Three-dimensional sonographic study of breast nodules

Journal of Ultrasound

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 93-98

  Abbattista, T ^a   Serri, L ^a   Busilacchi, P ^a  

^a Ospedale Civile di Senigallia   (Italy)

Author keywords

3D sonography; Breast nodules; Power Doppler

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; B SCAN; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST LESION; BREAST TUMOR; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 34548501287     PISSN: 19713495     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jus.2007.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Rahbar G., Sie A.C., Hansen G.C., et al. Benign versus malignant solid breast masses. US differentiation. Radiology 213 (1999) 889-894
2. Stavros A.T., Thickman D., Rapp C.L., et al. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 196 (1995) 123-134
3. Ciatto S., Rosselli del Turco M., Catarzi S., and Morrone D. The contribution of ultrasonography to the differential diagnosis of breast cancer. Neoplasma 41 (1994) 341-345
4. Houssami N., Ciatto S., Irwig L., Simpson J.M., and Macaskill P. The comparative sensitivity of mammography and ultrasound in women with breast symptoms: an age - specific analysis. Breast 11 (2002) 125-130
5. Kolb T., Lichy J., and Newhause J. Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US-diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. Radiology 207 (1998) 191-199
6. Shipley J.A., Duck F.A., Goddard D.A., et al. Automated quantitative volumetric breast ultrasound data-acquisition system. Ultrasound Med Biol 31 (2005) 905-917
7. Inoue T., Tamaki Y., Sato Y., et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging of breast cancer by a real-time intraoperative navigation system. Breast Cancer 12 (2005) 122-129
8. Meyberg-Solomayer G.C., Kraemer B., Bergmann A., et al. Does 3-D sonography bring any advantage to noninvasive breast diagnostics?. Ultrasound Med Biol 30 (2004) 583-589
9. Cho K.R., Seo B.K., Lee J.Y., et al. A comparative study of 2D and 3D ultrasonography for evaluation of solid breast masses. Eur J Radiol 54 (2005) 365-370
10. Kuhl C.K., Mielcareck P., Klaschik S., et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?. Radiology 211 (1999) 101-110
11. Liberman L., Morris E.A., Dershaw D.D., Abramson A.F., and Tan L.K. Ductal enhancement on MR imaging of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181 (2003) 519-525
12. Del Maschio A., De Gaspari A., and Panizza P. Risonanza Magnetica in senologia. Rad Med 104 (2002) 253-261
13. Hwang E.S., Kinkel K., Esserman L.J., Lu Y., Weidner N., and Hylton N.M. Magnetic resonance imaging in patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma-in-situ: value in the diagnosis of residual disease, occult invasion and multicentricity. Ann Surg Oncol 10 (2003) 381-388
14. Orel S.G., and Schnall M.D. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 220 (2001) 13-30
15. Hlawatsch A., Teifke A., Schmidt M., and Thelen M. Preoperative assessment of breast cancer: sonography versus MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179 (2002) 1493-1501
16. Warner E., Plewes D.B., Hill K.A., et al. Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA 292 (2004) 1317-1325