Double-boom cycles and the comeback of science-push and market-pull

Research Policy

Volumn 36, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 1000-1015

  Schmoch, Ulrich ^a  

^a FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS AND INNOVATION RESEARCH ISI   (Germany)

Author keywords

Double boom cycle; Long term development; Market pull; Science push; Technology cycle

Indexed keywords

MARKETING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

DOUBLE-BOOM CYCLE; FEEDBACK LOOPS; LONG-TERM DEVELOPMENT; MARKET-PULL; TECHNOLOGY CYCLE;

TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

EID: 34548441143     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.11.008     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. In: Archibugi A., and Lundvall B.-A. (Eds). The Globalizing Learning Economy (2001), Oxford University Press, New York
2. Archibugi D. Patenting as an indicator of technological innovation - a review. Science and Public Policy 10 (1992) 357-368
3. Arundel A., Paal G.v.d., and Soete L. Innovation Strategies of Europe's Largest Industrial Firms. Results of the PACE Survey on Information Sources, Public Research, Protection of Innovations and Government Programmes (1995), MERIT, Maastricht
4. Basberg B.L. Patents and the measurement of technological change: a survey of the literature. Research Policy 16 (1987) 131-141
5. Battacharjya A.S. Composition of R&D and technological cycles. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 20 (1996) 445-470
6. Bass F. A new product growth model for consumer durables. Management Science 15 (1969) 225-255
7. Bickerstaff G.F. Impact of genetic technology on enzyme technology. The Genet 15 1 (1995)
8. Bush V. Science, The Endless Frontier (1945), Public Affairs Press, Washington, DC
9. Cainaraca G.C., and Colombo M.G. Agreements between firms and the technological life cycle model: evidence from information technologies. Research Policy 21 1 (1992) 45-62
10. Callon M. From science as an economic activity to socioeconomics of scientific research: the dynamics of emergent and consolidated techno-economic networks. In: Mirowski P. (Ed). Science Bought and Sold: Essays in the Economics of Science (2001), The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
11. Coombs R., and Hull R. Knowledge management practices and path-dependency in innovation. Research Policy 27 (1998) 237-253
12. Dalumn, B., Pedersen, C.R., Villumsen, G. 2002. Technological Life Cycles: Regional Clusters Facing Disruption, Aalborg/Copenhagen.
13. DiMaggio P.J., and Powell W.W. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. In: Powell W.W. (Ed). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (1991), The University of Chicago Press, Chicago/London 63-82
14. Dominguez Lacasa I., Grupp H., and Schmoch U. Tracing technological change over long periods in Germany in chemicals using patent statistics. Scientometrics 57 2 (2003) 175-195
15. Dosi G. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy 11 (1982) 147-162
16. Dosi G. Procedures and micro-economic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature XXVI (1988) 1120-1171
17. Dreher, C., Frietsch, R., Hemer, J., Schmoch, U., 2006. Die Beschleunigung von Innovationszyklen und die Rolle der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft. In: Bullinger, H.-J. (Ed.), Fokus Innovation. Kräfte bündeln - Prozesse beschleunigen, Hanser Verlag, München/Wien, pp. 275-306.
18. In: Edquist C. (Ed). Systems of Innovation. Technologies, Institutions and Organizations (1997), Pinter, London/Washington
19. Etzkowitz H. The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages. Research Policy 27 (1998) 823-833
20. Filson D. The nature and effects of technological change over the industry life cycle. Review of Economic Dynamics 4 (2001) 460-494
21. Fioretti G. A model of primary and secondary waves in investment cycles. Computational Economics 24 (2004) 357-381
22. Freeman C. The Economics of Industrial Innovation (1982), Frances Pinter Publishers, London
23. Freeman C., and Louçâ F. As Time Goes By - From the Industrial Revolution to the Information Revolution (2001), Oxford University Press, New York
24. Gibbons M., Limoges C., Nowotny H., Schwartzman S., Scott P., and Trow M. The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies (1994), SAGE Publications, London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi
25. Griliches Z. Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. Journal of Economic Literature 28 (1990) 1661-1707
26. Grupp H. Foundations of the Economics of Innovation - Theory, Measurement and Practice (1998), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham/Northampton
27. Grupp H., and Schmoch U. At the crossroads in laser medicine and polyimide chemistry. Patent assessment of the expansion of knowledge. In: Grupp H. (Ed). Dynamics of science-based innovation (1992), Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York 269-302
28. Grupp H., and Schmoch U. Perceptions of scientification as measured by referencing between patents and papers. Dynamics in science-based fields of technology. In: Grupp H. (Ed). Dynamics of science-based innovation (1992), Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York 73-130
29. Grupp H., Schmoch U., Schwitalla B., and Granberg A. Developing industrial robot technology in Sweden, West Germany, Japan and the USA. In: Sigurdson J. (Ed). Measuring the Dynamics of Technological Change (1990), Pinter Publishers, London/New York 106-129
30. Hinze S., and Schmoch U. Opening the black box. Analytical approaches and their impact on the outcome of statistical patent analyses. In: Moed H., Glänzel W., and Schmoch U. (Eds). Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of the R&D System (2004), Kluwer, Dordrecht/Norwell/New York/London 215-235
31. Hirooka M. Nonlinear dynamism of innovation and business cycles. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 13 (2003) 549-576
32. Irvine J., and Martin B.R. Foresight in Science. Picking the Winners (1984), Frances Pinter, London/Dover
33. Ishida J., and Yokoo M. Threshold nonlinearities and symmetric endogenous business cycles. Journal of Economic Behaviour & Organisation 54 (2004) 175-189
34. Joo Y.J., and Jun D.B. Growth-cycle decomposition diffusion models. Marketing Letters 7 3 (1996) 207-214
35. Klepper S. Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle. American Economic Review 86 3 (1996) 562-583
36. Kline S.J. Innovation is not a linear process. Research Management 28 (1985) 275-306
37. Kondratiev N. The major economic cycles. Voprosy Konjunktury. English Translation Reprinted in Lloyd's Bank Review 129 1 (1925) 28-79 (1978)
38. Leydesdorff L., and Etzkowitz H. Emergence of a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Science and Public Policy 23 (1996) 279-286
39. Linden, A., Fenn, J., 2002. Emerging Technologies Hype Cycle: Trigger to Peak, Gartner Group (ed.), Stamford, CT, p. 148, unpublished work.
40. Linnemann H. Robotertechnik. Begleitmaterial zum Wahlpflichtfach, SS 2006 (2006), Studiengang Technische Informatik, FH Berlin, Fachbereich VI, Berlin
41. Malerba F. Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy 31 2 (2002) 247-264
42. Matsuyama K. Growing through cycles in an infinitely lived agent economy. Journal of Economic Theory 100 (2001) 220-234
43. Mauri A., and McMillan G.S. The influence of technology on strategic alliances: an application of the Utterback and Abernathy model of product and process innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management 3 4 (1999) 367-378
44. Mensch G. Stalemate in Technology. Innovations Overcome the Depression (1979), Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge, Mass
45. Meyer-Krahmer F. The German innovation system. In: Larédo P., and Mustar P. (Eds). Research and Innovation Policies in the New Global Economy (2001), Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham 205-252
46. Meyer-Krahmer F., and Dreher C. Neuere Betrachtungen zu Technikzyklen und Implikationen für die Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft. In: Spath D. (Ed). Forschungs- und Technologiemanagement. Potenziale nutzen - Zukunft gestalten (2004), Hanser Verlag, München/Wien 27-35
47. Moed H.F. Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (2005), Springer-Verlag, Berlin
48. Myers S., and Marquis D.G. Successful Industrial Innovations. NSF 69-17 (1969), National Science Foundation, Washington, DC
49. Narin F., Noma E., and Perry R. Patents as indicators of corporate technology strength. Research Policy 16 (1987) 143-155
50. Nesta L., and Patel P. National patterns of technology accumulation: use of patent statistics. In: Glänzel W., Moed H., and Schmoch U. (Eds). Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies on R&D Systems (2004), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Norwell/New York/London 531-551
51. Noyons E.C.M., Buter R.K., Van Raan A.F.J., Schmoch U., Heinze T., and Ragnow R. Mapping Excellence in Science and Technology Across Europe. Life Sciences. Report to the European Commission (2003), CWTS, Leiden
52. Pavitt K. Sectoral patterns of technological change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy 13 (1984) 343-373
53. Pavitt K. Patent statistics as indicators of innovative activities: possibilities and problems. Scientometrics 7 (1985) 77-99
54. Pfeiffer W., and Bischof P. In: Steinmann H. (Ed). Produktlebenszyklen - Instrument jeder strategischen Produktplanung (1982), Planung und Kontrolle, Vahlen, München 133-166
55. Reger G., Cuhls K., and Wichert-Nick D.V. Challenges to and management of R&D activities. In: Reger G., and Schmoch U. (Eds). Organisation of Science and Technology at the Watershed. The Academic and Industrial Perspective (1996), Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg 139-266
56. Reiß T. Perspektiven der Biotechnologie - Wo steht die Bundesrepublik? (1990), Verlag TÜV Rheinland, Köln
57. Rickerby D.S., and Matthews A. In: Rickerby D.S., and Matthews A. (Eds). Market Perspectives and Future Trends. Handbook of Surface Engineering (1991), Blackie, Glasgow/London 343-364
58. Ropohl G. Eine Systemtheorie der Technik. Zur Grundlegung der Allgemeinen Technologie (1979), Carl Hanser Verlag, München/Wien
59. Schivardi F. Reallocation and learning over the business cycle. European Economic Review 47 1 (2003) 95-111
60. Schmidt-Tiedemann K.J. A new model of the innovation process. Research Management 25 2 (1982) 18-21
61. Schmoch U. Indicators and the relations between science and technology. Scientometrics 38 1 (1997) 103-116
62. Schmoch U. Hochschulforschung und Industrieforschung - Perspektiven der Interaktion (2003), Campus Verlag, Frankfurt a M./New York
63. Schmoch U., Grupp H., Mannsbart W., and Schwitalla B. Technikprognosen mit Patentindikatoren. Zur Einschätzung zukünftiger industrieller Entwicklungen bei Industrierobotern, Lasern, Solargeneratoren und immobilisierten Enzymen (1988), Verlag TÜV Rheinland, Köln
64. Schmoch U., Grupp H., Reiss T., and Strauss E. Monitoring science-based biotechnology by means of patent indicators. Research Evaluation 1 1 (1991) 61-68
65. Schmoch U., Hinze S., Jäckel G., Kirsch N., Meyer-Krahmer F., and Münt G. The role of the scientific community in the generation of technology. In: Reger G., and Schmoch U. (Eds). Organisation of Science and Technology at the Watershed (1996), Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg 3-138
66. Schmookler, J., 1962. Changes in Industry and in the State of Knowledge as Determinants of Industrial Innovation. In: National Bureau of Economic Research, (Ed.). The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 195-232.
67. Schmookler J. Invention and Economic Growth (1966), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass
68. Swann P. Innovation and the science base. Economic Outlook 18 9 (1994) 32-39
69. Tidd J., Besant J., and Pavitt K. Managing Innovation, Integrating Technological. Market and Organisational Change (2001), Wiley-VCH Verlag, Weinheim
70. Tijssen R.J.W. Science dependence of technologies: evidence from inventions and their inventors. Research Policy 31 (2002) 509-526
71. University of Texas, 2005. Robotics. Online: www.robotics.utexas.edu/rrg/learn_more/history/ (accessed: 2005-05-12).
72. Utterback J.M. Innovation in industry and the diffusion of technology. Science 188 (1974) 620-626
73. Utterback J.M., and Abernathy W.J. A dynamic model of product and process innovation. Omega 3 (1975) 639-656
74. Van Looy B., Ranga M., Callaert J., Debackere K., and Zimmermann E. Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect?. Research Policy 33 (2004) 425-441
75. Van Raan A.F.J. Handbook of quantitative studies of science and technology (1988), Amsterdam, North Holland
76. Van Raan A.F.J. Measuring science. Capita selecta of current main issues. In: Moed, Henk F., Glänzel, Wolfgang, Schmoch, and Ulrich (Eds). Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems (2004), Kluwer, Dordrecht/Boston/London 19-50
77. VDI/VDE-IT. 2006. Privater Robotermarkt überholt Industrieanwendungen. MST Online: www.mstonline.de/news/news/robotermarkt (accessed: 2006-05-18).
78. Werker C. Innovation, market performance, and competition: lessons from a product life cycle model. Technovation 23 4 (2003) 281-290
79. Weule H. Integriertes Forschungs- und Entwicklungsmanagement - Grundlagen, Strategien (2002), Umsetzung. Hanser Verlag, München