. Scales for measuring food preference. In Encyclopedia of Food Science (M.S. Petersen A.H. Johnson, eds.) pp. 675 678, AVI, Westport, CT.
21. MEISELMAN, H.L. SCHUTZ, H.G. 2003. History of food acceptance research in the US Army. Appetite 40, 199 216.
22. MELLES, T., LAUMANN, R. HOLLING, H. 2000. Validity and reliability of online conjoint analysis. In Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference No. 8, pp. 31-40, Sawtooth Software, Sequim, WA.
23. MIZUNO, M. 1997. Conjoint Analysis of Consumer Preferences in Cyber Space. Advances in Human Factors Ergonomics, 21B, pp. 475 478, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
24. MOSKOWITZ, H.R. 1996. Segmenting consumers world-wide: An application of multiple media conjoint methods. In Proceedings of the 49th ESOMAR Congress (Deborah Fellows, ed.) pp. 535-551, ESOMAR, Istanbul, Turkey.
25. MOSKOWITZ, H.R., GOFMAN, A., KATZ, R., ITTY, B., MANCHAIAH, M. MA, Z. 2001. Rapid, inexpensive, actionable concept generation & optimization - the use and promise of self-authoring conjoint analysis for the foodservice industry. Foodservice Technology 1, 149 168.
26. MOSKOWITZ, H.R., BECKLEY, J., MASCUCH, T., ADAMS, J., SENDROS, A. KEELING, C. 2002. Establishing data validity in conjoint: Experiences with Internet-based "mega-studies Journal of Online Research http://www.ijor.org/ijor_archives/articles/ establishing_data_validity_in_conjoint.pdf - size 165810 bytes - 9/19/2002 6:31:25 (accessed May 2007).
27. MOSKOWITZ, H.R., GERMAN, J.B. SAGUY, I.S. 2004. Unveiling health attitudes and creating good-for-you foods: The genomics metaphor and consumer innovative web-based technologies. CRC Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 45, 165 191.
28. MOSKOWITZ, H.R., PORRETTA, S. SILCHER, M. 2005. Concept Research in Food Product Design and Development, Blackwell, Ames, IA.
29. MOSLEY-MATCHETT, J.D. 1998. Leverage the Internet's research capabilities. Marketing News 32, 6.
30. PAWLE, J.S. COOPER, P. 2001. Using Internet research technology to accelerate innovation. In Proceedings of Net Effects 4, pp. 11-30, European Society of Market Research, Barcelona, Spain.
31. SETHI, S.P. 1971. Comparative cluster analysis for world markets. JMR 8, 348 354.
32. ROININEN, K., LÄHTEENMÄKI, L. TUORILA, H. 1999. Quantification of consumer attitudes to health and hedonic characteristics of foods. Appetite 33, 71 88.
33. ROZIN, P. 1982. Human food selection: The interaction of biology, culture and individual experience. In The Psychobiology of Human Food Selection (L.M. Barker, ed.) p. 225, AVI Publishing, Westport, CT.
34. RYANS, J.K., JR. 1969. Is it too soon to put a tiger in every tank? Columbia J. World Bus. 4, 73.
35. SAMLI, A.C. 1995. International Consumer Behavior, p. 130, Quorum Books, Westport, CT.
36. SHEPHERD, R. 1989. Factors influencing food preferences and choice. In Handbook of the Psychophysiology of Human Eating (R. Shepherd, ed.) pp. 3 24, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, London, England.
37. SHEPHERD, R. SPARKS, P. 1994. Modeling food choice. In Measurement of Food Preferences (D.M.H. Thomas H.J.H. MacFie, eds.) pp. 202 226, Blackie Academic and Professional, London, England.
38. STAFLEU, A., VAN STAVEREN, W.A., DE GRAAF, C., BUREMA, J. HAUTVAST, J.G.A.J. 1995. Family resemblance in beliefs, attitudes and intentions towards consumption of 20 foods: A study among three generations of women. Appetite 25, 201 216.
39. STEENKAMP, J.-B., HOFSTEDE, F.T. WEDEL, M. 1999. Across-national investigation into the individual and national cultural antecedents of consumer innovativeness. JM 63 (2 55 69.
40. THOMAS, C. 2005. Too many products: A study of the interaction of multinational corporations with heterogeneous consumer. Working paper, Department of Economics and Harvard Business School, Harvard University.
41. WITTINK, D.R. CATTIN, P. 1989. Commercial use of conjoint analysis: An update. JM 53, 91 96.
42. ZIND, T. 2000. Casting a net for new ideas Internet's continued proliferation presents opportunity to shave time off new product development. http://www.foodprocessing.com/Web_First/fp.nsf/ArticleID/MEAT-4P6UVH/ (accessed May 2007).