Buck-passing and the right kind of reasons

Philosophical Quarterly

Volumn 56, Issue 222, 2006, Pages 114-120

  Rabinowicz, Wlodek ^a   Roønnow Rasmussen, Toni ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548546667     PISSN: 00318094     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2005.00432.x     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. See our 'The Strike of the Demon: on Fitting Pro-attitudes and Value', Ethics, 114 (2004), pp. 391-424
2. Cf. also J. D'Arms and D. Jacobson, 'Sentiment and Value', Ethics, 110 (2000), pp. 722-48
3. J. Olson, 'Buck-Passing and the Wrong Kind of Reasons', The Philosophical Quarterly, 54 (2004), pp. 295-300
4. Cf. T.M. Scanlon, What we Owe to Each Other (Harvard UP, 1998), p. 97
5. R. Crisp, 'Value ... and What Follows. By Joel Kupperman', Philosophy, 75 (2000), pp. 458-62
6. See Parfit's distinction between 'state-given' (= attitude-given) reasons and 'object-given' reasons, in his 'Rationality and Reasons', in D. Egonsson et al. (eds), Exploring Practical Philosophy: from Action to Values (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001), pp. 17-41
7. Cf. 'The Strike of the Demon', p. 406
8. J. Broome, 'Reasons', in R.J. Wallace et al. (eds), Reasons and Value: Themes from the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz (Oxford UP, 2004), pp. 28-55
9. See 'A Sensible Subjectivism?', essay 5 in D. Wiggins, Needs, Values, Truth: Essays in the Philosophy of Value (Oxford: Blackwell, 1987), p. 189
10. See Humberstone, 'Two Types of Circles', Philosophical and Phenomenological Research, 57 (1997), pp. 249-80
11. For a detailed critical discussion of Humberstone's distinction, see R. Keefe, 'When Does Circularity Matter?', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 102 (2002), pp. 253-70